Ursula ๐ŸŒธ๐Ÿฆ‡
banner
sabokat.com
Ursula ๐ŸŒธ๐Ÿฆ‡
@sabokat.com
"Don't believe this girl, she preaches mayhem. She's the devil's bitch and a liar."

Southern anarchist genderfuck playing slow riffs and hating the cops. they/them
If you can see this and want to continue being mutuals, I'm moving accounts: @hatesound.bsky.social
March 12, 2025 at 9:52 PM
this is a completely fucked up system, imo. But now that I understand the stakes (apparently your entire account can be essentially disabled for pissing off the wrong people) i'll be more careful. One strike policy is pretty fucking nuts though
March 12, 2025 at 9:51 PM
I won't lie to y'all, I'm pretty fucking bummed that @support.bsky.team / moderation / whoever have permanently labeled this account I was building "rude" over a fucking argument.
March 12, 2025 at 9:50 PM
if u can see this, i guess bluesky's total lack of response to my appeal and follow up email means I have to abandon this account. Find me here instead: @hatesound.bsky.social
March 7, 2025 at 6:02 PM
yeah i've been permanently labeled as "rude" because I got into an argument with a liberal
March 7, 2025 at 5:48 PM
i'm pickle rick!
March 7, 2025 at 2:59 PM
If you can see this, please interact โ€” just trying to understand how this moderation works!

Bluesky moderation has labeled me a "rude spammer" for getting into an argument. I think this means my posts are hidden by default for most people.
March 7, 2025 at 1:47 AM
Iโ€™m so fucking sick of being asked to be polite to condescending pricks.
February 28, 2025 at 2:50 AM
This ride sounds so goooooood
February 28, 2025 at 1:16 AM
There was a drastic shift after they hired John Boyle as their first and only paid โ€œreporterโ€
February 27, 2025 at 11:58 PM
lol I just realized I used the word โ€œbeliesโ€ when I meant the exact fucking opposite
February 27, 2025 at 9:09 PM
There is a 24โ€ Paiste 2002 ride in this box, about which I am hella stoked.
February 27, 2025 at 7:16 PM
But those people are marginalized by the Democratic Party, which is who I was generalizing as โ€œliberalsโ€
February 27, 2025 at 6:42 PM
Sure, Iโ€™d say that democratic socialists who want to reform liberal capitalism to be more in line with the personal liberties and inalienable rights aspects of the ideology are โ€œprogressive liberalsโ€
February 27, 2025 at 6:41 PM
I mistakenly assumed more people on understood the definition of liberalism. My bad
February 27, 2025 at 6:40 PM
My overarching point was the we use the word โ€œliberalโ€ to mean โ€œleftist-liteโ€ when we shouldnโ€™t. It should be understood as the status quo that the right is currently destroying. โ€œLiberalsโ€ (Dems) want to restore it. Leftists want to replace it. Thatโ€™s all Iโ€™ve been saying.
February 27, 2025 at 6:32 PM
I was trying, but the dumbass void keeps screaming back
February 27, 2025 at 6:29 PM
there are character limits that prevented me for giving a full definition
February 27, 2025 at 6:27 PM
It is a view that is commonly held within my circles (people who spend their free time reading political theory)

but i was clearly mistaken as to how common of an understanding it was
February 27, 2025 at 6:26 PM
thanks for the link, the first paragraph sums up the definition of liberalism that I'm using.
February 27, 2025 at 6:25 PM
People regularly seem confused about this, so I'll clarify: I am not a rhetorical diplomat. I tried that approach for a lot of years, it never worked, and just resulted in my own frustration and lack of results.

I am a rhetorical bomb-thrower.
February 27, 2025 at 6:24 PM
HELLO I AM A WHITE MAN. I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOUR POINT THEREFORE YOU ARE STUPID. I WILL NOW FILL YOUR INBOX WITH NONSENSE, STRUT AROUND LIKE A PIGEON, AND BELIEVE I'VE ACCOMPLISHED SOMETHING TODAY
February 27, 2025 at 6:21 PM
Oh am I?
February 27, 2025 at 6:20 PM
Could have fooled me
February 27, 2025 at 6:20 PM
Whatโ€™s more frustrating than watching liberals molt into conservatives in real time is the fact that they are in total denial about it
February 27, 2025 at 6:16 PM