Cross
@mrcross.bsky.social
44 followers 170 following 350 posts
In no particular order. 31. Mildly furry, quite gay. Cat lover, User Experience Researcher, Gamer, Roleplayer and Delightful Nerd.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
mrcross.bsky.social
Sometimes you need a firm mattress.
mrcross.bsky.social
If their points weren't delivered in such bad faith, I would point out the difference between things you cannot do because of a disability, and things you cannot do because you can't be bothered to learn it.
mrcross.bsky.social
I think you're a raccoon. A clever little dumpster diving, mischievous fella.
mrcross.bsky.social
When you build a data centre, its total computing capacity is measured in MW and GW, because a small amount of high-performance GPU computing units (HPCs) consume the same power as many, many times more ordinary servers. The power is the limiting factor, and hence that's the metric.
mrcross.bsky.social
You're implying this version doesn't have 🍆. It absolutely does. :D
mrcross.bsky.social
How long and thick is his dick without extra enhancement?
mrcross.bsky.social
Give him the knot! Knot him!
mrcross.bsky.social
Isn't all of this just an attempt to make you jump without needing to push? There's no additional win for them from outright ban, I think?
mrcross.bsky.social
It's a streaming service. The commander will as far as I'm aware never pay wall their work.
mrcross.bsky.social
Your good spirits and argumentative thoroughness really makes your point.
mrcross.bsky.social
That's not quite my point. I'm talking specifically in a sexual context here. Even the most provocative culture portraying rape and such doesn't go as far as some rule34 does. That difference in acceptability may be arbitrary, but it's not meaningless.
mrcross.bsky.social
You're hitting the nail on the head. No GenAI company even has a path to profitability yet. They're hoping to makes companies and society so dependent on their tech that when they raise prices to actually sustainable ones, orgs have no option to bow their heads and pay up.
mrcross.bsky.social
I am, but uh, that's been the case for 20 years by now. At some point, using a private platform to share thoughts and works comes down to trust. While most that were trustworthy sure as hell aren't now, at least Bluesky positive at this time, and in the world of tech, that's all you're getting. :/
mrcross.bsky.social
I don't think that is the intention with which the guidelines are written. Ultimately, any ruleset is going to have gray areas unless it's written by law experts and then tested by judges. The proof will be in how these rules are exercised, what works get removed and which do not. That is upsetting.
mrcross.bsky.social
I think you've missed the final chapter of the guidelines: Protected Expression, in which the first bracket is specifically "Journalism, Analysis, Education, and Advocacy".
mrcross.bsky.social
When someone goes
>"Ew! That's icky! I don't want to see that, or my kids!"
It's a pretty good counterpoint to say
>"You had to click past two warnings to view that, moron. Caveat emptor."
mrcross.bsky.social
Not everywhere. By specifying it, they're making the rules clear regardless of jurisdiction.
mrcross.bsky.social
I'm picking up what you're putting down, but I think I am more getting at that societal norms (at least in the the west) are turning against dub- and noncon content as our AFK expectations shift towards explicit consent. Not saying that makes it a right decision, but understandable.
mrcross.bsky.social
I like to believe the folks behind this spun out from Twitter because they believe they could make something better, not to sell out ASAP, and from earlier communication, I think ads are low on their priority list of monetization as opposed to memberships of some sort.
mrcross.bsky.social
If we want the big bad corpo mods to leave us be, then we have to prove that we can self-moderate by tagging properly and helping the people who don't want to see certain stuff.
mrcross.bsky.social
At the same time, reality imitates art. As the expectation of explicit consent over vague "Didn't say no" excuses grows in real life, is it not fair to expect artwork to be more explicit about the consent of the characters involved unless it's portraying non-consent to make a point?
mrcross.bsky.social
What about the updated guidelines makes you think that? If anything, they seem to have specified that scammy shit like most crypto is not welcome in the least.
mrcross.bsky.social
I think that would be an overreaction. Nothing about the terms kicks out furries, and we certainly haven't seen any bans on adult artists. For now, this is a pretty safe space for NSFW artists, and one with some pretty decent reach, too. :)
mrcross.bsky.social
I don't think that's a correct interpretation:
The wording of this text does not ban fantastical or cartoonish furries in the slightest. I think they went very specifically for this wording to protect furries while banning zoophiles, which I absolutely am on board with.
Clip from community guidelines saying "Do not create, share, or promote sexual content involving real animals or realistically depicted synthetic, simulated, illustrated, or animated versions."