Thelonious08
@thelonious08.bsky.social
🎶 G-O-T-T-O-G-O 🎶 #OrangeFascistGotToGo 🎶
Fight To Restore American Freedom and Democracy.
Destroy Fascism. Defend our Constitutional Rights. Save Our Republic.
Proud Supporter of https://citizensimpeachment.com/
Fight To Restore American Freedom and Democracy.
Destroy Fascism. Defend our Constitutional Rights. Save Our Republic.
Proud Supporter of https://citizensimpeachment.com/
Reposted by Thelonious08
Democrat Aftyn Behn is on the brink of winning a special election in Tennessee’s deep-red 7th congressional district—leading GOP Republicans and even President Trump into a frantic last-minute attack.
A victory here would continue an upward trend for Democrats on the local level. trib.al/FJCmYvj
A victory here would continue an upward trend for Democrats on the local level. trib.al/FJCmYvj
November 27, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Democrat Aftyn Behn is on the brink of winning a special election in Tennessee’s deep-red 7th congressional district—leading GOP Republicans and even President Trump into a frantic last-minute attack.
A victory here would continue an upward trend for Democrats on the local level. trib.al/FJCmYvj
A victory here would continue an upward trend for Democrats on the local level. trib.al/FJCmYvj
Reposted by Thelonious08
If someone is guilty it is the duty of those with the power to indict, to indict. Failure to indict is giving the criminal a free pass. It's also letting the corrupt bastard's accomplices go unnoticed.
Pelosi gained nothing by refusing to do her job and America lost a f*ck of a lot because of her.
Pelosi gained nothing by refusing to do her job and America lost a f*ck of a lot because of her.
December 19, 2024 at 2:32 PM
If someone is guilty it is the duty of those with the power to indict, to indict. Failure to indict is giving the criminal a free pass. It's also letting the corrupt bastard's accomplices go unnoticed.
Pelosi gained nothing by refusing to do her job and America lost a f*ck of a lot because of her.
Pelosi gained nothing by refusing to do her job and America lost a f*ck of a lot because of her.
Reposted by Thelonious08
We feel a (very recent) tidal shift in the way people are thinking about impeachment.
November 24, 2025 at 10:10 PM
We feel a (very recent) tidal shift in the way people are thinking about impeachment.
Reposted by Thelonious08
The only legal way to remove a tyrant is impeachment.
Taking that off the table means accepting totalitarian rule.
Taking that off the table means accepting totalitarian rule.
November 24, 2025 at 8:42 PM
The only legal way to remove a tyrant is impeachment.
Taking that off the table means accepting totalitarian rule.
Taking that off the table means accepting totalitarian rule.
Reposted by Thelonious08
Please say hello to Bri Woodson, running for Congress in GA-12.
Georgia: let her fight for you
briwoodsonforcongress.com
Georgia: let her fight for you
briwoodsonforcongress.com
November 24, 2025 at 8:53 PM
Please say hello to Bri Woodson, running for Congress in GA-12.
Georgia: let her fight for you
briwoodsonforcongress.com
Georgia: let her fight for you
briwoodsonforcongress.com
Reposted by Thelonious08
Nobody knows the future
but I'm 100% sure that refusing to play means you lose the game by forfeit
Why should Hakeem Jeffries intentionally lose every fucking game?
and how do the American people benefit from that?
but I'm 100% sure that refusing to play means you lose the game by forfeit
Why should Hakeem Jeffries intentionally lose every fucking game?
and how do the American people benefit from that?
November 27, 2025 at 6:44 AM
Nobody knows the future
but I'm 100% sure that refusing to play means you lose the game by forfeit
Why should Hakeem Jeffries intentionally lose every fucking game?
and how do the American people benefit from that?
but I'm 100% sure that refusing to play means you lose the game by forfeit
Why should Hakeem Jeffries intentionally lose every fucking game?
and how do the American people benefit from that?
Reposted by Thelonious08
Impeachment is the start of accountability.
It's the bare minimum required by the Constitution.
It's the bare minimum required by the Constitution.
November 24, 2025 at 6:49 PM
Impeachment is the start of accountability.
It's the bare minimum required by the Constitution.
It's the bare minimum required by the Constitution.
Reposted by Thelonious08
From our family to yours, happy Thanksgiving!
November 27, 2025 at 3:35 PM
From our family to yours, happy Thanksgiving!
Reposted by Thelonious08
We are so grateful for the volunteers who make Citizens' Impeachment happen. The hours of research, writing, graphic design, coordination, collaboration, and organizing you give is humbling to us!
Most of all, our gratitude today extends to all of you who are not willing to tolerate tyranny.
Most of all, our gratitude today extends to all of you who are not willing to tolerate tyranny.
November 27, 2025 at 2:37 PM
We are so grateful for the volunteers who make Citizens' Impeachment happen. The hours of research, writing, graphic design, coordination, collaboration, and organizing you give is humbling to us!
Most of all, our gratitude today extends to all of you who are not willing to tolerate tyranny.
