The only way this would qualify as a Terry stop is if the guy was named Terry

It's the Epstein Ballroom. It's always been the Epstein Ballroom.

"THE Sorbonne"

Here's the order that was entered a short while ago

Here's the Sunday night order

Here's the Sunday night order

Is there any sort of minute order on the D. Or. docket?

For those looking for the opinion: www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...

That's one way to quickly devalue US currency

So you're saying J. Barrett unnecessarily relied on history to make a point and then misrepresented that history in order to reach a desired outcome?

Can you imagine even sitting on, let alone eating on, such a horridly cracked piece of limestone. So deep, so nasty. Such savages. How uncouth.

Wait, how do I know this statement is authorized by you? How goddammit!

Skip Amazon and always go to Powell's (picked mine up yesterday) @powells.bsky.social

When do the Rule 23(f) hot takes start rolling out?

Call is resuming NOW

checking calendar........ Nope, not April 1

Only when he's on the job, which, of course, does not include "drink break" time. So yeah, 100% quit.

Congratulations! Will be interesting to see if the justices who most often purport to ground their reasoning in history use this work

The BK code exempts certain debts from discharge, including those where the underlying conduct was "willful and malicious." IF that standard is satisfied by the Freeman defamation case then the $148M would not be subject to Ch 11. And if that happens, then Rudy probably dismisses BK case altogether