Pawandeep Singh Kohli
@pdeep22.bsky.social
24 followers 37 following 2 posts
PostDoc Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern| PhD NIPGR, Delhi 🌱🌱🌱🌱 🧬🧬🧬🧬 Genomics, Quant gen, Data Science&ML
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Pawandeep Singh Kohli
gcbias.bsky.social
It is depressing, but all too predictable, how swiftly we’ve gone from the Social Science Genetic Association Consortium offering reassurances about the uses of behavioural polygenic scores to one of their lead authors marketing embryo selection for IQ
Text from an FAQ in Okbay et al 20222: 
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-022-01016-z 
a similar same statement is made in an FAQ in 2025: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.05.14.653986v1.supplementary-material
Text reads:
"The results of SSGAC studies have sometimes been used by online platforms, including some companies, to predict individual outcomes. We recognize that returning individual genomic “results” can be a fun way to engage people in research and other projects and to feed or stoke their interest in genomics. But it is important that participants/users understand that these individual results are not meaningful predictions and should be regarded essentially as entertainment. Failure to make this point clear risks sowing confusion and undermining trust in genetics research"