chung van gog
banner
umbralcuboids.com
chung van gog
@umbralcuboids.com
81 followers 300 following 4.4K posts
bluesky is my private diary. on a journey to gain courage and align heart mind body and soul. he/him. 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🏳️‍🌈 🗝️🕊️ 🦢 🤍
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Updated version: I post about my life experience, nerdy math and physics things, amateur philosophy takes, books I'm reading, politics, good music, occasional blog posts, games & game variants, and whatever else catches my fancy
i post about my life experience, abstract or concrete, about poker variants & theoretical analysis, amateur philosophy takes, good music, and occasional blog posts <3
highlight reel. why do i keep spelling things phonetically:S
it’s not an instagram highlight real with all that shit. But it’s a highlight real of 10/10 moments with beautiful people music food ideas activities and all that
I am happy. There are just so many incredible and beautiful moments….
I am happy. There are just so many incredible and beautiful moments….
I have decided I will be absolutely shameless in learning whatever the hell catches my fancy
I am feeling annoyed.
Or, if understood as part of histsci, in the sphere that includes Max Planck.
“planck length” and “planck time” themselves have sphere [[0]], because they can be found within the sphere of radius 2^0 = 1 planck length/time
In my dream world, the “present” monent for an observer is used as epochal. And the spheres derive from that.
I think I like “center of Earth, 06:00 a.m. 2100 CE” as an epochal light cone. I will likely not really care about much after that point. I won’t need to adjust it anytime soon.
(Obvs not saying they’re real.)

Cinema should also belong in a similar sphere of r = 150 years.

Maybe I should use powers of 2? I like 2 better. It’s much more fundamental then 10.
On the other hand, “alien kidnappings” belong in a sphere of maybe r = 100 years
Eg, the “zebra” is filed under the sphere that has a radius of at least 2 million years, since that’s when zebras first evolved.
I will need to define my spheres at some moment.

Basically, defining a “nice” epochal light cone and then defining orders of magnitudes of numbers of planck lengths and planck times of distance wrt that epoch, giving them “nice” names, and then using this to structure any and all topics.
You will now have comprehended more than each of these two brilliant minds has on their own. Unless one is aware of the other - but then you just haven’t read broadly enough.
Here is a secret.

Read one brilliant book by a brilliant author. Then another completely different brilliant book by a completely different but equally brilliant author.
Much more concise than lectures would be pointers. But then the context would be lacking, and they would come without my thoughts.
to even properly communicate the scope of my generalist vantage point would require 120+ lectures
hey! i’m a generalist, not a specialist. and that’s fully ok. generalism is great :)
Also in every single domain there are people with vastly superior knowledge. Not to mention that there are generalists whose scope dwarfs mine.
I could easily imagine preparing a dozen lectures on cinema. And finding a dozen other domains in which I have explored more.
There are critics I care about. I know of obscure movie discussion groups that have a depth that gives you vertigo and that allows you to easily spend 10,000 hours on cinema. There’d are intersections between cinema and 20th c. philosophy.
I’m not joking. For example: take cinema. There are hundreds of movies that have been influential for me.
to even properly communicate the scope of my generalist vantage point would require 120+ lectures
hey! i’m a generalist, not a specialist. and that’s fully ok. generalism is great :)
cf. the specialist who’d require the informational equivalent of 120 lectures to properly communicate certain specialist views
to even properly communicate the scope of my generalist vantage point would require 120+ lectures
hey! i’m a generalist, not a specialist. and that’s fully ok. generalism is great :)
JPEGMafia is a genius
hey! i’m a generalist, not a specialist. and that’s fully ok. generalism is great :)