All Joe Jeromes Are Belong to Us
joejerome.bsky.social
All Joe Jeromes Are Belong to Us
@joejerome.bsky.social
3 followers 1 following 8.6K posts
This is my archive of old tweets for posterity. Live account at: https://bsky.app/profile/joejerome.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
"So the proposals from the DOJ that match DDG’s suggestion of API access are much more interesting (and probably better) overall… It creates a scenario for increased competition without a corresponding harm to users or to other competitors.”

Couldn’t put it better myself!
Taking a World Series programming break to notice that @techdirt has a piece out on what to do about Google’s search monopoly: "The most reasonable suggestion seemed to be @DuckDuckGo main suggestion."
Meta @OversightBoard recommends changing community guidelines to stop the sharing of private residential information when it is considered 'publicly available’ in 2021.

Three years later:
Meta bans jet-tracking accounts that post updates on Trump, Musk and Zuckerberg
Meta said the actions were taken because of "the risk of physical harm to individuals."
www.nbcnews.com
“Not covering the extraordinary story of Concord reveals a deep failure in the mainstream press, and one born of a silly prejudice against a medium that towers over the films and television that such outlets are willing to understand.”
A Video Game Flopped Harder Than Anything At The Box Office This Year, And The Mainstream Press Barely Noticed - Kotaku
Sony's Concord might be the biggest entertainment failure of all time, so why wasn't it news?
kotaku.com
Google broke the law. Now argues fixing that will destroy capitalism.
I look forward to seeing what Google believes is a reasonable restriction on its business. I guess we’ll all find out in December! G’night!
Considering the other adtech competition case, I think you take Google’s claims about online advertising with a grain of salt.
Again, parallels to the breakup of the phone company. This is effectively platform hostage taking, and a divorce between OS/browser and search certainly doesn’t break the products.
“America’s technological leadership” depends on protecting a monopolist’s ability to dominate in AI. It’s a compelling rhetorical argument, but it’s functionally little different from previous arguments that breaking up the phone company would hurt national security.
A few quick thoughts:
(1) Sharing click and query data is already the law of the land in the EU, which has stronger privacy rules than the U.S. anyway.
(2) Google’s highlighted argument is a hedge. DuckDuckGo argues the opposite, that this increases incentives to differentiate.
And @googlepubpolicy is out with a response to the DOJ’s remedies framework (and is engaging in a bit a publishing time travel):
Anybody else just refreshing, waiting for the DOJ’s remedy framework for Google’s anticompetitive search practices?
“Privacy is valuable not because it empowers us to exercise control over our information, but because it protects against the creation of such information in the first place.”
What Is Privacy For?
We often want to keep some information to ourselves. But information itself may be the problem.
www.newyorker.com
Oh dear. First Amendment Twitter is gonna be triggered.
Meta just announced the Hyperscape app at #MetaConnect2024, which allows people to explore detailed maps of spaces. Just your gentle reminder that detailed spatial mapping raises some interesting privacy, property and safety considerations:
We can open up Google without opening up user data. Licensing Google’s search results does not involve accessing any user data. This remedy will not invade users' privacy! 5/5