Jeff Allen
@jeffallen.bsky.social
920 followers 290 following 18 posts
Now: Building smaller but better things @Integrity_Inst integrityinstitute.org Physics: @LBNLphysics - @augerobs Tech: @dotdashco - @Facebook - @DNC
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
jeffallen.bsky.social
Which also isn't great for the platforms. Hank Green quote: "If platforms don't prioritize high quality content, they dig their own graves. And Facebook has a lot of shovels."

Long term, it's not in the a platforms interest to push mildly engaging slop. Keeping an eye on FBs WVCR in the meantime...
jeffallen.bsky.social
Great article by @issielapowsky.bsky.social about the impact AI content is already having. Even if the "dead internet theory" isn't 100% true, if platforms don't properly disencentivize AI content, it can still hurt online publishing and content creators.

www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Maybe AI Slop Is Killing the Internet, After All
The assertion that bots are choking off human life online has never seemed more true.
www.bloomberg.com
Reposted by Jeff Allen
knightgtown.bsky.social
🚨 NEW REPORT – Better Feeds: Algorithms That Put People First 🚨
As policymakers around the globe grapple with addressing concerns about algorithms, KGI’s new report offers guidance on improving the design of algorithmic systems that shape billions of users’ digital lives.
bit.ly/3QzxVzq
Better Feeds: Algorithms That Put People First – Knight-Georgetown Institute
bit.ly
Reposted by Jeff Allen
jeffallen.bsky.social
Haha!

@integrity-inst.bsky.social

But we haven’t really turned on the microphone yet here 🙈
Reposted by Jeff Allen
peoplevsbigtech.bsky.social
👀🔎 Last week Big Tech companies published their first reports of how they assess the systemic risks of their platforms to users under the EU’s Digital Services Act. Here’s what we’ve found so far: 🧵
Reposted by Jeff Allen
techpolicypress.bsky.social
We're assembling a starter pack of Tech Policy Press contributors on Bluesky! Follow the folks in our community for perspectives on a range of issues at the intersection of technology and democracy!
Reposted by Jeff Allen
jeffallen.bsky.social
Check out the Safe by Default report from Panoptykon, which discusses concrete changes platforms can make to move from engagement based design and ranking towards more human centric recommender systems.

panoptykon.org/sites/defaul...
panoptykon.org
jeffallen.bsky.social
Really excited to see the Non-Engagement Con paper come out! This represents broad consensus views about ranking and recommendations from a lot of experts on all kinds of ranking and recommendation systems.

arxiv.org/abs/2402.06831
Reposted by Jeff Allen
csmapnyu.org
Searching for sensitive topics on Instagram often surfaces harmful content, but doing the same search on Google doesn't. Why? One ranks search results based on engagement, and one ranks them based on quality and relevance. Interesting analysis here from the Integrity Institute's Jeff Allen 👇
jeffallen.bsky.social
Why is Instagram search so much more harmful than Google search?

New article from me on Instagram's decision to completely block searches for sensitive topics, on the Integrity Institute blog.

integrityinstitute.org/blog/why-is-...
jeffallen.bsky.social
Why is Instagram search so much more harmful than Google search?

New article from me on Instagram's decision to completely block searches for sensitive topics, on the Integrity Institute blog.

integrityinstitute.org/blog/why-is-...
jeffallen.bsky.social
Big thanks to @katieharbath.bsky.social and Glenn Ellingson for being leaders in that work, and to the dozens of members who contributed!

Check out all our elections program work here:
integrityinstitute.org/elections-in...
jeffallen.bsky.social
The EC cited Integrity Institute work multiple times in their guidance to platforms on protecting elections!

Exciting moment! That is the result of a year of work by our community putting together our recommended best practices on election integrity.

digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/comm...
jeffallen.bsky.social
It remains available in the app stores, and it wasn't in the list of platforms that will be regulated as VLOPs under the DSA. Telegram apparently reported that their monthly user count was below the threshold, but that just doesn't seem plausible and the EC is thankfully looking into it.
jeffallen.bsky.social
This poses a real challenge to societies: What do we do when a platform that is perfectly happy distributing violent content hits a billion users?

Telegram is my go-to example of why government regulation of social media platforms is necessary. But so far, it's been able to evade accountability.
jeffallen.bsky.social
And of course, the "restricting" of the channels is super leaky. There's plenty of examples of messages from restricted channels being shared in non-restricted channels. As with most solutions to problems on social media that attack the problems at a superficial level, it just doesn’t work!
jeffallen.bsky.social
Which is very strange! I will never understand thinking like "Oh, this channel has racist terms right in the channel name and lots of hateful messages about various ethnic groups. We definitely want to hide this from Google and Apple, but let's keep it on the platform."
jeffallen.bsky.social
Telegram hides lots of hate and violence filled channels from displaying on the version of the app from the Apple App Store and Google Play, but still keeps them on the platform and they are visible in a special "unrestricted" version of Telegram they put out, as well as the web browser version.