jacob riyeff
@riyeff.bsky.social
430 followers 290 following 1.2K posts
translator, teacher, poet, frequenter of nature preserves, lover of very old poetry, non-tenure-track professor, benedictine oblate. ubi spiritus? ubi fruitio?
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
riyeff.bsky.social
the digital problems aren't really problems in your day if you don't think about nor rely on the internet much in your day.
riyeff.bsky.social
some activities are not improved by "saving time" doing them.
Reposted by jacob riyeff
benedictinesisters.bsky.social
New at Monastery Creations: Sister Jane’s handcrafted Bloom & Bough Soap Bundles! These four-soap bundles are elegantly wrapped by hand with carefully chosen embellishments. Choose from two categories: Harvest of Blessings or Rustic Roots. Shop today at monasterycreations.com/collections/...
riyeff.bsky.social
hear, hear!
shannonvallor.bsky.social
Therefore both ‘general intelligence’ and ‘intelligence’ have already outlived the (limited) scientific usefulness they had, and it’s high time to put them on the relic shelf next to phlogiston. Or behind it. At least phlogiston wasn’t invented by eugenicists.
riyeff.bsky.social
6th day before the nones of october.
9th moon. (waxing gibbous)
off to the baraboo hills tomorrow!
riyeff.bsky.social
kalendis octobris!
8th moon.
riyeff.bsky.social
is any of this 'openai is not saving the world but just doing usual internet stuff w/ their software' even worth saying? did anyone ever/does anyone now think that's really what they were doing?
riyeff.bsky.social
þæs ofereode; þysses swa mæg.

(—deor)
riyeff.bsky.social
read f.a. hayek's "the atavism of social justice" yesterday.
dear reader, unkind words issued from my mouth.
riyeff.bsky.social
pridie kalendas octobris.
waxing gibbous.
+st. honorius, companion and successor of st. augustine of canterbury.
riyeff.bsky.social
best half-line from today's #oldenglish reading: "gyllende gryre" (with shrieking horror).
riyeff.bsky.social
i had a quiet, mostly solitary day friday for the first time in a looooong time. completely agree.
Reposted by jacob riyeff
davidrosenthalpoet.bsky.social
The Bearded Bards of BlueSky are back!!!!

Join us online for two readings featuring stellar lineups of amazing poets and writers to raise funds for @translifeline.org.

Check out the website for details (including zoom registration link):

beardedbardsofbluesky.weebly.com
Bearded Bards
Of BlueSky

Online readings to raise funds for Tans Lifeline.

November 8, 2025
Featuring:
Todd Dillard
Brian Spears
Matthew E. Henry
James McConachie
David J. Bauman
Jonathan Everitt

December 13, 2025
Featuring:
Jared Beloff
Barlow Adams
Dan Murphy
upformsumdirt
Gregory Crosby
J-T Kelly

5:00-6:45 est / 2:00-3:45 pst 

https://beardedbardsofbluesky.weebly.com
riyeff.bsky.social
reading _the seafarer_ next in the #oldenglish group.
reminded of ezra pound's reading of his #translation. if you've never heard it, it's worth a listen. whew!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ylM... #poetry #poem
EZRA POUND reads "The Seafarer"
YouTube video by Poets Speak
www.youtube.com
Reposted by jacob riyeff
thetattooedprof.bsky.social
My latest column for the Chronicle of Higher Ed is now live. It's an argument for including AI-critical voices in campus conversations and policymaking workgroups, and I'm proud to get this dissenting piece into the mainstream genAI/higher ed discourse. Please read and share if you're so inclined 🙂
Advice | Sometimes We Resist AI for Good Reasons
Why higher ed needs to listen to the contrarians in setting policies on using tools like ChatGPT in faculty work.
www.chronicle.com
riyeff.bsky.social
at this point in my life, when i have a big thing to write, it's kind of fun watching to see when i'll finally start.
(dear reader, it is not today.)
Reposted by jacob riyeff
charleswlogan.bsky.social
No, you do not need to add these technologies to your repertoire - especially to write IEPs - and rather than invest in and solidify Big Tech's capture of education, may I suggest using that money to support relationships between teachers and students unmediated by OpenAI, Microsoft, and Anthropic?
aft.org
AFT @aft.org · 18d
AI is here, and it has the potential to change education. But we can't let tech companies call the shots.

We're leading the charge to ensure that AI is used as a tool to support educators & students, not replace them. That means establishing guardrails for safety, privacy + ethics.
Reposted by jacob riyeff
trisnorton.bsky.social
Greater Sea-spurrey Spergularia media (with Sea Aster Tripolium pannonicum), and Lesser Sea-spurrey Spergularia marina. Hampshire and West Sussex coasts, yesterday. @bsbibotany.bsky.social
riyeff.bsky.social
favorite #oldenglish word from today's study of "exodus": blodegesan. (of blood-terror)
riyeff.bsky.social
10th day before the kalends of october.
29th eccl'l moon.
+st. otho, ocso, bishop of the frisians.
Reposted by jacob riyeff
olivia.science
Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues. Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe. Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles