Iftach Yakar
@quantumyakar.bsky.social
260 followers 270 following 270 posts
Quantum computing + information | Computer science | postgraduate @ HUJI
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Sometimes I just add “eigen” in front of a word and hope for the best.
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Almost forgot to summarize the paper in a meme (hi @dulwichquantum.bsky.social )

9/8
quantumyakar.bsky.social
🛰️ Global policies can crucially extend achievable QKD distances.
Local policies may not be optimal in real repeater networks.
Since these global policies are deterministic, they have no real-time overhead.
Next steps: adaptive policies or other EPPs.
7/8
quantumyakar.bsky.social
For large chains (>500 repeaters), global policies boost SKR by two orders of magnitude.
In some regimes, they make secret communication possible when local ones yield none.
6/8
Taken from Fig. 4 of our paper. These plots show how advantagous the global strategy is over the local ones. The further the curve drop - the larger the advantage for the global policy.

Different colours represent different local polices; different markers represent different amounts multiplexing - parallel links being created.
quantumyakar.bsky.social
We take a *global* view: optimize distillation across the entire chain to maximize SKR.
By randomly sampling global policies, we find "near-optimal" policies that consistently outperform the local ones, for given parameters.
5/8
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Recent protocols (e.g. Mantri et al. 2024, arXiv:2409.06152) use *local* policies - each repeater decides whether to distill based on local information (like estimated fidelity or Secret Key Rate - SKR)
4/8
quantumyakar.bsky.social
All this introduces noise, which can be mitigated through entanglement distillation (EPP): turning many noisy EPR pairs into fewer, high-fidelity ones.
The question is: when to distill?
Too early - we waste good EPR pairs; Too late - noise kills us.
3/8
A schematic depicting the process of entanglement distillation
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Quantum communication over large distances is hard due to photon loss, which grows exponentially with distance. Quantum repeaters solve this by dividing the channel into short segments, entangling neighbors, and recursively performing entanglement-swapping.
2/8
Figure from Mantri et al. 2024 http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06152

Figure 3: Schematic of a nested swapping protocol. We start with N elementary segments each of length l0. The red boxes represent a swapping operation. Based on the decision variable Di, distillation may be performed before a swapping operation. Each swapping operation doubles the length of the link. This process is repeated until an end-to-end link is established.
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Excited to share my first paper (w/ Michael Ben-Or)!
Quantum repeater protocols must decide when to perform entanglement-distillation - but should that decision be local or global?
We find that global policies can make or break secure communication. 🔑
1/8
arxiv.org/abs/2510.06737
AI slop featuring two quantum repeaters sharing entanglement. Just to get your attention... 😬
quantumyakar.bsky.social
“I know it sounds woo” 🤣
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Just published a Stim implementation of the [[16,4,4]] Tesseract code - the one used in Microsoft+Quantinnum's QECC experiment last year.
Simulation can be used to quickly benchmark the code under various parameters.

Contributions are welcome.
github.com/DeDuckProjec...
A plot showing the acceptance rate of the code under different noise parameters. X axis - number of rounds. Y axis - Acceptance rate A plot showing a comparison between the logical fidelity of the code under different noise parameters, with of without applying the error correction. X axis - number of rounds. Y axis - average fidelity
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Hate these.. probably better off spraying, though, at this stage of infestation
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Shot from my iPhone (and a very basic telescope)
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Just defended my thesis 😱
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Makes sense.
Now you just gotta make sure your IDE highlights that keyword and you’re golden!
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Is there anything more suspenseful than running a simulation when you don’t even know if the code you wrote is correct?
quantumyakar.bsky.social
I didn’t we could keep such a macro system coherent!
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Maybe the quantum advantage was these friends all along
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Do you think Miles would’ve felt the same regarding quantum information? ;)

BTW, regarding the “cool” - he has an album titled “birth of the cool”
quantumyakar.bsky.social
Overheard people at the office talking about Poisson variables.
Turns out they were talking about croissants.
🤦🏻‍♂️
quantumyakar.bsky.social
If I had to guess, I'd say that "high" favors high quality but can drop when your network connection is insufficient, while always-high insists on high quality anyway.