koenfucius.substack.com
Our economy is built on the enigmatic concept of the economic surplus: the win-win of trade, making both buyer and seller better off. But this surplus relies on mutual ignorance, which is under threat...
buff.ly/SurWHY3
Instead, moral rules are the rules of the Game of Life—neither Good nor Right, but Seemly:
buff.ly/GXFW4Ut
Instead, moral rules are the rules of the Game of Life—neither Good nor Right, but Seemly:
buff.ly/GXFW4Ut
Research by Dubourg et al explores the psychological drivers of storytelling:
buff.ly/NzpsZfV
Research by Dubourg et al explores the psychological drivers of storytelling:
buff.ly/NzpsZfV
If sellers discover individual customers’ willingness to pay and set individual prices, this is under threat:
buff.ly/SurWHY3
If sellers discover individual customers’ willingness to pay and set individual prices, this is under threat:
buff.ly/SurWHY3
Meer keuzes dan we vermoeden kunnen zelfs helemaal niet op die manier worden gemaakt.
Mijn @apache.be stukje, Ver voorbij de afweging:
buff.ly/E8Yzjkz
Meer keuzes dan we vermoeden kunnen zelfs helemaal niet op die manier worden gemaakt.
Mijn @apache.be stukje, Ver voorbij de afweging:
buff.ly/E8Yzjkz
But why do we shiver when we’re cold?
(TL;DR: to get warmer)
buff.ly/LMDk5IJ
But why do we shiver when we’re cold?
(TL;DR: to get warmer)
buff.ly/LMDk5IJ
…but does that hold true for the Contemporary-Art Market, with its somewhat surreal economics?
buff.ly/eOKbEDU
…but does that hold true for the Contemporary-Art Market, with its somewhat surreal economics?
buff.ly/eOKbEDU
How many millilitres in 2.4 litres? Easy peasy.
How many minutes in 2.4 hours? 🤔😬
When you think in base 10 but you’re in base 60, things are challenging:
buff.ly/2zJe604
How many millilitres in 2.4 litres? Easy peasy.
How many minutes in 2.4 hours? 🤔😬
When you think in base 10 but you’re in base 60, things are challenging:
buff.ly/2zJe604
• than they like the stranger
• than the stranger actually does
buff.ly/UQt4UEO
• than they like the stranger
• than the stranger actually does
buff.ly/UQt4UEO
Could they destroy the economy?
buff.ly/SurWHY3
Could they destroy the economy?
buff.ly/SurWHY3
Maar is dat wel zo?
Mijn @apache_be stukje legt een ietwat complexer verhaal bloot—Ver voorbij de afweging :
buff.ly/E8Yzjkz
Maar is dat wel zo?
Mijn @apache_be stukje legt een ietwat complexer verhaal bloot—Ver voorbij de afweging :
buff.ly/E8Yzjkz
buff.ly/6m00l39
buff.ly/6m00l39
Matt Grawitch’s second post on stress strips away the hype and the illusion that resilience is like a muscle you can train, and checks what is left of it:
buff.ly/7K2fU91
Matt Grawitch’s second post on stress strips away the hype and the illusion that resilience is like a muscle you can train, and checks what is left of it:
buff.ly/7K2fU91
It does not so much disincentivize the subject’s pursuing alternatives as disincentivize the alternatives’ pursuing the subject:
buff.ly/VJlKCmS
It does not so much disincentivize the subject’s pursuing alternatives as disincentivize the alternatives’ pursuing the subject:
buff.ly/VJlKCmS
buff.ly/YRnVyGi
buff.ly/YRnVyGi
The Moon’s other side is very different from the side we can see from Earth—rock samples brought back recently by a Chines probe reveal hidden lunar history:
buff.ly/LKS3IwV
The Moon’s other side is very different from the side we can see from Earth—rock samples brought back recently by a Chines probe reveal hidden lunar history:
buff.ly/LKS3IwV
buff.ly/ZARyAZY
(Posting this from my weekly choir practice—just before the warmup 😎🎶)
buff.ly/ZARyAZY
(Posting this from my weekly choir practice—just before the warmup 😎🎶)
But did he ever manage to convince his children?
buff.ly/WPvq2gG
But did he ever manage to convince his children?
buff.ly/WPvq2gG
Charles Dickens showed the way, writes Dave Trott:
buff.ly/1NREb2w
Charles Dickens showed the way, writes Dave Trott:
buff.ly/1NREb2w
Paper by Dawes from 1979 argues that even *improper* linear models (ie with predictor weights that are determined by non-optimal methods—equal unit weights suffice) outperform ‘clinical’ intuition:
buff.ly/rODIEn6
Paper by Dawes from 1979 argues that even *improper* linear models (ie with predictor weights that are determined by non-optimal methods—equal unit weights suffice) outperform ‘clinical’ intuition:
buff.ly/rODIEn6
For this to work, both sides must be ignorant of the other’s willingness.
What if one side isn’t?
buff.ly/SurWHY3
For this to work, both sides must be ignorant of the other’s willingness.
What if one side isn’t?
buff.ly/SurWHY3
Humans—unlike AI—never get stuck in infinite loops.
Our existence is rooted in time and progressing entropy. Both may be consciousness prerequisites:
buff.ly/8PxbtRs
Humans—unlike AI—never get stuck in infinite loops.
Our existence is rooted in time and progressing entropy. Both may be consciousness prerequisites:
buff.ly/8PxbtRs
•strongly believe extraterrestrial intelligent life exists
•vastly underestimate peers’ beliefs (pluralistic ignorance)
•underestimate the *intensity* of experts’ beliefs
•resist belief updating
buff.ly/4oTiWQr
•strongly believe extraterrestrial intelligent life exists
•vastly underestimate peers’ beliefs (pluralistic ignorance)
•underestimate the *intensity* of experts’ beliefs
•resist belief updating
buff.ly/4oTiWQr
But new research has pinpointed what makes midlife tough for somem—income, much more than age.
buff.ly/PcLfoVS
But new research has pinpointed what makes midlife tough for somem—income, much more than age.
buff.ly/PcLfoVS
A new approach based on—if all things—hydrogen sulphide (known by its rotten egg smell) shows promise:
buff.ly/YUlMqLR
A new approach based on—if all things—hydrogen sulphide (known by its rotten egg smell) shows promise:
buff.ly/YUlMqLR
The utter genius of the work shines through so much clearer, don’t you think?
youtu.be/KJZ0JAFSN9s
The utter genius of the work shines through so much clearer, don’t you think?
youtu.be/KJZ0JAFSN9s