When naming visual sequences, efficiency calls for parallel processing of successive items but this leads to interference that threatens performance. To manage the load, constant monitoring allows dynamic adjustment of parallelism, seen in eye-voice span and articulation.
dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0...

What I wish I knew: 33 thoughts for early career researchers
Reflections I wish someone had shared with me early in my research career.

predirections.substack.com/p/what-i-wis...

In two experiments we used a flanked masked (75 ms) visual word version of the visual world paradigm with five flanking conditions: none, repeated symbols, unknown font strings, pseudowords, and words. Flankers interfered with activation of the target word, more so for frequent words.

Skilled readers use information from upcoming words to boost efficiency, but at what cost? We discovered that nearby words interfere with lexical activation of the fixated word, calling for a more nuanced approach to the role of preview in fluent reading. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jm...

Hey guys! Thumbs up from me too :-)

LQ is not only about the detailed content. It also requires strong and redundant connections among the three domains.
As for improving them, I would say that reading is the established way.