Marketing should respect attention, not exploit it.
No mercy for manipulative metrics.
Now we’re seeing fee-free promotions and clearer pricing.
That’s how markets actually change:
Not from brand values
From enforcement + customer backlash
Now we’re seeing fee-free promotions and clearer pricing.
That’s how markets actually change:
Not from brand values
From enforcement + customer backlash
She made them a regulatory target.
The FTC has been pushing rules requiring total price transparency and going after companies that hide fees or use drip pricing.
So when a delivery app waives fees today, it’s not generosity.
It’s adaptation.
She made them a regulatory target.
The FTC has been pushing rules requiring total price transparency and going after companies that hide fees or use drip pricing.
So when a delivery app waives fees today, it’s not generosity.
It’s adaptation.
It’s a response to pressure.
Customers revolted against junk fees.
Regulators started cracking down.
The FTC literally sued them over deceptive pricing.
Funny how transparency suddenly becomes a feature when enforcement shows up.
It’s a response to pressure.
Customers revolted against junk fees.
Regulators started cracking down.
The FTC literally sued them over deceptive pricing.
Funny how transparency suddenly becomes a feature when enforcement shows up.
Now we watch content and tolerate brands.
That’s a completely different power dynamic, and a lot of companies haven’t caught up yet.
Now we watch content and tolerate brands.
That’s a completely different power dynamic, and a lot of companies haven’t caught up yet.
A lot of those views aren’t people watching TV.
They’re people seeing the ad on their phone the next day.
The distribution changed.
The story about the ad became the real media.
A lot of those views aren’t people watching TV.
They’re people seeing the ad on their phone the next day.
The distribution changed.
The story about the ad became the real media.
The new model is spectacle.
If an ad can’t get shared, clipped, memed, or debated, it basically didn’t happen.
The new model is spectacle.
If an ad can’t get shared, clipped, memed, or debated, it basically didn’t happen.
Not because the ads are bad… but because the brand used to feel like something you found, not something pushed at you.
That’s the trade-off with scale:
You gain reach.
You lose a little magic.
Not because the ads are bad… but because the brand used to feel like something you found, not something pushed at you.
That’s the trade-off with scale:
You gain reach.
You lose a little magic.
youtu.be/b7Tb1qF6BQ8
youtu.be/b7Tb1qF6BQ8
They just need plausibility.
A calm tone. A nice layout. A few testimonials.
That’s enough to bypass your brain—and drain your bank.
Fraud doesn’t scream. It whispers, “this looks legit.”
They just need plausibility.
A calm tone. A nice layout. A few testimonials.
That’s enough to bypass your brain—and drain your bank.
Fraud doesn’t scream. It whispers, “this looks legit.”
They amplify them.
Because engagement ≠ ethics.
We built trust systems on vibes, not verification.
So don’t act surprised when it all collapses.
They amplify them.
Because engagement ≠ ethics.
We built trust systems on vibes, not verification.
So don’t act surprised when it all collapses.
The most dangerous marketing myth of all.
Modern scams don’t feel shady. They feel plausible.
They sound like LinkedIn. They look like Shopify.
They are us—on autoplay.
The most dangerous marketing myth of all.
Modern scams don’t feel shady. They feel plausible.
They sound like LinkedIn. They look like Shopify.
They are us—on autoplay.
Repeat it. Tattoo it.
The number of followers, frequency of posts, and Canva-quality design do not equal trust.
But we built a system where they feel like they do.
And that’s the scam.
Repeat it. Tattoo it.
The number of followers, frequency of posts, and Canva-quality design do not equal trust.
But we built a system where they feel like they do.
And that’s the scam.
Or is it just marketing that dropped the pretense?
The line is gone.
We trained consumers to trust aesthetics, repetition, and social proof.
Now those tools are getting used against them.
Or is it just marketing that dropped the pretense?
The line is gone.
We trained consumers to trust aesthetics, repetition, and social proof.
Now those tools are getting used against them.
That phrase is the verbal equivalent of handing me a juice box after lighting my house on fire.
That phrase is the verbal equivalent of handing me a juice box after lighting my house on fire.
It’s not higher-than-usual.
It’s always like this.
That’s not an exception. That’s your business model.
It’s not higher-than-usual.
It’s always like this.
That’s not an exception. That’s your business model.
It’s a simulation of empathy built to manage outrage, not resolve it.
Polite language wrapped around contempt.
It’s a simulation of empathy built to manage outrage, not resolve it.
Polite language wrapped around contempt.
Then why am I 23 minutes into a loop that sounds like the inside of a migraine?
If you cared, you’d fix the system—not gaslight me every 30 seconds.
Then why am I 23 minutes into a loop that sounds like the inside of a migraine?
If you cared, you’d fix the system—not gaslight me every 30 seconds.
Unless you used roadside too often.
Then your “perk” becomes a penalty.
That slogan didn’t age badly.
It was never honest to begin with.
Unless you used roadside too often.
Then your “perk” becomes a penalty.
That slogan didn’t age badly.
It was never honest to begin with.
“We’re not like the others.”
Now they are the others—
same jokes, same loopholes, same fine print.
If everyone’s quirky, no one’s trustworthy.
“We’re not like the others.”
Now they are the others—
same jokes, same loopholes, same fine print.
If everyone’s quirky, no one’s trustworthy.
But when your house floods or your car's totaled,
you realize:
The mascot doesn’t pick up the phone.
The promise was always vibes, not substance.
But when your house floods or your car's totaled,
you realize:
The mascot doesn’t pick up the phone.
The promise was always vibes, not substance.
Claims got harder.
Roadside “perks” became risk signals.
The humor didn’t make it better.
It made the betrayal feel smug.
Claims got harder.
Roadside “perks” became risk signals.
The humor didn’t make it better.
It made the betrayal feel smug.
You laughed at Mayhem.
You bought into the sitcom-friendly “Jake.”
Then your premiums tripled, and your claim got denied.
That wasn’t a mistake. That was the model.
Insurance didn’t break trust. It rented it, then took it back.
You laughed at Mayhem.
You bought into the sitcom-friendly “Jake.”
Then your premiums tripled, and your claim got denied.
That wasn’t a mistake. That was the model.
Insurance didn’t break trust. It rented it, then took it back.
But a lot of it is quietly manipulative and profitable because of that.
That’s why we built the BS Continuum.
A map of where your tactics land:
Honest Signal → Theater → Manipulation → Deception
Know the difference. And own where you stand.
But a lot of it is quietly manipulative and profitable because of that.
That’s why we built the BS Continuum.
A map of where your tactics land:
Honest Signal → Theater → Manipulation → Deception
Know the difference. And own where you stand.