Barrista
@onbluskysku.bsky.social
1.9K followers 1.2K following 28K posts
Lawyer, Pittsburgher, reader of too few books, enjoyer of too many jokes
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Doesn’t need fixing, bad take
onbluskysku.bsky.social
I didn’t take it because I tested out on the AP, though I do remember we did hear about Brandenburg in HS, but does intro gov in college typically teach civil liberties in a way that the AP gov’t class does not?
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Yeah Baker gets you that districts must be similar in population, Shaw gets you that districts can’t be based on race outside of passing strict scrutiny. That seems important for understanding redistricting
onbluskysku.bsky.social
It’s not really about what’s most important in general as I see it. It’s about what’s most important for understanding the structure of the government. And rules for how members of Congress can get elected are part of that in a way that rules for what speech the government can punish are not
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Hope the feds enjoy winter
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Pretty sure @neorsd.org also deals with Cleveland Browns
onbluskysku.bsky.social
I think because it’s about the structure of how the government is formed not just general constitutional law
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Why? It isn’t a real recipe this is a meme someone made up to get you to resent it
onbluskysku.bsky.social
It’s pretty easy fwiw
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Well yes, it’s a made up screenshot specifically for meme content, not an actual recipe
onbluskysku.bsky.social
No, “they” didn’t, because this is ragebait generated specifically to joke about Jews stealing cultural foods from other places. It’s not an actual recipe on this site.
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Presidential immunity is not a feature of the US constitution it is a feature of John Roberts’ twisted mind, and the 5th Amendment is affirmatively good. Executive orders also aren’t part of the Constitution they’re just a feature of having a president at all
onbluskysku.bsky.social
This isn’t really a matter of the quality of a document. If you write the no doing fascism constitution and someone comes along and gets elected and pisses on it, it’ll fare about as well
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Which are thing. Anything is a thing. My brainstate that you’re a coward who can’t nut up to actually defending a point and hides behind wordplay is a thing, just like muting you, an action, is a thing
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Ok but it just happened. Like, in the thing you’re responding to. You’re looking at a spade and saying it ain’t a spade
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Yes a lack of a thing can be a cause. Cause of death? Lack of blood. Cause of this conversation? Your lack of a good case. Many such examples
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Concepts are things you absolute pedant
onbluskysku.bsky.social
You can choose to cancel them. My point is just that you can also define any ~x as y where ~x=y, such that now y is the affirmative and ~y is the negation but where ~y=x
onbluskysku.bsky.social
I said they aren’t metaphysically or ethically distinct. Not that they are the same thing. They’re just the same in the respects that matter here, which is metaphysics and ethics in terms of the ability to exert a political influence on the world
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Then you need to ask for your money back
onbluskysku.bsky.social
He didn’t cause them to lack blood? What are you his defense lawyer?
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Yes because these are distinct, affirmative. Zero is a number. It’s a thing. Just like one is a thing.
onbluskysku.bsky.social
I suppose Jack the Ripper never killed anyone he just caused them to lack blood
onbluskysku.bsky.social
Can you demonstrate that?
onbluskysku.bsky.social
No they aren’t have you taken a logic course? They come up all the time