banner
resist369.bsky.social
@resist369.bsky.social
60 followers 88 following 41 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Thank you ever so much for this shining act of generosity and philanthropy. Truly, where would the world be without your opinion — and your impeccable timing when it comes to tax deductions? It’s heartening to see how seamlessly public virtue aligns with private benefit and self-investment.
Another Noema piece — same act, new costume. A “magazine of ideas” that’s really a mouthpiece for its owner’s investments in AI and synthetic biology. Ethics as décor, propaganda as prose, and a tax break on top. A fraud wrapped in philosophy.
We are starting to witness tantalizing glimpses of the net good that can be achieved via genetic editing. How far will we allow it to go?

Aryn Baker explores.

#geneediting #crispr
Editing Nature To Fix Our Failures | NOEMA
Gene editing may enable us to prevent a species from ever becoming extinct in the first place. But should we?
www.noemamag.com
Another Noema piece — same act, new costume. A “magazine of ideas” that’s really a mouthpiece for its owner’s investments in AI and synthetic biology. Ethics as décor, propaganda as prose, and a tax break on top. A fraud wrapped in philosophy.
The real AI divide isn’t freedom vs. control. It’s public protection vs. private exploitation. China regulates to guard citizens; Silicon Valley deregulates to expose them — then sells the harm back as “innovation” and “progress.”
Reposted
Bratton’s “European AI” piece reads like a libertarian-accelerationist remix of the Techno-Optimist Manifesto: deregulation as courage, critique as weakness, elite control as realism. It’s Peter Thiel politics in philosophical drag.
Bratton’s “European AI” piece reads like a libertarian-accelerationist remix of the Techno-Optimist Manifesto: deregulation as courage, critique as weakness, elite control as realism. It’s Peter Thiel politics in philosophical drag.
The Institute Berggruen’s staffing and fellowships often look like rewards to allies, political contacts, or high-profile figures, rather than genuine peer-reviewed merit.
As it is, the Institute functions less like a think tank and more like a clubhouse for the powerful, recycling wealth into influence without real accountability.
If the Berggruen Institute becomes more transparent and grounded in serious work, it can recover credibility. If it stays opaque, based on elite circuits, and prestige-driven, the public’s criticisms will only grow sharper.
Reposted
If Noema Magazine promotes tech fantasies without ethical considerations, we risk a future where innovation overshadows the well-being of our children. Balance is crucial. #futurism
1/8

It’s official: Noema Magazine is no philanthropic project. It’s a mouthpiece for tech fantasies at the expense of children’s future. Check the replies below for my critique & a list of the nonsense.
“As the dismal trends in American test scores make clear, our current approach is no longer serving students’ needs.”

—Greg Easley

#ai #education #school #teachers
WEF LOVES Nils Gilman

bsky.app/profile/resi...
Fabrizio in short:

• Elitist technocracy
• Facade of neutrality
• Overconfidence in institutions
• Blind to social consequences
• Weak empirical grounding

Selling a “Tech Mouthpiece Institute”,
Getting tax breaks to pushes elite agendas dressed up as ideas.
Reposted
Fabrizio in short:

• Elitist technocracy
• Facade of neutrality
• Overconfidence in institutions
• Blind to social consequences
• Weak empirical grounding

Selling a “Tech Mouthpiece Institute”,
Getting tax breaks to pushes elite agendas dressed up as ideas.
Fabrizio in short:

• Elitist technocracy
• Facade of neutrality
• Overconfidence in institutions
• Blind to social consequences
• Weak empirical grounding

Selling a “Tech Mouthpiece Institute”,
Getting tax breaks to pushes elite agendas dressed up as ideas.
The article hypes “alpha schools” using ADL, but their results aren’t peer-reviewed. Success comes from $65k fees + 1:4 ratio, not AI. What they want is gov money for tools that risk delivering brain damage to everyone else.
Noema has a pattern: dress tech ideology in mysticism, misuse science, and sell it as philanthropy. It’s not inquiry, it’s propaganda for elites — promising futures that never come, while cashing in on the present.
Reposted
Think the food in the back of your refrigerator is old? These brave souls collect—and eat—military rations from as far back as the Civil War.

🔗: on.wsj.com/4mC4MBg
5/5 Real philosophy honors differences. Real science resists metaphysical inflation. Real spirituality refuses to be reduced to algorithms. Consciousness is not code — and dressing propaganda as harmony doesn’t change that.
4/5 Why do that? Because if you convince people consciousness = code, then AI can be called “conscious,” biotech becomes our destiny, and transhumanism looks inevitable. That’s not neutral philosophy — it’s ideology.
3/5 Equating them is a category error:
– Awareness ≠ information.
– Subject ≠ quantum detector.
– Metaphor (“light” in Vedānta) ≠ photons or code.

Blurring these lines makes contradictions look like harmony.
2/5 But notice the move:
– Vedānta: awareness is ultimate reality, self-luminous.
– Neuroscience: consciousness is an emergent property of biology.
– Quantum physics: “observers” are just physical systems, not subjects.

These views don’t converge.
1/5 Noema’s new piece looks “deep” but is really soft propaganda for transhumanism. It tries to merge Hindu philosophy, brain science, and quantum physics into one story: consciousness is just information.
Reposted
"Leadership is not about clinging to the old playbook. It’s about recognizing when the playbook needs to change."

At @nydailynews.com, retired lieutenant commander Shamsul Haque, a 21-year veteran of the NYPD, endorses our campaign for Mayor.
Why this cop backs Zohran Mamdani
New York City is at a crossroads. For years, we’ve endured recycled leadership and outdated approaches to public safety. We face real challenges — rising costs of living, homelessness, mental healt…
www.nydailynews.com
Reposted
More than 1,000 filmmakers, actors and industry professionals, including prominent Hollywood figures, like Olivia Colman, Ava DuVernay and Tilda Swinton, have signed a pledge not to work with certain Israeli film institutions.
Hollywood Actors and Directors Pledge to Boycott Israeli Film Institutions
In an open letter, Javier Bardem, Olivia Colman and other stars pledged not to work with Israeli film companies that, in their view, “are implicated in genocide.”
nyti.ms