Wally
banner
nowooski.bsky.social
Wally
@nowooski.bsky.social
I mostly tweet on Twitter.
Should she be wearing a mask!?!? Does she hate disabled people?
June 14, 2025 at 4:23 AM
Turns out the “oh no, not work” guy looks like woke Sideshow Bob.
June 12, 2025 at 11:15 PM
If I am the Zohran campaign, I’m excited about the latest poll numbers but worried that non response bias is overestimating my support.

I’m also praying turnout is low. College whites are going to make it to the polls. But if the rest of the city turns out, Cuomo wins.
June 10, 2025 at 12:18 AM
Definitely also a confounding factor! Not one that goes in Zohran’s favor though.
June 10, 2025 at 12:13 AM
Zohran is cleaning up with college whites and losing with everyone else. If turnout is low enough — and NYC has low turnout primaries — he could win.
June 10, 2025 at 12:08 AM
lol. I didn’t realize people still tweeted like this. It’s like a brain frozen in 2018 was just thawed.
June 10, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Locking up the ~300 most psychotic anarchist protestor types who riot during every protest would be good for society AND good for progressive politics.

Letting the revolutionary cosplayers run wild and dominate the narrative is bad for everyone.
June 9, 2025 at 2:27 AM
LA riots are probably bad news for Zohran. He had a good week, but Cuomo is the law and order candidate.
June 9, 2025 at 2:26 AM
FYI: Today is the day you really want to go back to twitter
June 5, 2025 at 7:23 PM
None of this would have happened if fewer people voted.
April 7, 2025 at 3:49 AM
They are calling today a complete victory for Wally takes.
March 19, 2025 at 1:35 AM
If fewer people voted, Harris would have won.
March 18, 2025 at 3:01 PM
Extremely chaotic use of quotation marks on a this seating policy.
March 13, 2025 at 1:08 AM
All of this could have been avoided if fewer people voted.
March 10, 2025 at 8:08 PM
“Kuwait is a dry country!”

I never thought I’d live to see the day when conservatives are complaining the US state department doesn’t follow Sharia Law.
March 7, 2025 at 4:09 AM
As good a reason as any I suppose.
March 7, 2025 at 3:02 AM
“What do you think about Luigi?” turns out to be a good 1-question mental illness screen.
March 6, 2025 at 10:10 PM
I think it is totally plausible that marginal voters broke for Trump 66/33 in Michigan.

Also - wow, I knew turnout was up in swing states, but I didn’t realize just how high it was in MI. Up 6.6pp from 2020 to 77 percent.
March 4, 2025 at 10:11 PM
Marginal voters were more Trump friendly than in 2020. If turnout were lower, fewer marginal voters would have cast their ballots for Trump.

Harris probably would have won if turnout were 2-3 points lower nationally. If it were 2012 levels, it would have been a blowout.
March 4, 2025 at 7:11 PM
*reams of polling, not teams of polling.
March 4, 2025 at 2:10 AM
Here’s a piece I wrote for Noahpinion laying out the arg, though if you follow me on social media you’ll know I’ve been signing this tune since 2018. It just took a while for the conventional wisdom to acknowledge the new reality.

www.noahpinion.blog/p/dont-rock-...
Democrats benefit from low turnout now
Don't rock the vote.
www.noahpinion.blog
March 4, 2025 at 2:10 AM
When turnout is low — particularly in special elections, Dems
Overpreform.

Heck - a solid 6.8% of Trump voters didn’t bother to vote for the GOP senate candidate in swing states. Compare that to 0.1% drop off for Harris voters.
March 4, 2025 at 2:10 AM
Turnout was up in the swing states. We know from teams of polling that Trump preformed best with lower propensity voters, and voters who don’t follow the news.

We’ve seen evidence of this in basically every election of the Trump era. When Trump is on the ballot turnout is high and GOP does well.
March 4, 2025 at 2:10 AM
None of this would have happened if fewer people voted.
March 3, 2025 at 9:01 PM
Sounds good. Ship it.
March 3, 2025 at 12:31 AM