KazzyAnnie1
kazzyannie1.bsky.social
KazzyAnnie1
@kazzyannie1.bsky.social
1.2K followers 930 following 3.8K posts
Simp for the Tories = instant block Hold bigoted views = instant block Support Labour-in-name-only/FBPE = won't follow back & you'll hate a lot of my posts as I'm a true socialist. Love animals, music, humanity, nature, art = welcomed with open arms
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Time to join the dots - severe cuts to disability benefits, slashing Access to Work scheme, removing (voting down) all the guidelines in the "assisted dying bill" and employing the same propaganda as Aktion T4 and the subliminal messaging from the DWP ads
And they've stated Human Rights for ALL will be an explicit policy - so what's the problem?
So why are you so vitriolic about YP holding exactly the same vote on trans rights as the Green party did? It wouldn't be Green policy if there hadn't been a vote of the membership
So it's NOT about trans rights at all then? It's your personal grudge against one political party and all the others get a free pass. Noted
Have you said the same about the Green Party? They did the same and they currently have two vocal transphobes standing for leadership
It's to do with trans-rights or isn't that what's important?
Iv already stated my position that if the party isn't pro-trans I'll leave - I've been absolutely clear on MY ideology, I just don't hold one party to different standards and give others a free pass
Oh, and Ed Poole, who interviews people who want to stand for the Greens said EXACTLY that yesterday, in fact he made a big deal of the fact that, in his words "it's illegal to expel or ban people for GC views"
So voting for transphobes in a leadership election isn't "allowing racists and transphobes to vote in racist and transphobic policies"? Who do you think nominated those transphobes for the leadership election?
Maybe look in the mirror, you're the one reading things that don't exist!
Yet again you're reading something that isn't even there!
Well you're not calling THEM out for letting transphobes hold so much power in their party are you? Your anger seems very selective
So now you're accusing me of racism? You've seriously lost the plot.
That's your interpretation of it, not the words she actually says
And I asked YOU if you ask the same of a party that has TWO transphobes currently running for leadership. I've made clear where my redlines are
Please, point out what makes you think I'm an "FBPE type", let me guess - you've misread my bio (you seem to do that a lot, reading things that aren't actually there) and didn't see it actually says that I won't follow back FBPE and they won't like a lot of what I post
Why so much vitriol for a party that has the same democratic, member-led policy making system and not for the Greens?
You do know the Greens were saying, only yesterday, that it's illegal for them to ban or expel GC members don't you? You do know they've currently got TWO transphobes running for the party leadership don't you?
Please point to where exactly she "clearly says she will not say bigots are not allowed in Your Party"
they have exactly the same "members vote on policy" system AND they have two transphobes actually standing for leadership at the moment!
Because you aren't asking in good faith - I've made quite clear that I won't stay in a party that doesn't have pro-trans policies. You still haven't answered my initial q as to whether you ask the same of Green Party members even though
She's clearly stated that even though some people might see anti-racism or pro-trans as contentious she'll fight as hard as she can for those policies to be in the new party, in a party that is member-led (the same as the Greens) I don't see why she needs to be defended.
They all have been at some point in history. I've made it quite clear where my personal red line is
Please point out where I've said, or even implied, that. Quite the contrary - I've clearly stated that not being pro-trans is a red line for me and I'll leave if they aren't.