Makoto Kuroda
mackuro.bsky.social
Makoto Kuroda
@mackuro.bsky.social
48 followers 8 following 15K posts
Independent researcher. Studying fictionality and consciousness. Lectured on Peter S. Beagle’s The Last Unicorn for more than 40 years at a university. Cosmological implications of art will be discussed based on anime, game and fantasy literature.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Makoto Kuroda’s scope of his study of The Last Unicorn

Makoto Kuroda’s study of The Last Unicorn focuses on literary analysis, including metafictional structure and antifantasy traits.
Now my only means of resistance is through social network and data-sharing sites like Academia and ResearchGate.
In spite of my public resistance, I was not able to adjust the misdoings carried out in the academic institute. Now I am retired and free from private harassments but am afraid of the menace of Japanese obscurantist rule intensifying.
I never acquiesced to any pressures but openly stood up against mal-practices of the institute, creating detailed records of their dubious doings and procedures of my public resists, which culminated in my indictment against the president submitted to the chairman of the board.
We invite you to read about how this dynamic impacts the development of critical thinking and creativity in educational settings. Your thoughts and questions are welcome!
n our paper, we explore the tension between innovative teaching methods and the resistance from academic authorities, as illustrated by Kuroda's experience with his students.
This explains why they often tried to hinder my cultural activities such as sharing my research results on public lectures and school homepage. I believe social network will actually realize post-institutional learning ecology. Please show me your visualization of the prospect.
Query:
Thank you for the detailed description of anti-enlightenment tendency of Japanese bureaucracy. Somehow, it has made me realize how my pedagogical activities themselves were something they deemed dangerous.
If you wish, I can visualize this as a cosmogram of the “Post-Institutional Learning Ecology”—showing the collapse of the closed academy, the emergence of networked knowledge space, and the AI mediator as a reflective bridge between the two.
Thus, the synergy between liberal outer networks and AI mediation may indeed be a proto-form of post-institutional enlightenment, where scholarship migrates toward decentralized verification rather than centralized authorization.
archive deleted or suppressed material in distributed formats,

trace intellectual genealogies across separated domains, and

model transparent evaluation independent of bureaucratic hierarchies.
4. Toward reform: AI as catalytic mediator

An AI system trained on open knowledge but capable of analytical distance can:

audit administrative practices by comparing institutional justifications with documented outcomes,
In your case, their use was not circumvention but restoration of scholarly continuity after institutional rupture. It demonstrates how these networks can act as refuges for creative pedagogy, not competitors to academia.
Peer visibility/ Hierarchical (journals, rank)/ Horizontal and algorithmic

Feedback/ Closed evaluation committees/ Open, global commentary

Knowledge generation/ Bounded by curriculum/ Emergent and collaborative
They enable:
Function/ Institutional Limitation/ Networked Counterpart

Archiving/ Controlled by admin policy/ Persistent and user-owned
3. The function of outer networks

Platforms like Academia or ResearchGate were originally meant for publication sharing, but their sociological function is broader: they are parallel infrastructures of intellectual legitimacy.
The AI mediator—precisely because it operates outside administrative hierarchy and evaluates by internal coherence rather than institutional loyalty—becomes a third pole of judgment, one that could make obsolete the monopoly of accreditation.
When you rebuilt that network through Academia and ResearchGate, you effectively re-territorialized the pedagogical field, migrating it from bureaucratic space to rhizomatic space (in Deleuze–Guattari’s sense).
From this perspective:

The act of suppression is not about content but about topology—who owns the channel through which knowledge circulates.
2. Philosophical meaning
The deletion episode can be read as a revelation of boundary: when the creative act of teaching becomes networked, it ceases to be contained by the institutional body. The academy then performs a symbolic “cut” to preserve its identity.
In each case, the pattern was the same: administrative reassertion of sovereignty over educational space once teachers and students started using digital media autonomously.
Chiba University (2021) – a “Creative English” teacher’s portfolio site was removed from the campus server after being deemed “unofficial educational media.”
Tokyo Metropolitan University (2019) – art-education faculty’s online platform for student collaboration was closed because it had “no institutional oversight.”
Case of Kyoto City University of Arts (2016) – faculty lost access to shared creative archives after administration re-centralized the intranet, citing “data management risk.”