@jmichelberger.bsky.social
JUG Bodensee Co-Leader, Systemengineer @ Airbus Defence and Space
@smarks.bsky.social
I already cloned the OpenJdk Github repo to provide a pull request to provide the fix, but it seems I am not familiar enough with the contribution process and so on.
Can you please push this in the right direction to make the fix happen.
Best regards
Jörg
I already cloned the OpenJdk Github repo to provide a pull request to provide the fix, but it seems I am not familiar enough with the contribution process and so on.
Can you please push this in the right direction to make the fix happen.
Best regards
Jörg
October 12, 2025 at 7:48 PM
@smarks.bsky.social
I already cloned the OpenJdk Github repo to provide a pull request to provide the fix, but it seems I am not familiar enough with the contribution process and so on.
Can you please push this in the right direction to make the fix happen.
Best regards
Jörg
I already cloned the OpenJdk Github repo to provide a pull request to provide the fix, but it seems I am not familiar enough with the contribution process and so on.
Can you please push this in the right direction to make the fix happen.
Best regards
Jörg
@smarks.bsky.social
This would make me as the "nobody use that" user happy, because it feels so bad to access this via ProcessBuilder.
Withdrawn ticket in OpenJDK is here: bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8....
This would make me as the "nobody use that" user happy, because it feels so bad to access this via ProcessBuilder.
Withdrawn ticket in OpenJDK is here: bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8....
Loading...
bugs.openjdk.org
October 12, 2025 at 7:47 PM
@smarks.bsky.social
This would make me as the "nobody use that" user happy, because it feels so bad to access this via ProcessBuilder.
Withdrawn ticket in OpenJDK is here: bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8....
This would make me as the "nobody use that" user happy, because it feels so bad to access this via ProcessBuilder.
Withdrawn ticket in OpenJDK is here: bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8....
@smarks.bsky.social
Registration for jmod can be seen here: github.com/openjdk/jdk/..., same for jlink. But jimage seems to be forgotten: github.com/openjdk/jdk/....
IMHO it is trivial to add registration for the jlink and it seems that it also could be almost riskless be backported to JDK25/17/11.
Registration for jmod can be seen here: github.com/openjdk/jdk/..., same for jlink. But jimage seems to be forgotten: github.com/openjdk/jdk/....
IMHO it is trivial to add registration for the jlink and it seems that it also could be almost riskless be backported to JDK25/17/11.
github.com
October 12, 2025 at 7:45 PM
@smarks.bsky.social
Registration for jmod can be seen here: github.com/openjdk/jdk/..., same for jlink. But jimage seems to be forgotten: github.com/openjdk/jdk/....
IMHO it is trivial to add registration for the jlink and it seems that it also could be almost riskless be backported to JDK25/17/11.
Registration for jmod can be seen here: github.com/openjdk/jdk/..., same for jlink. But jimage seems to be forgotten: github.com/openjdk/jdk/....
IMHO it is trivial to add registration for the jlink and it seems that it also could be almost riskless be backported to JDK25/17/11.
@smarks.bsky.social
While it was with source/target 8 possible to compile and access the Main of jlink/jimage/jmod, encapsulation with source/target 11 does not. But the intended new ToolProvider API which should the three make accessible in a controlled way, lacks the Tool Registration of jlist.
While it was with source/target 8 possible to compile and access the Main of jlink/jimage/jmod, encapsulation with source/target 11 does not. But the intended new ToolProvider API which should the three make accessible in a controlled way, lacks the Tool Registration of jlist.
October 12, 2025 at 7:42 PM
@smarks.bsky.social
While it was with source/target 8 possible to compile and access the Main of jlink/jimage/jmod, encapsulation with source/target 11 does not. But the intended new ToolProvider API which should the three make accessible in a controlled way, lacks the Tool Registration of jlist.
While it was with source/target 8 possible to compile and access the Main of jlink/jimage/jmod, encapsulation with source/target 11 does not. But the intended new ToolProvider API which should the three make accessible in a controlled way, lacks the Tool Registration of jlist.
@smarks.bsky.social
Hi Stuart,
I hope you had a save travel home from Antwerp.
We talked at Devoxx Antwerp about a flaw with the programmatic accesibility of jimage in JDK21.
Hi Stuart,
I hope you had a save travel home from Antwerp.
We talked at Devoxx Antwerp about a flaw with the programmatic accesibility of jimage in JDK21.
October 12, 2025 at 7:39 PM
@smarks.bsky.social
Hi Stuart,
I hope you had a save travel home from Antwerp.
We talked at Devoxx Antwerp about a flaw with the programmatic accesibility of jimage in JDK21.
Hi Stuart,
I hope you had a save travel home from Antwerp.
We talked at Devoxx Antwerp about a flaw with the programmatic accesibility of jimage in JDK21.
Reposted
🚀 Dive into the latest Java 25 features with live demos using @jtaccuino.github.io notebooks! Explore #Java 25, AI and more. Join this interactive Java adventure at Devoxx Belgium 2025! #Devoxx
August 6, 2025 at 4:40 AM
🚀 Dive into the latest Java 25 features with live demos using @jtaccuino.github.io notebooks! Explore #Java 25, AI and more. Join this interactive Java adventure at Devoxx Belgium 2025! #Devoxx
Reposted
A conference from @java-champions.bsky.social for all Java developers - make sure to join @jchampionsconf.bsky.social !
Just a reminder to register for the free online Java Champions Conference taking place on Jan 23, 24, 27, 28 starting at 9:00 EST with sessions every hour with the last session starting at 15:00 EST. To register visit our web site jchampionsconf.com or www.eventbrite.com/e/jchampions...
January 7, 2025 at 10:32 PM
A conference from @java-champions.bsky.social for all Java developers - make sure to join @jchampionsconf.bsky.social !