Prof Rausch
@profrausch.bsky.social
170 followers 160 following 34 posts
Passionate about open science, mechanics, teaching, and outreach. Faculty @UTAustin. Mostly silly content, some science, and a little bit of disc golf.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
profrausch.bsky.social
🚨🎉 Exciting news! I’ve taken on a new role as Associate Chair for Faculty Development in the Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics at UT Austin 🎉 🚨

This is my first formal administrative position. Wish me luck 😂.
profrausch.bsky.social
🚨 We have 2-3 post-doc openings and an opening for a lab manager, all in soft material/tissue mechanics. 🚨

Check out www.manuelrausch.com and submit an application here: lnkd.in/e7W27XwZ. Please share with interested parties and your network. Many thanks ❤️!
Soft Tissue Biomechanics Laboratory
www.manuelrausch.com
profrausch.bsky.social
If you'd like to receive regular updates on my lab's activities (academic and outreach), please sign up for our newsletter: manuelrausch.substack.com.

In our April issue, you'll hear from an alumni; I'll introduce a new lab member and spotlight one of our outstanding undergraduates.

Enjoy 🥰 !
The Soft Tissue Biomechanics Lab Substack | Manuel K. Rausch, PhD | Substack
News and Updates from the Lab, its friends, alumni, and colleagues. Click to read The Soft Tissue Biomechanics Lab Substack, by Manuel K. Rausch, PhD, a Substack publication. Launched 11 days ago.
manuelrausch.substack.com
profrausch.bsky.social
I have done this twice before, in 2021 and 2022. The recordings of those sessions are here (lnkd.in/e75j9tRz) and here (lnkd.in/edF6scuR).
profrausch.bsky.social
In 2023 and 2024, I was on the steering committee of the ASEE NSF CAREER workshop. Unfortunately, this program is not offered this year. Therefore, four recent NSF CAREER Winners and I have decided to put together an informal Q&A to support future CAREER winners!

Sign up here: lnkd.in/evq4bYnv
Reposted by Prof Rausch
profsuwmadison.bsky.social
UW-Madison on proposed NIH indirect cost cap: “This proposed change to NIH funding–UW–Madison’s largest source of federal support–will significantly disrupt vital research activity and delay lifesaving discoveries and cures related to cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, and much more.” 1/x
UW–Madison responds to NIH announcement about indirect cost cap
The following statement is in response to the federal directive issued on February 7, 2025 to change the Facilities and Administration (F&A) rate for all existing and ongoing new National Institutes o...
news.wisc.edu
Reposted by Prof Rausch
alexkarner.bsky.social
Have you been a victim of cancel culture??

DM/email me if you’ve had a transportation research project canceled in the past week. Affected work seems mostly to be XCRP but we’re interested in all funders.

Goal is to quantify the collective impact on the field and chronicle the undone science.
profrausch.bsky.social
I am sorry to hear that, dude. 💔
Reposted by Prof Rausch
annikabarber.bsky.social
If you are directly affected by a cancellation of a meeting you were scheduled to participate in or at which your grant may have been discussed, consider reaching out.
karenguzzo.bsky.social
ProPublica is interested in covering these developments and will keep communications private and secure. You can reach out to www.propublica.org/people/annie...
profrausch.bsky.social
My phone literally dies three times a day.
profrausch.bsky.social
Rumor has it NIH study sections are being cancelled in response to executive orders? Anyone have any specifics?
profrausch.bsky.social
Coming home after a full day of meetings:
profrausch.bsky.social
I see the pressure of raising funds leading many junior faculty to prioritize "money" over seemingly less urgent tasks, e.g., building a lab with well-trained students and a positive culture. Be careful: Like a house, your lab needs a strong foundation! Happy to chat with anyone seeking advice!
profrausch.bsky.social
We conclude our work by stating: "It is not without a sense of irony and awe that we make this recommendation, as 70 years of numerical method development and advancements in imaging technology have apparently not improved our ability to estimate fracture toughness from pure shear experiments." 🧵5/5
profrausch.bsky.social
We then compared them by three metrics: intra- and inter-approach variability, computational cost, and implementation complexity. The WINNER was what we called the Griffith A approach based on the work by Rivlin and Thomas (1953). 🧵4/5
profrausch.bsky.social
We next compared three broadly different approaches of extracting fracture toughness from these experiments. Some of the methods had multiple manifestation. In total we came up with six different ways (see our paper for all the details). 🧵3/5
profrausch.bsky.social
We first conducted (notched and untouched) pure shear experiments on blood clots. Of the notched samples, we varied the notch length. All data are openly available! 🧵2/5