Dr Nina Rogers
@ninarogers.bsky.social
310 followers 420 following 32 posts
Life course Epidemiologist & Public health researcher Research Fellow @LSHTM @PHILabLSHTM Visiting scientist @MRC_EPID
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Dr Nina Rogers
Reposted by Dr Nina Rogers
mrcepid.bsky.social
(1/4)
19 months after the introduction of the UK’s Sugar Drinks Industry Levy, households with children bought fewer sugary drinks!

But researchers also found that sugary drink purchases went up by 14% in households WITHOUT children.

Read - buff.ly/kgiuoAs
Reposted by Dr Nina Rogers
mrcepid.bsky.social
(1/6)

Takeaways can negatively impact the diet and diet-related health outcomes of local residents

Local authority urban planners can deny planning for new takeaways in management zones around schools

But what are the long term impacts of these exclusion zones?

Read - buff.ly/S04RDSP
Reposted by Dr Nina Rogers
evahyldgaard.bsky.social
Strong words from Ursula von der Leyen today:

“Science belongs to humanity. We must protect it, prioritize it, and give it the freedom it needs to flourish.”

At the launch of the EU’s “Choose Science - Choose Europe” initiative, she announced four key actions.

🧵1/3
ninarogers.bsky.social
Our research shows substantial sugar purchased from the category "milk & milk-based drinks" (although we didn't look at these separately). Plain milk is nutritious and not part of the consultation. Other exempt groups (eg: powders) could be considered bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjo...
bmjopen.bmj.com
ninarogers.bsky.social
A lower tax threshold (4g/100 ml) should reduce sugar intake given manufacturers reformulated drinks to just below the 5g /100ml. A step-wise graded system to incentivise lower sugar levels should be considered plus a higher tax on drinks with very high sugar (>10g sugar/100ml)
ninarogers.bsky.social
In conclusion, our comprehensive analysis of the UK SDIL, using multiple data sources to understand the health impacts of the sugar tax, suggests large population-wide benefits across the life-course starting with infants and children.
ninarogers.bsky.social
~ 2 years post-SDIL we find a 12% relative reduction in NHS hospital admissions for tooth extraction in children aged 0-18 years. ⬇️⬇️ greatest in infants/young children & regardless of deprivation. Hear me talking to
@BBCRadio4 www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/...
Inside Health - Can supervised toothbrushing fix the children's dental crisis? - BBC Sounds
Around a third of British children have tooth decay. Is supervised toothbrushing the fix?
www.bbc.co.uk
ninarogers.bsky.social
I led research on the health/dietary impacts of the UK SDIL and used different data to examine the impact of SDIL on: 1)purchasing of sugar from drinks, 2)sugar consumption in adults/children 3)obesity (primary school) 4) dental extractions 5) asthma. Here is what we found:
ninarogers.bsky.social
The Uk government are consulting on extending the UK sugar tax by 1) including milk-based drinks (previously exempt) and 2) Lowering the threshold of the tax to cover drinks with >4g sugar/100ml (previously 5g/100 ml). www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Reposted by Dr Nina Rogers
bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk
🆕"How can we make food that is good for health, societies, the planet and the economy?"

Richard Westcott talks to experts Jonathan Stieglitz, IAST, & @martinwhite33.bsky.social, @mrcepid.bsky.social, in this month's #CrossingChannels #Podcast

Listen: pod.fo/e/2c3eac
Reposted by Dr Nina Rogers
thebda.bsky.social
We were pleased to organise a Parliamentary discussion on sugar with the APPG for Dentistry and Oral Health and @oha-updates.bsky.social

Our Mick Armstrong spoke movingly about the shame and trauma of the families whose children need to have decayed teeth extracted in hospital.
Reposted by Dr Nina Rogers
jeanmadams.bsky.social
I think I spot some figures from @ninarogers.bsky.social paper where we reported a 12% reduction in admissions for severe dental caries in children following introduction of the levy (and maybe even Nina herself in the foreground there!).

nutrition.bmj.com/content/bmjn...
ninarogers.bsky.social
Thanks Jean, great to see our findings highlighted in parliament, as the principal piece of evidence for the success of SDIL on preventing tooth extraction in children. If only dental data from community settings was available to evaluate further!
Reposted by Dr Nina Rogers
ukaso.bsky.social
ASO attended a Parliamentary roundtable yesterday on the Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL), discussing its role in improving public health through sugar reduction.

Great to see @katfoodjenner.bsky.social from @oha-updates.bsky.social on the panel, sharing evidence of its impact and future potential.
Reposted by Dr Nina Rogers
jeanmadams.bsky.social
Impacts were greatest in the lowest income households (14% reduction) and those with children (13.7% reduction. These households also had the highest pre-intervention purchasing. So the levy may help reduce inequalities in diet and health.
Reposted by Dr Nina Rogers
jeanmadams.bsky.social
ICYMI: Our new paper on the impact of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy is out. 19 months after implementation, we found that households purchased 7.5g less sugar from soft drinks compared to expected - equivalent to a 2.6% reduction. nutrition.bmj.com/content/earl...
Background The WHO recommends taxes on sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs) to improve population health. We examined changes in volume of and amount of sugar in purchases of soft drinks according to household income and composition, 19 months following the implementation of the UK soft drinks industry levy.

Methods Data were from the Kantar Fast Moving Consumer Goods panel, a market research panel which collects data on weekly household purchases (mean weekly number of households=21 908), March 2014–November 2019. Interrupted time series analysis of volume and sugar purchases was used to estimate absolute and relative differences in the volume and amount of sugar in soft drinks, confectionery and alcohol purchased weekly by household income (<£20 000, £20–50 000 or >£50 000) and composition (presence of children (<16 years) in the household (yes or no)), 19 months after soft drinks industry levy (SDIL) implementation, compared with the counterfactual scenario based on pre-announcement trends and using a control group (toiletries).

Results By November 2019, purchased weekly sugar in soft drinks fell by 7.46 g (95% CI: 12.05, 2.87) per household but volumes of drinks purchased remained unchanged, compared with the counterfactual. In low-income households, weekly sugar purchased in soft drinks decreased by 14.0% (95% CI: 12.1, 15.9) compared with the counterfactual but in high-income households increased by 3.4% (1.07, 5.75). Among households with children, sugar purchased decreased by 13.7% (12.1, 15.3) but increased in households without children by 5.0% (3.0, 7.0). Low-income households and those with children also reduced their weekly volume of soft drinks purchased by 5.7% (3.7, 7.7) and 8.5% (6.8, 10.2) respectively. There was no evidence of substitution to confectionary or alcohol.

Conclusion In the second year following implementation of the SDIL, effects on sugar purchased were greatest in those with the highest pre-SDIL purchasing levels (low-income household…
Reposted by Dr Nina Rogers
socsocmed.bsky.social
🥁Abstract submission now live for this year's conference!🥁

Conference dates: Wednesday 10th - Friday 12th September 2025, with an ECR day on Tuesday 9th

Where: Bradford

Submit your abstract here: bit.ly/3PKGo2k

Submission deadline: 23:59 GMT, Monday 24th February 2025

📷 Neil Turner
Bradford City Hall, taken from the 8th floor seminar suite at the National Media Museum.