noWay
@noway.gabb.fr
22 followers 110 following 32 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
noway.gabb.fr
Bob’s homeserver cached Alice’s DID→Matrix ID mapping upon initial resolution. Clients can either rely on the homeserver’s cached mapping when displaying the sender handle, or independently re-resolve the DID to verify the current Matrix homeserver and ensure the mapping remains valid.
noway.gabb.fr
But instead of an app.matrix.actor.mxid, we could just in fact add the mxid to the DID document… I didn’t think a lot about that solution even if it crossed my mind, I’ll try to think about it, thanks a lot!
noway.gabb.fr
The main reason was revocability.

By hosting a collection app.matrix.actor.revoked in the PDS, homeservers can subscribe to its firehose to be notified if a user’s DID-to-Matrix mapping changes, ensuring cached homeserver info stays up to date.
noway.gabb.fr
Just an idea :) One can always dream

I did it in a very short time but it allowed me to put all my thoughts on a diagram
diagram describing a potential did:plc implementation for the matrix protocol
noway.gabb.fr
I did this diagram so that one can understand the idea, I'm sorry if it's not up to tech standards, I'm not very used to it...

If you have recommendations or questions I would be glad to answer!
diagram describing a potential did:plc implementation for the matrix protocol
noway.gabb.fr
If this unstable MSC (github.com/matrix-org/m...) is one day implemented. We could identify users via ed25519 keys, and PDS could simply publish a mapping to the state key, allowing an homeserver to send and receive messages for the user.
MSC4243: User ID localparts as Account Keys by kegsay · Pull Request #4243 · matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals
Rendered
github.com
noway.gabb.fr
Knowing someone’s handle allow to resolve the user DID. You can set up handles by DNS as you mentioned but also by using the /.well-know/ method (please refer to the official documentation).

Homeservers could act as PDS but they could also allow users with their own PDS to use matrix.
noway.gabb.fr
I think I gave answer to your thinking in the replies of my post. I think AtProto could at the opposite allow decentralized accounts in matrix.

atproto.com/specs/handle
Handle - AT Protocol
A specification for human-friendly account identifiers.
atproto.com
noway.gabb.fr
Well it was working a few hours ago :(
noway.gabb.fr
OAuth is there!!!
noway.gabb.fr
Boom, account migration
noway.gabb.fr
We could also (far future) just consider matrix homeserver to be relays to store and forward messages.

All user messages are stored both in the PDS and on the homeserver. The homeserver can send and receive messages for the account as long as permitted by the PDS (until private key rotation).
noway.gabb.fr
That would solve the issue about private federation too.

Nobody is forcing you to use the Public Ledger of Credentials, private organisations could use their own and the /.well-known/ endpoints to resolve DID could be authenticated too to protect federation privacy.
noway.gabb.fr
Replacing @localpart:domain user identifiers by AP handles would be amazing.

Admins could choose to implement a PDS inside their homeserver and use the special /.well-known/ URL method to resolve the DID.

They could also choose to allow users with their own PDS to use their homeserver as a proxy.
noway.gabb.fr
Okay that’s fine. Have a good day
noway.gabb.fr
I think life costs are higher in Mississippi than in the UK, that could explain the wage difference.

We should compare spending power, what are your numbers?
Reposted by noWay
cassouman40.bsky.social
"Le fascisme ne se lève pas dans les pays développés comme la tempête en une nuit. Il est d'abord rampant, dissimulé, ordinaire. Il progresse par les mille voies de la haine, avivé par les difficultés économiques. Il s'empare des cœurs avant de pervertir les esprits puis de prendre le pouvoir."
noway.gabb.fr
(double posting so that the people who click on your repost can see what is this really about)
noway.gabb.fr
Hey, it would have been nice to reply to me directly rather than just reposting so that I could give you a proper answer :(

I’m not “white knighting“ anyone, I’m just saying that the poor creator of nooki who didn’t even ask for Jay’s support is not necessarily associated with all this drama
noway.gabb.fr
Hey, it would have been nice to reply to me directly rather than just reposting so that I could give you a proper answer :(

I’m not “white knighting“ anyone, I’m just saying that the poor creator of nooki who didn’t even ask for Jay’s support is not necessarily associated with all this drama
noway.gabb.fr
Are you really using GDP per capita as a metric?

I mean if you have five poor people earning 1000 dollars each and one billionaire, the GDP per capita will never represent anything meaningful.

A more interesting metric would be the median, it is free of this “big numbers“ effect.

Maths :)
noway.gabb.fr
She has nothing to do with it, it is an independent platform, just using the same protocol
noway.gabb.fr
I agree with you that they could block their AppViews and relays from sharing his content but you fundamentally can’t ban someone from a decentralized networks.

BlueSky right-leaning personalities could just start their own AppView are here they go again…