Scholastica
@scholasticahq.bsky.social
1.1K followers 640 following 430 posts
Easy-to-integrate journal peer review, production, and hosting solutions to help scholarly publishers work smarter (used by 1,300+ journals). Law review updates: ‪@scholasticalr.bsky.social‬ For product details, visit our website: scholasticahq.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
scholasticahq.bsky.social
We've created a Scholastica Community starter pack to connect with our users and help editors, journals, and publishers connect with each other.

We’d love to know if you’re a Scholastica user on Bluesky! Drop us a line in the comments and we'll add you.

go.bsky.app/B3b5HYx
scholasticahq.bsky.social
✨ Scholastica user spotlight:

This Friday, we're flashing back to an interview with @illinoispress.bsky.social about steps they've taken to streamline journal operations in recent years. buff.ly/26d5ZhM
scholasticahq.bsky.social
Finally, don't forget to thank your reviewers by email and via reviewer recognition initiatives. Everyone appreciates acknowledgment! 🙏

Have additional tips? Let us know! #peerreview #scholarlypublishing
scholasticahq.bsky.social
3️⃣ Provide reviewer training opportunities

Many researchers grapple with feelings of imposter syndrome early in their careers, especially when diving into peer review. Promoting reviewer training opportunities can help those starting out gain the skills and confidence they need.
scholasticahq.bsky.social
^ Journals can also offer unconscious bias prevention training — leading to the next point!
scholasticahq.bsky.social
2️⃣ Help reviewers recognize conscious and unconscious biases

Journals should remind reviewers to be mindful that everyone harbors implicit biases that could impact their decision-making and provide tips for spotting and addressing biases.
scholasticahq.bsky.social
Your editors can also create a reviewer checklist (i.e., a manuscript assessment rubric). Add your reviewer guidelines and/or checklist to your website for easy access. ✔️
scholasticahq.bsky.social
1️⃣ Offer comprehensive reviewer guidelines

Provide clear reviewer guidelines that include an overview of your editorial process (e.g., peer review style, usual rounds of review), ethical policies, and criteria for publication.
scholasticahq.bsky.social
Is your journal giving peer reviewers the support they need?

Most scholars embark on review assignments with little to no formal training, so it's essential for editorial teams to help set them up for success. Quick 🧵👇
scholasticahq.bsky.social
🧐 Considering adopting CRediT?

This webinar covers how the @nisoinfo.bsky.social standard can help you increase publication transparency, and includes implementation case studies from Beth Craanen @acs.org and @evanko.bsky.social @theaacr.bsky.social: buff.ly/q6tGGNr
scholasticahq.bsky.social
At Scholastica, we decided there should be an easier way for journal editors to check on segments of manuscripts in need of attention at different stages of peer review.

So, we introduced Saved Manuscript Table Views to our peer review system: buff.ly/5NkyeS1

Here's a quick look. ⬇️
scholasticahq.bsky.social
Be sure to also share updates about commentaries you publish or roundups of related research you curate via your journal social media channels and those of your editors as applicable (remember, editors can be great co-promotion partners!).
scholasticahq.bsky.social
3️⃣ Repromote past articles

As you're taking steps to resurface relevant articles, remember to include them in your ongoing promotion strategy, especially when it comes to social media.

Pinpoint articles on timely and evergreen topics to repromote (e.g., post past article spotlights).
scholasticahq.bsky.social
For example, @emeraldpublishing.bsky.social launched an initiative to align its publications with the UNSDGs as part of its commitment to promoting real-world impact. One step they've taken toward that aim is creating resource pages on SDG topics with links to related articles from Emerald journals.
scholasticahq.bsky.social
2️⃣ Group past content on timely themes

If you previously published multiple articles about a specific research area that is especially timely now, consider featuring them on a themed resource page to resurface all that valuable content to readers.
scholasticahq.bsky.social
Our first tip is to invite commentary pieces (typically around 1,000 words) on notable past articles you've published. To promote robust scholarly dialogue, you can also ask the author(s) of the commentary subject to write a rejoinder.
scholasticahq.bsky.social
1️⃣ Invite commentaries on notable articles

The most popular articles are often the most controversial ones. They introduce novel concepts or challenge prevailing assumptions, leaving readers eager to dig deeper into the topic at hand. So why not have scholars revisit them in the future?
scholasticahq.bsky.social
Only about 10% of an iceberg is visible at a time — the rest is below the surface. Your journal is the same, with so much content to explore beyond your latest issue!

That's why it's essential to resurface past articles at relevant times so readers know they’re there! Quick 🧵👇
scholasticahq.bsky.social
Are you working to develop an OA journal publishing program at a scholarly society or academic institution?

We cover tips to help in this free guide: buff.ly/ncjycpB

#OpenAccess #ScholarlyPublishing
scholasticahq.bsky.social
Journals Director at @hopkinspress.bsky.social, Bill Breichner, discusses the Press's experience participating in @projectmuse.bsky.social's S2O initiative and his hopes for the future of the program in a new #ScholasticaCommunityConvo interview.

Read it here: buff.ly/KfxURpl
scholasticahq.bsky.social
Who says @peerreviewweek.bsky.social conversations have to be over?!

Scholastica's CEO and Co-Founder, Brian Cody, and Head of Marketing and Community Development, Danielle Padula, discuss key takeaways from #PRW2025 and other recent industry events in this new water cooler chat: buff.ly/ImDPbka
scholasticahq.bsky.social
Did you miss Scholastica's free @alpsp.bsky.social session on streamlining peer review to production handoffs?

You can catch the recording here: buff.ly/ABSFe2K

The webinar covers optimization opportunities from both a process and technical perspective.
scholasticahq.bsky.social
"The question of how, and under what conditions, published science is used to train LLMs is not just about copyright. It is about who controls the future of knowledge."

Director of @mitpress.bsky.social, Amy Brand, discusses science dissemination in the AI era: buff.ly/exNJgaX