notfemme.bsky.social
notfemme.bsky.social
@notfemme.bsky.social
240 followers 1.4K following 1.5K posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
"the but" is very clear, you don't want them to have access to public loos.
the effect of your position, whether intended or not, is to punish gender non-conforming cis girls. they're the ones that will be routinely harassed every time they play a weekend sport
You support feminine-women only spaces. You certainly aren't going to accept trans men in the women's loos, you barely accept gender non-conforming cis women in the bathrooms
You're clearly scared of their existence and support policies that will exclude them from existing in public. All your arguments come down to, "I'm not sexist/racist etc but ...."
They're in Texas, Trans people have absolutely been forced out of public spaces.
How do people become this stupid - even fascists know they have to have some good points to throw meat at their supporters. Brute force only gets you so far
*sigh* I'm a cis woman. I just don't fit gender stereotypes. And you think you're not trans phobic.
You can't do that by dehumanising trans and gender non-conforming people. I don't think you think you are using their talking points, but you are. That's something you should explore if you are genuine
Then you might want to stop using their talking points.
it's more than that. Imagine being assigned female at birth, your parents send you to an All girls school, K-12 . When you're 14 you discover you have variations of sex characteristics and discover you have XY chromosomes. The biological sex ppl say you shouldn't be in All girls school.
It's more than that. There are people in the UK actively against All Gender toilets. It's not enough to ban gender non-conforming people from the loos, they don't even want All Gender toilets available
A lot of people are explicitly saying that trans people don't exist so I'm not sure why you think that's ridiculous
Except, you don't want the gender non-conforming girls to use the public women's loos.
It's more than that. The aim is to punish gender non-conformity, they want people that don't adhere to gender stereotypes to feel unsafe, unwanted and unwelcomed. They're not going to accept gender non-conforming women in single sex wards in hospitall (which aren't a thing in Australia anyway)
i don't think adults demanding 13 year old gender non-conforming girls prove they're girls is a good way to protect women's rights
I'm Australian but I have lived in UK and Australia. Anecdotally, UK is still way far behind gender non-conforming acceptance generally, before you even get to trans people .
Not really, effectively banning gender non-conforming cis women from the loos is not helpful to women. It's an excuse for acceptably feminine women to demand acceptably feminine spaces.
Indeed.. It's not an accident that this whole affair has been a disaster for trans men and all gender non-conforming cis women... they're the ones being told they must use the women's loos, but also that others are allowed to harass them for using the women's loos.
Idaho already let's religious parents kill their children so this isn't surprising
the same people would be saying, "Why did you give up your device if you wanted a job?"
They'll still demand the rest of us subsidise them when they inevitably fail to prepare for the droughts and floods they know are coming and failing to hedge against in good years
Why isn't the media reporting the Nationals abandonment of net zero as a commitment to Australia breaking international agreements the Coalition signed up for? #auspol
Why do these men want to investigate every single still birth?