Stuart Buck
@stuartbuck.bsky.social
3K followers 210 following 6.1K posts
Executive Director, Good Science Project
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
stuartbuck.bsky.social
Was your third word drift?
Reposted by Stuart Buck
catharsistheater.bsky.social
(1/5)
Once, eccentric patrons funded wild dreams — radar in a mansion, secret codes in Shakespeare, scrolls from Vesuvius. Today, philanthropy feels safe and bureaucratic. What if wild giving could revive science, health and imagination?
🔗 www.palladiummag.com/2025/08/22/t...
@stuartbuck.bsky.social
The Case for Crazy Philanthropy
www.palladiummag.com
stuartbuck.bsky.social
Lucky:

Wordle 1,469 2/6

⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
stuartbuck.bsky.social
Anyway, thanks for continuing to raise important issues!
stuartbuck.bsky.social
I would never block you or Joe Bak-Coleman, because I am fine with (and even appreciate) being challenged. For me, blocking is only for people who are very disruptive or insulting. Not just because someone politely disagreed.
stuartbuck.bsky.social
I basically agree, I guess, but I also think it's poor epistemics to block someone when the apparent reason is "they made an argument that I find inconvenient to answer." I hadn't said anything remotely disrespectful to him at that point.

PS: you're definitely debating (disagreeing) with me! :)
stuartbuck.bsky.social
you're debating right now! :)

anyway, the only bad faith I see is the refusal to address an obvious counterpoint: are all people who work on a problem (reproducibility, anti-Semitism) to blame when a malignant politician weaponizes that issue? if not, why not?
stuartbuck.bsky.social
Carl Bergstrom blocked me for this post! Didn't know he was like that.
stuartbuck.bsky.social
Good point. In fact, one might as well denounce anyone who has ever criticized anti-Semitism because they are somehow responsible for Trump weaponizing that idea against Columbia and Harvard.
stuartbuck.bsky.social
*who's

Thanks for the plug, I guess!
stuartbuck.bsky.social
"so many"? I can think of arguably 2 people who might be what you're describing.
stuartbuck.bsky.social
Good point. In fact, one might as well denounce anyone who has ever criticized anti-Semitism because they are somehow responsible for Trump weaponizing that idea against Columbia and Harvard.
Reposted by Stuart Buck
issuesinst.bsky.social
Showing which proposals do AND don’t receive federal funding can improve research and advance open science, @stuartbuck.bsky.social & @csmarcum.sciences.social.ap.brid.gy write. In fact, US funding agencies are required by law to provide much of this data already:
Let Unfunded Grant Applications See the Light of Day
Showing which proposals do and don’t receive federal funding can improve research and advance open science.
issues.org
stuartbuck.bsky.social
And how does each red light have a different area in which other lights could occur? The size of stoplights isn't standard any more?
stuartbuck.bsky.social
How do these red lights make any sense? No source of support, no reason to exist in the first place, no reason to have multiple red lights.
stuartbuck.bsky.social
Nothing about that makes sense.
stuartbuck.bsky.social
But why are workers staying motionless the while time, and why are there red lights hanging in mid-air with no apparent support or reason for being there?
stuartbuck.bsky.social
* several stoplights hanging in mid-air for no reason
stuartbuck.bsky.social
Looks like an AI video.

* the people on the left don't move a muscle
* where exactly is a tree-lined railroad that is that close to the Washington Monument?
* tanks don't look real
stuartbuck.bsky.social
That video looks fake.
Reposted by Stuart Buck
sternbergh.bsky.social
must be incredibly frustrating and disheartening to have federal funding that was promised to you for important work suddenly and arbitrarily ripped away
bestofdyingtwit.bsky.social
“In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately”