Meandertalaren
banner
meandertalaren.bsky.social
Meandertalaren
@meandertalaren.bsky.social
21 followers 14 following 59 posts
A Swedish revert since 2018. Always remember who loves you the most and always give thanks and praise.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Islam is compatible with all societies, muslims can be devoted muslims no matter where they are.

The Western world is not however compatible with Jannah.

When you say islam isn't compatible with the Western values. You are correct.

Islam forbids alcohol/drugs, porn, gambling, genocide and rape.
Kanske dags att ta bort davidsstjärnan? En symbol för fascism och terror ska inte representera judarna.
I rarely log in here but when I do I make sure you know.
Reposted by Meandertalaren
You all know how it goes:

Death
Death
You all know how it goes:

Death
Death
Yes, there are hints.

I don't know about the US but here in Sweden you can buy vapes with small doses of marijuana.There are hundreds of variants and people can't disuinguish less bad vs bad. Brands also have different emissions.

I don't think we should glorify vapes just because cigs are worse.
I think a big problem and challenge is that they are marketed as "more safe" and a "better alternative" when the wording should be "less harmful" and a "not as bad alternative". People think vapes have no effect on health and lungs.

Vapes are not healthy, both are trash but one is just more trash.
Why would you have offended me?

You gave me valuable reading and strong arguments.
Yes. And we did know it 50 years ago but the facts were supressed to benefit the companies selling/manufacturing cigarettes.

I did say cigarettes are worse, but vapes can be similiar or worse in some cases. Behaviour and convinience = more exposure. 40 puffs vs 120 puffs a day for example.
None of the alternatives are beneficial and both belong in the trash.

As we do not have any long term studies on vaping yet we have yet to see the long term effect. But seeing how convinient it risks increasing exposure to harmful emissions. Smoking inside, cars etc.
Also read my post more carefully.

I am very clear e-cigarettes contain less harmful chemicals but behaviour needs to be taken into consideration.

Don't you agree?
If you had a process at work containing the same emissions you would be forced to wear a protective mask.

We also have no long-term studies like we have on cigarettes but we have on most of the individual substances.

As a HSE specialist, a long side my colleuges, we of course see the risks.
When reviewing and comparing what we do know and also how convienient e-cigarettes are and that they are more addictive it is not clear as those statements.

The same institutions also said smoking was healthy just 60 years ago.
Trycket på Hamas?

Är det Hamas som bombat sönder Gaza? Svälter befolkningen och bombar dem? Är det hamas som dödat monst 440 000 palestinier?

Ebba ska till Haag, hon ska dömas hårt och få möta rättvisa.
This, combined with higher behavioural accessibility, can lead to more frequent inhalation and potentially higher cumulative exposure to certain toxins — especially for heavy users.

E-cigarettes are not more healthy than smoking. They are similiar or in a lot of cases — even worse.
While cigarettes may contain more harmful substances overall, vaping creates a higher frequency and convenience – driven exposure to hazardous aerosols that, in any industrial context, would be treated as unsafe without protective equipment.
Exempel från en helt vanlig Sverigedemokrat som "ogillar extremism"
Är USA bara en proxystat för Israel?

Hur kan ett litet fascistland som är historiens värsta terrorstat fått sådan makt?
I don't really understand the algorithm on bluesky.

I only get insects and cats, but all I want is political, theologi and news.

Anyway, fuck israel and free Palestine baby 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸
Great input. Thanks.

My morale is superior to those who justify and glorify porn while rejecting the harm of it despite compelling evidence.
Nice try.

It doesn't take a degree to know that you asked for references with no intention of actually read them or do research on it.

You glorify it by denying the harm of it on multiple layers of society and individuals.
Saying consent while ignoring the reality shows your agenda.
You are glorifying it, saying it causes no harm, it’s fine if both have consent etc.

Reality is what it is. Porn causes harm on a micro and macro level. Porn has no benefits to people or society.

It should be removed and forbidden.
There are of course more if you really want to know more. Even more layers and more depressing data associated with porn.

Many 'creators' try to glorify it, just as others try to glorify or justify their actions. But to glorify prostitution and doing porn just harms everyone.
– Vanligt med dissociation & psykisk avtrubbning under inspelning
(Sun et al. 2016)
– Sämre mental hälsa än genomsnittet, trots vissa självrapporterad "frivillighet"
(Grudzen et al. 2009)
Kvinnor i porrindustrin

– 68 % har PTSD-symtom, 60 % utsattes för sexuella övergrepp som barn
(Farley et al. 2003)
– Hög förekomst av depression, självskada & missbruk
(Moran 2012; Layden 2005)
– 88 % av porrvideor innehåller våld mot kvinnor
(Bridges et al. 2010)
samband mellan hög porrkonsumtion och:

– Alkohol & drogbruk (Donevan & Mattebo 2017)
– Skärm- & internetberoende (Wéry & Billieux 2017)
– Ångest, depression & självförakt (Grubbs et al. 2020)
-Sexuella riskbeteenden (Ševčíková et al. 2021)
–Hjärnförändringar liknande beroende (Kühn & Gallinat 2014)