shimmyshake72.bsky.social
@shimmyshake72.bsky.social
Reposted
It was this kind of insanity that solar was supposed to help greenhouse issues.
Have they sold off the oaks for biofuel to feed into the bottomless pit of AI ???
November 25, 2025 at 7:08 AM
Reposted
Seedlings? Why bother??
Oaks grow so slowly.
This is criminal.
November 25, 2025 at 7:26 AM
Reposted
If you're cutting down trees--especially slow-growing trees--in order to put up solar panels, you're doing something wrong. There are plenty of places to install solar, that have double benefits: over parking lots, over irrigation canals, etc.
November 25, 2025 at 6:34 AM
Reposted
But we need energy for data centers to train ai models which will become god like and teach us how to stop deforestation!

Don’t you understand? Abundance, yimby, and so forth! The future is tomorrowwwww and beyyyyonnnddddd!!!
November 25, 2025 at 6:26 AM
Reposted
clearly we cannot afford to cut more large trees. plant more trees. create more efficient ways to use solar power
November 25, 2025 at 6:02 AM
Reposted
If you are cutting down trees to install solar panels, you have a fundamental misunderstanding about the dynamics of human induced climate change.
November 25, 2025 at 5:22 AM
Reposted
Also shopping mall parking lots and highway medians.
November 25, 2025 at 11:03 AM
Reposted
You know what else would create jobs? Installing solar on the roofs of homes where it's being used. And without all the habitat loss.
November 25, 2025 at 4:48 AM
Reposted
Insane! Oak savannas are the great north America eco system. They already only a pittance of their original size. Solar goes on brown sites
November 25, 2025 at 4:25 AM
Reposted
Someone paid for this, that someone will make big money on this destruction and since it is destruction, you can bet its Republican backed
November 25, 2025 at 4:16 AM
Reposted
It makes zero sense. Completely counterproductive. Solar should never be built on greenfield sites. We need all the carbon absorption and biodiversity we have left.
November 25, 2025 at 3:57 AM
Reposted
I'm immediately suspicious that the pushback against this is driven by fossil fuel interests.
November 25, 2025 at 3:20 AM
Reposted
WTAF?!?! No. Pit solar panels over parking lots. Do not cut down trees for freaking solar panels
November 25, 2025 at 3:04 AM
Reposted
I love my solar panels on my roof and was raised by a hard core environmentalist but I would never support this! Trees matter!!
November 25, 2025 at 2:50 AM
Reposted
Why cut down trees for solar. There is so much freaking grassland in california!!! What the heck!!!
November 25, 2025 at 2:35 AM
Reposted
Exactly. This is part of the reason why it's dumb. This state should be able to totally integrate the power sources & there should not be competing companies.
Build out solar where literally no one will ever live and fuel the entire state.
November 25, 2025 at 4:03 AM
Reposted
Trees in N. Cal are dying from an onslaught of diseases, insects and drought. Every tree should be considered essential to the health of the dwindling environment of Northern Cal. Someone must advocate for the trees.
November 25, 2025 at 2:32 AM
Reposted
Why can’t they put solar farms along railway lines or freeways or on every rooftop in California. There are thousands of square miles of you look at all the different rooftops. Commercial, residential etc…
November 25, 2025 at 1:58 AM
Reposted
This is infuriating. Vernal pools, oaks. ugh!
Can an environmental group file suit to stop this madnessm
November 25, 2025 at 1:38 AM
Reposted
I understand. I'm frustrated w/ noticing that our Kremlin Media has us saying, "Biden" but "PRESIDENT tRump." #JustDonald is a pig.
November 25, 2025 at 4:15 PM
Reposted
It’s on a plaque at West Point ffs. Of course their duty is to always act lawfully. How could it be otherwise?
November 25, 2025 at 3:39 PM
Reposted
ucmj.us/888-article-...
He's acting as a Senator, not an officer. He didn't express contempt. He gave a safety brief every veteran has heard dozens of times. He can't be charged or prosecuted in any way for his Speech as a Senator or Representative.
888. ARTICLE 88. Contempt toward Officials
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportat...
ucmj.us
November 25, 2025 at 3:27 PM
Reposted
#GrumpyPolitics Telling troops that they must not follow unlawful orders is not sedition. It is not undermining the President.

Unless the President is giving unlawful orders and knows it. In which case, he might throw a tantrum.
November 25, 2025 at 1:31 PM
Reposted
A federal judge invalidated the indictment because U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan was improperly appointed.
Case Against James Comey Dismissed As Judge Invalidates Trump Prosecutor’s Appointment
A federal judge invalidated the indictment because U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan was improperly appointed.
www.forbes.com
November 24, 2025 at 5:50 PM