Most of all, our gratitude today extends to all of you who are not willing to tolerate tyranny.
Reposted by Thelonious08
Impeach him again for this.
Really looks like the United States is about to launch a regime change war against Venezuela with:
-No casus belli
-No authorization from Congress
-No allies or international support
-No plan for a post-Maduro Venezuela
-No preparation for any sort of stabilization or containment of the fallout
-No casus belli
-No authorization from Congress
-No allies or international support
-No plan for a post-Maduro Venezuela
-No preparation for any sort of stabilization or containment of the fallout
November 24, 2025 at 5:26 PM
Impeach him again for this.
Reposted by Thelonious08
You're contradicting yourself. You said those impeachments were counterproductive.
Remind me again,
How did the American people benefit from Nancy completely ignoring 99% of the crime and corruption?
Remind me again,
How did the American people benefit from Nancy completely ignoring 99% of the crime and corruption?
November 27, 2025 at 6:46 AM
You're contradicting yourself. You said those impeachments were counterproductive.
Remind me again,
How did the American people benefit from Nancy completely ignoring 99% of the crime and corruption?
Remind me again,
How did the American people benefit from Nancy completely ignoring 99% of the crime and corruption?
Elliott's most glaring error is not realizing that every time Orange Pig breaks the law in broad daylight and Congressional leaders don't demand immediate impeachment it IS EXONERATION.
rejecting impeachment = endorsing his crime wave
rejecting impeachment = endorsing his crime wave
This is you telling me that Jeffries never should have impeached him at all, because it only made the fascist stronger.
It's really hard to take you seriously when you don't even agree with yourself.
It's really hard to take you seriously when you don't even agree with yourself.
November 27, 2025 at 12:17 PM
Elliott's most glaring error is not realizing that every time Orange Pig breaks the law in broad daylight and Congressional leaders don't demand immediate impeachment it IS EXONERATION.
rejecting impeachment = endorsing his crime wave
rejecting impeachment = endorsing his crime wave
Reposted by Thelonious08
Hakeem Jeffries swore an oath to defend the Constitution
Orange man violates that Constitution daily
Someone is a total fucking piece of shit here and it's not the Mayor-Elect.
Orange man violates that Constitution daily
Someone is a total fucking piece of shit here and it's not the Mayor-Elect.
November 27, 2025 at 6:43 AM
Hakeem Jeffries swore an oath to defend the Constitution
Orange man violates that Constitution daily
Someone is a total fucking piece of shit here and it's not the Mayor-Elect.
Orange man violates that Constitution daily
Someone is a total fucking piece of shit here and it's not the Mayor-Elect.
Reposted by Thelonious08
it's funny that you think you know the future
you are not clairvoyant
refusing to act 100% guarantees failure
it is the worst of all possible options
you are not clairvoyant
refusing to act 100% guarantees failure
it is the worst of all possible options
I can see you like to make bold statements without a clue what you're talking about. Never once did I say that he shouldn't have been impeached. However, the statement has been made. The House sent articles of impeachment to the Senate.
You will not get 67 senators to vote for conviction!
You will not get 67 senators to vote for conviction!
November 26, 2025 at 7:26 PM
it's funny that you think you know the future
you are not clairvoyant
refusing to act 100% guarantees failure
it is the worst of all possible options
you are not clairvoyant
refusing to act 100% guarantees failure
it is the worst of all possible options
Reposted by Thelonious08
Courage Candidate @marialanakinter.bsky.social is running for Congress in FL-07.
She is one of our fearless candidates who is not afraid of this criminal tyrant and will work on day one to impeach him.
Give her a follow!
She is one of our fearless candidates who is not afraid of this criminal tyrant and will work on day one to impeach him.
Give her a follow!
November 24, 2025 at 12:49 PM
Courage Candidate @marialanakinter.bsky.social is running for Congress in FL-07.
She is one of our fearless candidates who is not afraid of this criminal tyrant and will work on day one to impeach him.
Give her a follow!
She is one of our fearless candidates who is not afraid of this criminal tyrant and will work on day one to impeach him.
Give her a follow!
Reposted by Thelonious08
We see a lot of posts about how impeachment won’t happen and that we should push for the 25th Amendment instead.
Why won’t that work?
The 25th requires Trump’s own cabinet to act, which is unlikely. Impeachment only requires a simple majority in the House. It is faster and more direct.
Why won’t that work?
The 25th requires Trump’s own cabinet to act, which is unlikely. Impeachment only requires a simple majority in the House. It is faster and more direct.
November 25, 2025 at 4:46 AM
We see a lot of posts about how impeachment won’t happen and that we should push for the 25th Amendment instead.
Why won’t that work?
The 25th requires Trump’s own cabinet to act, which is unlikely. Impeachment only requires a simple majority in the House. It is faster and more direct.
Why won’t that work?
The 25th requires Trump’s own cabinet to act, which is unlikely. Impeachment only requires a simple majority in the House. It is faster and more direct.
