Dr. Kalt
@kaltnull.bsky.social
160 followers 550 following 1.6K posts
Quite thrilling.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
kaltnull.bsky.social
tThat’s the other part. There is a lot of stick (healthcare costs / insurance tied to work / state of labor rights) that is considerably worse than in peer nations. But there’s a good amount of carrot too. When the stick becomes (much!) worse yet while the carrot disappears? Gonna have a bad time.
kaltnull.bsky.social
But... 1997 was just... The... Other...

....

God dammit, time.
kaltnull.bsky.social
I should clarify: By "Regime Change Levels Bad" I mean "so bad that it could induce people seeking regime change." Which is a level of bad that... I don't think anyone really WANTS to see, regardless of their attitudes towards this administration.
kaltnull.bsky.social
Ultimately this all again brings me back to the Bannon quote that keeps haunting me:

"I want to see babies starving in the streets of the United States, their bloated bellies there for everyone to see. If we get there, the American people will allow us to do ANYTHING."
kaltnull.bsky.social
As in there was a weird conspiracy theory that wasn't based in reality. And then people who bought into that became stupid rich and powerful. And then decided "hey the problem with that conspiracy theory was that *I* wasn't the one to decide who gets to live!"
kaltnull.bsky.social
And the big caveat here is that this is JUST an idle musing, I have no proof, I have no indications that this is a thing. It's just a thing I sometimes wonder. In the whole "every accusation is a confession" kinda vein.
kaltnull.bsky.social
Bear with me here. The UN Agenda 21/2030 conspiracy theory basically posited that. I sometimes wonder - again, bear with me! - if some of the right wingers and libertarians who bought into that conspiracy theory basically... Adopted something like that for themselves.
kaltnull.bsky.social
I remember the weird conspiracy theories about... 20 years ago? About some United Nations program that purportedly aimed at culling the world population to make people more manageable in the era of I think Peak Oil.
kaltnull.bsky.social
I fear that is true. I have had this sinking feeling for months now that we have really passed the point at which mass death is avoidable. Especially since it at times feels like mass death is what the ruling cohorts WANT.

As usual, I hope I'm wrong.
kaltnull.bsky.social
People play ball when they have to keep making money to pay all the bills. Especially when, say, protesting endangers the capability to pay these bills. But when those bills become so ABSURDLY unmanageable, when people really just lose EVERYTHING, that's... Not good for social stability.
kaltnull.bsky.social
And there is no possible end in sight unlike with, say, the pandemic. It's only going to get worse.

And this will ultimately test my thesis of continuing emiseration as the primary tool of social discipline in the United States. If that gets overdone, things fall apart.
kaltnull.bsky.social
There is EVERYTHING coming together too. The whole Assault On All Fronts by the administration on everything. Healthcare will get DRASTICALLY more pricey AND harder to get. As will groceries, but also eletricity, and basically everything people use on an everyday basis.
kaltnull.bsky.social
In all seriousness, what's coming is... Possibly going to be Regime Change levels bad. Great Depression levels "miles of soup lines" bad. A kind of bad that likely very few people born in this country have experienced. Hold on to your butts while they still have meat on them.
kaltnull.bsky.social
Everything Is Going To Suck So Fucking Bad - And Everyone Complaining Is A Terrorist.
Reposted by Dr. Kalt
judah-grunstein.bsky.social
If you wanted to script a scenario to perfectly vindicate the work of Jean Baudrillard, it would be Trump II.

A simulacra of a president running a simulation of a presidency, based on simulacra of news broadcast by simulations of news media.

Baudrillard is to Trump II what Foucault was to GWB.
kaltnull.bsky.social
I never got her and I will continue to not get her or any of the hype around her brand of what to me is just the blandest most vanilla lowest common denominator pop. I mean if that’s your thing, cool, but maybe we should have higher standards?
kaltnull.bsky.social
The whole process is stupefyingly costly and arbitrary and fraught with all kinda pitfalls. GC fees alone are somewhere in the realm of $2500-3000 for marriage based. Employment can be more yet. And the GC application is BEEFY paperwork so you want a lawyer. Which more than doubles the cost.
kaltnull.bsky.social
For consular processing too, right? We did AOS which also took about 13 months - and no interview. (For the uninitiated - consular processing is when the noncitizen spouse is residing outside the US - Adjustment of Status (AoS) is when the noncitizen is already here.)
kaltnull.bsky.social
Oh yeah assumption of false representation for the visa type (non immigrant vs. immigrant) is something not taken lightly.
kaltnull.bsky.social
There really isn't. And it's important to state that loudly and clearly (thanks!).

They might still do it because lmao. But it's important to be very clear that there is no merit to any of this nonsense.
kaltnull.bsky.social
If a USCIS agent gets an average of 8 minutes to adjudicate the entirety of an applicant's social media, that very clearly indicates they will use some sort of algorithm "AI" tool for screening. And the same thing seems to be planned for this 30 man social media ICE squad.
kaltnull.bsky.social
So, on the "30 people is very few" thing. Yes, they will obviously use LLMs for this. That was clear from the memo that USCIS would now screen all visa applicant's social media where they listed the increased work hours per case as something like 8 minutes per worker per case.
kaltnull.bsky.social
...and here I thought you were being mean. Reading that tweet, I do think this is likely true. A statement of fact. Not "I bet this guy drinks his own piss. [derogatory]."
kaltnull.bsky.social
All stick. No carrot. Why no popular?