@natejoseph.bsky.social
500 followers 210 following 96 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
natejoseph.bsky.social
Check out the new updated Free SOR Resources app on Teaching by Science:

www.teachingbyscience.com/free-sor-res...

I’ll be making a lot of additions to this over the next month. If you see something you feel is missing, please let me know.
Free SOR resources | Teaching By Science
www.teachingbyscience.com
Reposted
zahavastadler.bsky.social
I'm very proud to share a new, first-of-its-kind analysis and data tool from my team at @educationwork.newamerica.org.
Redrawing the Lines is a first-ever look at how, if states draw school district borders with equity as the goal, they can HUGELY reduce funding inequality and segregation. #edusky
Redistricting School Systems Can Increase Funding Fairness and Decrease Segregation
A new report and interactive data tool show how specific redistricting choices can create fairer school systems for our children.
www.newamerica.org
natejoseph.bsky.social
I just dropped these 5 free early-phonics workbooks. They cover basic consonant sounds and soft vowel sounds. They also include 25 decodable texts.

www.teachingbyscience.com/free-sor-res...
Free SOR resources | Teaching By Science
www.teachingbyscience.com
natejoseph.bsky.social
And how does that prove whole language works?
natejoseph.bsky.social
Her wrong interpretation of NAEP scores as a journalist, does not disprove the research done for decades showing Whole Language does not work.
natejoseph.bsky.social
That’s incredibly kind of you to say! I’m not sure I meet that standard though. But I’m honoured that you think so highly of me.
natejoseph.bsky.social
I have been a public opponent to charter schools and private schools for almost a decade.
natejoseph.bsky.social
I am not paid by the Waltons.
natejoseph.bsky.social
So you admit that there is a mountain of research against you. But you slander my paper without reading it. What an open minded and nuanced position.
natejoseph.bsky.social
Straw man. You have no nuance that you have suggested.
natejoseph.bsky.social
You cited a blog and a newspaper article. The England study is not an RCT or a meta. It’s correlational, not causative data. Scientific studies have consistently shown the same thing for decades. (NRP, 2000); (Camilli, 2003); (Steubings, 2008); (Torgerson; 2019). All found SP outperformed WL.
natejoseph.bsky.social
I’m a libertarian socialist. Next straw man please.
natejoseph.bsky.social
Great. Where’s your academic citation.
natejoseph.bsky.social
The reading wars debate is not over whether we have a reading crisis, it’s on WL or SP. If you say there is no science of reading, the logical conclusion is that you believe WL is superior to SP.
Reposted
sarahcordes.bsky.social
I'm hiring a postdoc to assist with creating a longitudinal dataset of state charter school funding laws. More info in the position description. Please share!
Cordes postdoc position description.pdf
drive.google.com
natejoseph.bsky.social
I just dropped 6 free morphology workbooks on Teaching by Science.

teachingbyscience.com/free-sor-res...

Check them out and let me know what you think! I will be doing updates, so your feedback will help me improve them over time!
Free SOR resources | Teaching By Science
teachingbyscience.com
natejoseph.bsky.social
Please show me your peer reviewed citation to suggest Whole Language is better than Systematic Phonics.
natejoseph.bsky.social
Ah great yes. A newspaper article. Please show me your peer reviewed study suggesting that Whole Language is better.
natejoseph.bsky.social
Science is a hoax? Are you suggesting that the decades of reading research suggesting systematic phonics is superior to whole language was all faked? You must have some really impressive citations to back this up?