Reposted by Thelonious08
*Any member can force a vote via Rule IX. citizensimpeachment.com/rule-ix-and-...
*If no one impeaches him, people believe he has not done impeachable things. (Obvs not true, but not everyone pays attention like we do!)
*If nothing else, it shows who's complicit in his treason. Make them own it.
*If no one impeaches him, people believe he has not done impeachable things. (Obvs not true, but not everyone pays attention like we do!)
*If nothing else, it shows who's complicit in his treason. Make them own it.
What is Rule IX? - Citizens' Impeachment
Rule IX of the House of Representatives allows any member to force a vote on impeachment, without the approval of House leadership.
citizensimpeachment.com
November 25, 2025 at 7:54 PM
*Any member can force a vote via Rule IX. citizensimpeachment.com/rule-ix-and-...
*If no one impeaches him, people believe he has not done impeachable things. (Obvs not true, but not everyone pays attention like we do!)
*If nothing else, it shows who's complicit in his treason. Make them own it.
*If no one impeaches him, people believe he has not done impeachable things. (Obvs not true, but not everyone pays attention like we do!)
*If nothing else, it shows who's complicit in his treason. Make them own it.
Reposted by Thelonious08
More corruption.
A real Congress would write Articles every day.
A real Congress would write Articles every day.
Now here’s the kind of news you drop going into a long holiday weekend. Maybe no one will notice. 🤡
@nytimes.com
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/26/u...
@nytimes.com
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/26/u...
November 26, 2025 at 12:40 PM
More corruption.
A real Congress would write Articles every day.
A real Congress would write Articles every day.
Let's hear your plan.
What resources do you want to use? How will you use them to remove the fascists and restore American Freedom and Democracy?
I'm all ears.
What resources do you want to use? How will you use them to remove the fascists and restore American Freedom and Democracy?
I'm all ears.
Again, for the less intelligent out there... I never advocated doing nothing. I said that taking repeated futile action for action sake is not only worthless, but is incentivizes the MAGA base and demoralizes its foes.
You conflate "doing nothing" with "not wasting resourses ineffectively".
You conflate "doing nothing" with "not wasting resourses ineffectively".
November 27, 2025 at 8:50 AM
Let's hear your plan.
What resources do you want to use? How will you use them to remove the fascists and restore American Freedom and Democracy?
I'm all ears.
What resources do you want to use? How will you use them to remove the fascists and restore American Freedom and Democracy?
I'm all ears.
Reposted by Thelonious08
Oh, that's right. because he didn't.
It was Nancy Pelosi who fiercely refused to do her job thereby enabling an explosion of executive branch crime and corruption.
@elot247.bsky.social
It was Nancy Pelosi who fiercely refused to do her job thereby enabling an explosion of executive branch crime and corruption.
@elot247.bsky.social
The mayor-elect of New York City shit all over his Oath of office and his Constitutional Duty in order to give a deranged orange fascist a free pass on hundreds of impeachable offenses?
I must have missed that.
I must have missed that.
November 27, 2025 at 7:19 AM
Oh, that's right. because he didn't.
It was Nancy Pelosi who fiercely refused to do her job thereby enabling an explosion of executive branch crime and corruption.
@elot247.bsky.social
It was Nancy Pelosi who fiercely refused to do her job thereby enabling an explosion of executive branch crime and corruption.
@elot247.bsky.social
Orange man is destroying the White House because he's jealous of it.
The American People love and cherish that historic symbolic building far more than they care about a deranged pig destroying our Constitution.
So he must demolish his rival. His narcissism won't tolerate its existence.
The American People love and cherish that historic symbolic building far more than they care about a deranged pig destroying our Constitution.
So he must demolish his rival. His narcissism won't tolerate its existence.
November 27, 2025 at 7:12 AM
Orange man is destroying the White House because he's jealous of it.
The American People love and cherish that historic symbolic building far more than they care about a deranged pig destroying our Constitution.
So he must demolish his rival. His narcissism won't tolerate its existence.
The American People love and cherish that historic symbolic building far more than they care about a deranged pig destroying our Constitution.
So he must demolish his rival. His narcissism won't tolerate its existence.
If 2 impeachments was good then 4 would be twice as good, right?
November 27, 2025 at 6:45 AM
If 2 impeachments was good then 4 would be twice as good, right?
Your hypothetical was the 100+ impeachments that never happened.
November 27, 2025 at 5:48 AM
Your hypothetical was the 100+ impeachments that never happened.
99% of all Presidential corruption happened while or shortly before Nancy Pelosi was Speaker of the House, the body with the Constitutional Duty to impeach executive branch malfeasance.
and her response was "He's not worth impeaching"
and her response was "He's not worth impeaching"
November 27, 2025 at 5:46 AM
99% of all Presidential corruption happened while or shortly before Nancy Pelosi was Speaker of the House, the body with the Constitutional Duty to impeach executive branch malfeasance.
and her response was "He's not worth impeaching"
and her response was "He's not worth impeaching"