Kostas Kampourakis
@kampourakisk.bsky.social
1.9K followers 140 following 300 posts

Author and editor of books intended to help non-experts understand science. Interested in anything about evolution, development, heredity and nature of science.

Philosophy 29%
Biology 23%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

theramseylab.bsky.social
New Cambridge Element in the Philosophy of Biology series—fully #openaccess! @thomasreydon.bsky.social explores how evolutionary theory crosses over from biology into other fields, showing how these crossovers embody a broader style of reasoning: 'evolutionary thinking' bit.ly/48z3h36 #HPbio #evosky
Book cover of “The Scope of Evolutionary Thinking” by Thomas A. C. Reydon, in the Cambridge Elements: The Philosophy of Biology series. Against a black background, the title is surrounded by Ernst Haeckel’s illustrations of marine organisms—radial, symmetrical forms in vivid blues, oranges, reds, and greens.

kampourakisk.bsky.social
Here is the Greek edition of my book Ancestry Reimagined. If you happen to be in Athens, Greece, on November 3, there will be a book discussion at the publisher's main bookstore. More info to come.

cup.gr/book/ethniki...

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

kampourakisk.bsky.social
Why studies about reconstructing the past based on contemporary DNA makes me think of the streetlight effect

open.substack.com/pub/kostaska...

kampourakisk.bsky.social
Interesting! (To say the least).
matthewcobb.bsky.social
News in the history of molecular biology. The Science History Institute in Philadelphia has acquired a huge archive of correspondence and other scientific material from the pioneers of molecular biology (Franklin, Klug, Perutz, Delbrück etc, with items from Crick and Watson, too). 1/n
History of Molecular Biology Collection
This unparalleled collection includes Rosalind Franklin's historic 'Photo 51,' which revealed the double-helix structure of DNA.
www.sciencehistory.org
matthewcobb.bsky.social
News in the history of molecular biology. The Science History Institute in Philadelphia has acquired a huge archive of correspondence and other scientific material from the pioneers of molecular biology (Franklin, Klug, Perutz, Delbrück etc, with items from Crick and Watson, too). 1/n
History of Molecular Biology Collection
This unparalleled collection includes Rosalind Franklin's historic 'Photo 51,' which revealed the double-helix structure of DNA.
www.sciencehistory.org

kampourakisk.bsky.social
Check out my latest book Trusting Science, using the attached 30% discount code, and let me know what you think!

kampourakisk.bsky.social
Excited to participate in this very interesting conference: zasb.unibas.ch/de/veranstal...

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

kampourakisk.bsky.social
Some scientists also think that historians do not know enough about the science to write about its history, which of course is not the case for good historians. Same for philosophers.

kampourakisk.bsky.social
For an individual on average, or the average individual perhaps, but not for any two specific individuals. It is one thing to made a mathematical calculation and another to make sense of it.

kampourakisk.bsky.social
My point was that I do not think we can make any legitimate inferences for individuals. Anyway, this may be of interest: plato.stanford.edu/entries/heri...
Heritability (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
plato.stanford.edu

kampourakisk.bsky.social
The statistic refers to a particular population as a whole.

kampourakisk.bsky.social
90% heritability for height means that 90% of the variance in height across individuals in that specific population, place, and time is statistically associated with genetic differences. What it does not mean is that your height, or my height, or any individual's height is 90% genetic.

kampourakisk.bsky.social
Worse, "heritability" is often taken by non-experts to mean, or to at least imply, "inheritability", that is, how much "inherited" a trait is...

kampourakisk.bsky.social
Here is a substack post about heritability, related to my comment below:
kostaskampourakis.substack.com/p/today-esti...
kampourakisk.bsky.social
"Today, estimates from twin studies attribute up to 90% of an individual’s height to their genetic makeup."

This is not corrrect! What heritability studies show is that at the population level 90% of the differences in height are due to genetic differences.

www.nature.com/articles/s41...
The genetic basis of human height - Nature Reviews Genetics
Genetic factors that influence human height encompass rare monogenic variants as well as common and rare polygenic variants. In this Review, Bicknell et al. summarize our current understanding of the ...
www.nature.com

kampourakisk.bsky.social
Glad my point is clear. I have no doubt that you and these authors know what you are talking about. I am rather concerned about how such poor expressions (such as the one in that article) may be misunderstood by laypeople, or - worse - be quoted while used for ideological purposes.