Duncan Waldron
banner
ozalba.bsky.social
Duncan Waldron
@ozalba.bsky.social
430 followers 250 following 4.2K posts
Planetarium astronomer • Feckless dillettante • Scot-ish • Signatory to the Subject-Verb Agreement • Book: http://blurb.com/b/2211254-from… • Skinflint, First Class • Eukaryote • Slightly above just below average
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Thanks Rami. If it stays clear tonight, I'll take it to a darker sky and compare.
More #Seestar first impressions:

• …Pluto, at m<14.5, was visible after 3-4 minutes. Took it to 6m for this image. Stars as faint as m=15 (according to Stellarium) are visible.
• Battery discharged from 100% to 27% over 3-4 hours.

13/n 🔭
More #Seestar first impressions:

• …or because "stacking failed". Either way, some of my images had ~50% dropped exposures, others hardly any. 50% failure rate, for a long exposure, might be significant.
• The magnitude limit, even in a short (1-2 min) exposure was impressive. Pluto…/

12/n 🔭
More #Seestar first impressions:

• Re the last point: if it's a dim object, you might need to expose for a minute or more before you can assess if the aiming is good.
• Some exposures will be discarded from the live-stacking process; this can be because trailed stars were detected, or…/

11/n 🔭
More #Seestar first impressions:

•…so you'll need to ensure a good patch of sky is visible (I fell foul of that: one of its recalibration targets was behind a corner of my house, and I had to move the tripod again).
• It's not always on-target; instead of the Horsehead, it was beside M42.

10/n 🔭
More first impressions:

• you can start in one location in your backyard, then move to another location for a different object, but it will need to recalibrate and find its way again (especially: assessing the effective horizon, if the horizontal alignment is different, 2nd time around), so…

9/n 🔭
First impressions?

• It's a seductive beast, capable of producing images almost straight out of the box (after a quick look at the manual, natch)
• It will be good for showing the brighter deep-sky objects to the public, quickly.
• Even in a suburban sky, with limiting mag ~4, it works.

8/n 🔭
This has been my first serious attempt to get something out of the #Seestar S50, apart from quick tests in the daytime, and an abortive, cloud-stopped-play, session 10 months ago. It's a work scope, so I'll be collating the images and preparing notes for my colleagues ASAP.

First impressions? 7/n 🔭
…select the Stargazing menu item again. The scope was still on the same observing field, so by starting the image-stacking again, it ignored the comet to concentrate on the stars. Worth exploring this option, if you're struggling to get a comet with a #Seestar. Now, where's the RAW files…? 6/n 🔭
I'm hoping I can access the RAW files for these comet images, so I can create a properly stacked final image. It seems that any attempt to track a moving object like a comet, with the #Seestar, is likely to fail. My approach was to centre on the comet, quit & return to the start menu, then…/ 5/n 🔭
Two more attempts at C/2025 R2 (SWAN). The first, supposedly tracking the comet (while also presumably trying to stack the star field images), shows some non-uniform motion of the comet. The second, making no attempt to follow the comet, shows a more uniform comet trail plus sharp stars. 4/n 🔭
LDN 1795; near Baade's Window, at the boundary of Sagittarius & Scorpius, it needs more time to properly show the contrast between the dark molecular cloud and the brightness of star clouds near the galactic centre, but a tree got in the way… Also, open cluster Messier 7. 3/n 🔭
I let the camera run off 50, night before last, but there's nothing obvious. I'll have a harder look later though, just in case there's any tiddlers. It's been a long time since I tried meteor photography.
Large and Small Magellanic Clouds now, both of which are too large for the #Seestar S50 field of view; the S30 would be better. A measure of the relative brightness of LMC &SMC is that SMC had 4x exposure of LMC, for similar appearance in the image. 2/n 🔭
Another session with the #Seestar S50 last night. Getting a feel for what it can/can't do, but there's much to learn—including accessing/using the RAW files; maybe this weekend. Also need to test it in a dark sky, not suburban.

Here's 3x Orion neb w/ different exposures, and the Helix nebula. 1/n 🔭
So frustrating, especially with comet Lemmon available to you. Hope you get a glimpse soon.
I see what you did there. 👸
Good, good. I'll have access to the work scopes for another 2-3 years, so there's incentive for you :)

And the guest accommodation should be ready by then. It's a bit open the the elements atm 🤪
Would be good to give you a tour. I showed an Alaskan some of these things once; the Tarantula, in perfect seeing, was almost beyond words, and she was suitably impressed by omega Cen.

Come around this time of year, for Milky Way in early evening, then Crux, LMC & SMC in the early hours.
Thanks, Scary 😊 They turned out a lot better than my first attempt last December - 3 poor minutes on M42 and then cloud rolled in. Haven't managed (or found enthusiasm for it) since then.

Both of those comet pics are nice in their own way though.
Answer: a target that the telescope doesn't have trouble tracking. It kept failing on the comet, so I spent the evening having my first proper play with the Seestar 50 on more cooperative targets. 🔭
A glass of wine, a comet, and a smart telescope; what more could a person want? 🔭
There's a couple of images on Spaceweather, when it was near M16 & 17, which give a good idea of how faint the tail is: spaceweathergallery2.com/indiv_upload... and spaceweathergallery2.com/indiv_upload... 🔭
Comet C/2025 R2 (SWAN) With M16 & M17
spaceweathergallery2.com
As Archimedes said: "Give me where I may stand, and I shall make a merry quip."
Haven't had many clear skies lately, but tonight obliged so I pointed a camera at comet C/2025 R2 (SWAN). 16 6-second exposures, ISO-1600, f2.8.

In the photo, SWAN is comparable in brightness to M22, but through 9x63B, it was more like M23 appears in the photo. 🔭