Sander Van de Cruys
@sandervdc.bsky.social
300 followers 400 following 9 posts
Like most psychologists, I like people, in theory. My pages: sandervandecruys.be
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
sandervdc.bsky.social
New post on the seductions of AI conversations: Cold humans and warm machines
www.thereisnoreward.com/p/cold-human...
Reposted by Sander Van de Cruys
edwardvessel.bsky.social
A starter pack for empirical aesthetics and neuroaesthetics! A small start, but I’m sure it will grow. I will add more folks as I find them. Ping me with your additions. #neuroaesthetics #empiricalaesthetics

go.bsky.app/HKuJYiw
Reposted by Sander Van de Cruys
devezer.bsky.social
Intriguing post. I don't agree with everything Munger says, nor want to discuss specific points that seem to be of personal nature. But some of his observations about #metasci are on point, such as the distinction btw wanting to persuade colleagues vs imposing how everyone needs to do science. >
Do Something Else
Lakens and the Second Reformation
kevinmunger.substack.com
Reposted by Sander Van de Cruys
joberv.bsky.social
Prefaces of books I probably will never write.

Installment B: Being Bo(h)rn

Best phrase: "Two brother’s wonder at the straight lines thought by somebody with a back so crooked."

open.substack.com/pub/thereisn...
Being Bo(h)rn
Preface B
open.substack.com
Reposted by Sander Van de Cruys
joberv.bsky.social
Prefaces of books I probably will not write.

Installment A: an autistic history of philosophy.

Best phrase: “They clearly never met me with my mother”.

open.substack.com/pub/thereisn...
An Autistic History of Philosophy
Preface A
open.substack.com
sandervdc.bsky.social
Thanks for sharing, many discoveries for me here! Can I propose Nguyen's "Games as the art of agency"? And maybe my own recent work on Order & change in art: royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...
royalsocietypublishing.org
sandervdc.bsky.social
👀Out now: A new open access publication in Phil. Trans. B with Jacopo Frascaroli and Karl Friston. We examine why we are grasped by art, and we end up exploring the essential tension in living beings between order and change. royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...
Check out the special issue!
Reposted by Sander Van de Cruys
attackerman.bsky.social
It’s so hard not to screenshot all of Doppleganger by Naomi Klein but this point is so crucial.
I can’t type out this entire page but Klein is making the critical point that liberalism, as an ideology of capitalism, is the thinnest guardrail against fascism because its atomized exaltation of the individual is bound to fail the faithful when they encounter structural exploitations, deprivations and repressions that undergird capitalism. It really is socialism or barbarism
sandervdc.bsky.social
Yes! That would be worth digging into. The counts are normalized by nb of books published, but I also had no idea that the concept is that old. Its use might have morphed though. There is some history in this excellent analysis: harpers.org/archive/2021... Not nearly going that far back though.
Bad News, by Joseph Bernstein
Selling the story of disinformation
harpers.org
sandervdc.bsky.social
I tend to use Google ngram viewer for this (cut-off at 2019 but the trends are clear)

books.google.com/ngrams/graph...
Reposted by Sander Van de Cruys
katestarbird.bsky.social
As Karl Weick explained, “how do I know what I think, until I see what I say?” And in writing, this is where we’re finally forced to make hard decisions about structure and to articulate concrete relationships between ideas. We may lose that when AI fills in those thoughts for us.
gbbranstetter.bsky.social
This from Rebecca Solnit is my biggest fear about AI. Writing teaches me about myself, and I can't imagine handing that over to a machine whose only incentive is monetizing every aspect of my life. But many people will make that bargain, sacrificing their own self-awareness in the process.
Are there certain parts of the writing process that you can't really imagine AI replicating? Or can you just talk a little bit about the kind of labor that goes into writing the work that you do?

I'm a writer because I want to write. I don't want a machine to do it for me. I'm a writer because the process of writing is creative in what I do with language, but also in how I understand the subject. I often feel that I don't think hard enough about things until I have to write about them. Often my understanding changes in the process of writing. That's exciting for me. That's my own development, which, ideally, is somehow also something I can share with the readers.

I'm engaging in thinking, and what is the point of handing the job of thinking itself over, of understanding something more deeply, seeing the pattern that underlies? Why would I want to give up that profound experience?
Reposted by Sander Van de Cruys
jaanaru.bsky.social
Insight is not some 'special' process studied only on the fringes of experimental psychology. Having an "Aha!" leaves a mark on the person's mental world and thus has real consequences for behavior. Great paper!