But we are not allowed to know how much it paid, because “disclosure may affect the commercial interests of Moody's and S&P”.
But we are not allowed to know how much it paid, because “disclosure may affect the commercial interests of Moody's and S&P”.
But we are not allowed to know how much it paid, because “disclosure may affect the commercial interests of Moody's and S&P”.
But we are not allowed to know how much it paid, because “disclosure may affect the commercial interests of Moody's and S&P”.
No. Of course it hasn’t. The answer would be fatal to nationalist propaganda on energy, so better not to know.
No. Of course it hasn’t. The answer would be fatal to nationalist propaganda on energy, so better not to know.
No. Of course it hasn’t. The answer would be fatal to nationalist propaganda on energy, so better not to know.
No. Of course it hasn’t. The answer would be fatal to nationalist propaganda on energy, so better not to know.
Journalist registers (at last minute) for event. On arrival, there is no badge with her name on it. The organisers hurriedly make one up for her. It includes a small typo. A malevolent conspiracy, obviously.
Journalist registers (at last minute) for event. On arrival, there is no badge with her name on it. The organisers hurriedly make one up for her. It includes a small typo. A malevolent conspiracy, obviously.
Sort of, but we need to be clear that the high cost of gas is, in part, a policy choice driven by carbon pricing and lower-capacity factors.
My latest attempt to inject some nuance into the energy debate.
www.samdumitriu.com/p/is-offshor...