salazar64.bsky.social
@salazar64.bsky.social
That, on its own, is enough to justify hard questions, board-level investigations, and a reckoning across the young American right about who is truly in this for the cause—and who is in it for the cash.

projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/o...

#FollowTheMoneyTPUSA
Turning Point Usa Inc - Nonprofit Explorer - ProPublica
Since 2013, the IRS has released data culled from millions of nonprofit tax filings. Use this database to find organizations and see details like their executive compensation, revenue and expenses, as...
projects.propublica.org
December 7, 2025 at 3:19 AM
Whether or not the policy ultimately pays out something like $30 million to Erika, the underlying pattern is already clear: a flagship conservative youth nonprofit leveraged complex financial engineering to prioritize insiders’ security over transparent stewardship.
December 7, 2025 at 3:18 AM
Demand real governance. A nonprofit that preaches small government and accountability but uses donor funds for luxury travel and opaque wealth-transfer schemes is asking you to live by standards it does not impose on itself.
December 7, 2025 at 3:18 AM
For young TPUSA and Candace Owens supporters, the financial lesson is blunt: • Follow the filings, not the slogans. IRS Form 990s, state LLC records, and insurance structures often tell a very different story than stage speeches and “movement” branding
December 7, 2025 at 3:17 AM
Was donor intent respected? Most TPUSA donors likely believed their money funded campus activism, media content, and organizing, not a sophisticated life-insurance play subsidizing a founder’s family estate plan. #NonprofitAccountability
December 7, 2025 at 3:17 AM
If Erika is indeed positioned to receive a sum vastly in excess of TPUSA’s recovery, the board should be able to explain why this is a fair use of donor funds.
December 7, 2025 at 3:17 AM
The public filings show a $350,000 split-dollar loan but not the actual death benefit allocation between TPUSA and the beneficiary.
December 7, 2025 at 3:16 AM
TPUSA and Erika Kirk have reportedly not responded to requests for comment about who proposed the structure, who negotiated it, and how the board evaluated conflicts of interest. • How was the benefit split defined?
December 7, 2025 at 3:16 AM
Those are serious allegations that go beyond what the documents alone prove. The evidence-supported questions are sharp enough without conspiracy: • Who initiated the split-dollar policy?
December 7, 2025 at 3:15 AM
Unanswered Questions Young Conservatives Should Press

The assassination and the timing of the LLC’s dissolution have spawned intense speculation, including the claim that Erika engineered the policy and stands to profit disproportionately.
December 7, 2025 at 3:15 AM
In that context, the split-dollar policy looks less like “key-man” protection for the mission and more like a backdoor wealth-transfer mechanism financed with donor dollars. #ConservativeEthics
December 7, 2025 at 3:14 AM
It is operating like a political lifestyle brand with a tax exemption.
December 7, 2025 at 3:14 AM
Put simply: an organization spending tens of millions on luxury-esque travel and flashy events, while simultaneously structuring a life-insurance loan that advantages its founder’s family, is not behaving like a lean grassroots nonprofit.
December 7, 2025 at 3:14 AM
• The same analysis shows that travel and conventions alone absorbed about $29 million, dwarfing what most donors would imagine as “program work” and illustrating a culture of VIP travel, major events, and personal branding.
December 7, 2025 at 3:13 AM
• The Form 990 commentary notes that TPUSA spent roughly $91 million in 2023, including huge travel and convention costs, while leaving relatively modest cash on hand, suggesting a low-reserve, high-burn model.
December 7, 2025 at 3:13 AM
TPUSA’s Cash, Spending, and Risk Profile
The insurance arrangement does not exist in a vacuum; it sits inside a financial structure that already looks stress-tested.
December 7, 2025 at 3:12 AM
Legally, these deals can be structured to comply with IRS rules. Ethically, especially for a youth-focused political nonprofit preaching fiscal responsibility, they are a flashing siren.
December 7, 2025 at 3:12 AM
If a donor-funded nonprofit is fronting large premium payments so that a founder’s spouse can later receive many millions tax-advantaged, the line between fair compensation and private enrichment gets thin.
December 7, 2025 at 3:12 AM
Tax and estate-planning literature notes that the IRS overhauled split‑dollar rules precisely because these structures were used to heavily subsidize wealth transfers to insiders under the guise of compensation.
December 7, 2025 at 3:12 AM
The remaining death benefit goes to the individual’s heirs or trusts as a private windfall.
December 7, 2025 at 3:11 AM
In the typical loan-regime, collateral-assignment model common in nonprofits, the organization “loans” premium payments to the executive or their entity, secures an interest in the policy, and expects to recover its premiums (plus interest) from the death benefit.
December 7, 2025 at 3:11 AM
• Split-dollar life insurance is a tax and compensation strategy where an employer (here, a nonprofit) and an individual (here, the executive or a related LLC) share the costs and benefits of a permanent life insurance policy.
December 7, 2025 at 3:11 AM
How Split-Dollar Life Insurance Works in Nonprofits. To understand why this is controversial, it helps to know how these deals normally work.
December 7, 2025 at 3:10 AM
• The policy value and final death benefit structure are not publicly disclosed; the “$30 million” figure is an outside estimate, not a filed number.
December 7, 2025 at 3:10 AM
So, factually:
• There is documentary evidence TPUSA advanced $350,000 in a split-dollar life insurance arrangement through GGLF 2023 LLC linked to Kirk.
December 7, 2025 at 3:10 AM