Universeness
skelly131.bsky.social
Universeness
@skelly131.bsky.social
9 followers 14 following 460 posts
Scottish, Retired, Computer Science teacher.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
I was glad @heavensgone.bsky.social,
That you ‘liked’ the first two response sections I made to your op and you did not ‘like’ the 3rd. Can I assume that this means that you don’t find my opinions on land ownership, ‘out there’ or ‘fringe?’
What is the policy of the Greens on land ownership?
authority would of course, enforce the stewardship of ‘national,’ land but all land should not even be ‘owned’ by any notion of sovereign or national government. I realise my opinion here is ‘out there’ and ‘very fringe,’ but I DO really think that this is the progressive way we humans should go!
commercial building on that land etc, then sure, no one else should be able to ‘trespass’ or utilise that area or a ‘sensible’ surrounding area, without your consent. BUT the land that property occupies, must remain in common ownership/stewardship of all life that exists on this planet imo. Local
There should be no private individuals who are ‘large land owners,’ in Scotland.
The idea that individual humans can OWN land has never made sense to me.
I understand that if you currently occupy land because you have been assigned a house on that land or you own a building or farm or industrial or
Yep, justice does not apply to nefarious rich people.
From East end of Glesga characters, who did well in the game of capitalist money tricks via women's underwear, all the way up to a paedo Prince of the UK or a paedo, rapist, criminal, jaffa skinned freak, elected president of the USA, TWICE!
against them has been slow, but significant. WE CAN WIN!
BUT, the one issue on the horizon that could prove to be the decider in this struggle is who gains control of AI. That tech is certainly currently in the hands of the nefarious rich. I don’t know how that will go for the masses!!!!!!
Capitalist ‘money tricks’ have been employed ever since we emerged from the wilds. ‘The masses,’ have made very good progress against these scumbags, at a great cost in lives, over the centuries but due to other weaponry that the nefarious rich have at their disposal, like theism etc. Progress
‘You can fool some of the people some of the time,’ was the only truth the nefarious amongst us needed, to create and maintain the global rule of a tiny (in number but not in power) group of malignant rich. They have proved that this is true and has always been successful and better and better
with negative rich peoples obfuscations like ‘class envy’ or ‘the resentment of poor people.’ It’s about justice and the right to equal status and treatment under the law, regardless of access to one of the most malignant inventions the human race spewed up, since we came out of the wilds ….. money!
… represents. You cannot compare the options a child has that is born into privilege with the majority of children who are not. It is unacceptable that the only difference between them is access to money. The right to free, high quality housing from cradle to grave for all people is fck all to do
I reject categorising people based on money/economics (the vile class system.) The term ‘class envy,’ is indeed a misnomer and ‘resentment,’ is just as bad, in this context. This is about moral birthright, secular humanism and a political system that prioritises the well-being of those it …
Forrest Valikai was on with Erika Gutsick Gibbon for an 11h+ session. A caller, Rob (he/him) UK, phoned in. A transphobic prick, who matched the mindset and came out with the same BS arguments as the science-denying transphobic dripshits who have posted on this thread:
youtu.be/_2w32FGVDt4?...
SCIENTISTS vs. Theists!! ALL DAY! Call Forrest Valkai & Erika Gutsick Gibbon | Cus' I Wanna 10.25.25
YouTube video by The Line
youtu.be
The answer is simple! Theism is one of the most successful grifts foisted on the human race since we emerged from the wilds. Is it not about time we all united to nullify all negative effects of all religious grifting?
When it come to Monarchy. I more and more align with the viewpoint of Oliver Cromwell. I wouldn’t chop their heads off but I certainly would chop their titles off, and I would chop off every penny of state funding they receive, permanently!
Imo, we continue to pussyfoot around the edges whilst the nefarious rich, continue to exist and leech from all of us.
Decent housing should be a birthright for every human being and should have fck all to do with such an insipid human invention as money.
happen, demonstrate to me that there are no fukkin gods.
So, much so, that I created an oil painting called 'Natural responders.' Where some 'natural assets,' have joined forces to terrify and destroy Trump. It was fun to paint: 😁
See, if a god existed, such a storm would gather directly over Trumps head, and follow him wherever he went. As his corrupted mindset became more and more repugnant, the storm would get more and more powerful and attack him, anytime it could access him. The fact that such 'natural responses' never
That result in Caerphilly must have the Labour party stalwarts in a real tizzy. Wtf did they expect, people kicked out the tories because they were utterly repugnant and they wanted change (at last!!) and what did Starmer offer? Nothing but more shades of tory shit!
🤣😂Are you fukkin serious Quack boy?
In-between posting your sooooooo dimwitted questions on this thread, do you have serious memory recall issues?
HUMANS! You numpty! Because sex is a spectrum. 😂That is what this thread has been all about you very silly babybonce!
would understand that sex is a spectrum, so I would create a sub-routine that could output whatever the LGBTQIA+ community, supported by modern biologists, list, as the set of values currently accepted within the range of the sex spectrum.
are also possible. BUT intersex people will have many traits from both sets of criteria, so the sub-routine would require a third possible outcome. This could be an output such as 'unknown' or 'null' or just a text message such as 'function was unable to determine sex' 😂
If I was the programmer, I
female is where the problems begin. Do you have to meet all criteria set (in which cased the 'and' operator would be needed in the conditions set) or just 'some' or 'most' of the criteria set values (in which case the 'or' operator would be used). Some combination of the 'and' and the 'or' operators
Well such a functional subroutine that returns a single output would be constructed using 'If-then-else' statements or a case statement etc and would based on 'true,' 'false' comparisons of the data input to the sub-routine. But the set of values that any input has to meet to be returned as male or
sex spectrum available. Sex as a strict binary was always TOO STRICT and scientifically inaccurate. We humans have always had our irrational members, who become scared Luddites or theists or primitives. But they almost never succeed in stopping our progress as a species.