@123xyz.bsky.social
Sorry. I read someone saying she wasn't & didn't check.
December 14, 2025 at 7:25 AM
Sorry. I read someone saying she wasn't & didn't check.
Fair?!
What has Korea done to deserve such abuse?
What has Korea done to deserve such abuse?
December 12, 2025 at 7:32 AM
Fair?!
What has Korea done to deserve such abuse?
What has Korea done to deserve such abuse?
I believe she wasn't under oath.
December 12, 2025 at 7:30 AM
I believe she wasn't under oath.
For pure evil, I don't think any of the others you list comes close to Steven Miller who is an actual white supremacist neo-Nazi who would happily shove us into ovens. But, if you focus on how many people they kill, Kennedy wins.
December 12, 2025 at 7:29 AM
For pure evil, I don't think any of the others you list comes close to Steven Miller who is an actual white supremacist neo-Nazi who would happily shove us into ovens. But, if you focus on how many people they kill, Kennedy wins.
Just to be clear, $65,000 is not a huge net wealth & wealth is unfairly distributed, but it's stupid to pretend the net wealth of the least wealthy 50% of households is 50x smaller than it really is ($84B instead of $4.2T).
The one having problems with math is whoever divided the real number by 50.
The one having problems with math is whoever divided the real number by 50.
December 12, 2025 at 7:18 AM
Just to be clear, $65,000 is not a huge net wealth & wealth is unfairly distributed, but it's stupid to pretend the net wealth of the least wealthy 50% of households is 50x smaller than it really is ($84B instead of $4.2T).
The one having problems with math is whoever divided the real number by 50.
The one having problems with math is whoever divided the real number by 50.
And YES dividing the # that's the total net wealth of the least wealthy 64M households by the # 64M DOES give the average wealth of those households. That some have negative net wealth doesn't change how averages are calculated: add up the positive & negative wealth of the households & divide by 64M
December 12, 2025 at 7:10 AM
And YES dividing the # that's the total net wealth of the least wealthy 64M households by the # 64M DOES give the average wealth of those households. That some have negative net wealth doesn't change how averages are calculated: add up the positive & negative wealth of the households & divide by 64M
Fuckwit, you're dead wrong. The bottom 50% is all the way up to the median and the total NET (that means after subtracting debt, you complete fucking idiot) wealth of the bottom 50% of wealth is $4.2T, not $84B (an average of ~$65k per household).
Have you still not clicked on the fucking link?
Have you still not clicked on the fucking link?
December 12, 2025 at 7:10 AM
Fuckwit, you're dead wrong. The bottom 50% is all the way up to the median and the total NET (that means after subtracting debt, you complete fucking idiot) wealth of the bottom 50% of wealth is $4.2T, not $84B (an average of ~$65k per household).
Have you still not clicked on the fucking link?
Have you still not clicked on the fucking link?
In your last sentence, you misspelled the word "is."
December 12, 2025 at 6:57 AM
In your last sentence, you misspelled the word "is."
You'd need a lot more to prosecute her for perjury. She said "we don't deport US citizens or veterans." That's not true, but you'd need to follow-up questions like "what about veterans who aren't citizens," get her to double down on the falsehood, & get some evidence she knew it was false.
December 12, 2025 at 6:56 AM
You'd need a lot more to prosecute her for perjury. She said "we don't deport US citizens or veterans." That's not true, but you'd need to follow-up questions like "what about veterans who aren't citizens," get her to double down on the falsehood, & get some evidence she knew it was false.
*If the combined net worth of the bottom 64M households was only $84B,....
Sorry about my editing error.
Sorry about my editing error.
December 11, 2025 at 6:41 AM
*If the combined net worth of the bottom 64M households was only $84B,....
Sorry about my editing error.
Sorry about my editing error.
Why the fuck would you trust a chart you found on the internet with no indication of the source of the data & no link to that data over a link to data from the Federal Reserve?
And why argue with me without thinking whether it's possible the bottom 50% of household wealth averages $1300? It isn't.
And why argue with me without thinking whether it's possible the bottom 50% of household wealth averages $1300? It isn't.
December 11, 2025 at 6:37 AM
Why the fuck would you trust a chart you found on the internet with no indication of the source of the data & no link to that data over a link to data from the Federal Reserve?
And why argue with me without thinking whether it's possible the bottom 50% of household wealth averages $1300? It isn't.
And why argue with me without thinking whether it's possible the bottom 50% of household wealth averages $1300? It isn't.
I'm talking about the difference between lies & facts. Did you look at the data I linked for you showing the net worth of the bottom 50% is $4.2T? Click on the fucking link!
How can you possibly believe that the bottom 64M households have a net worth of $84B (~$1300 each)?
How can you possibly believe that the bottom 64M households have a net worth of $84B (~$1300 each)?
Net Worth Held by the Bottom 50% (1st to 50th Wealth Percentiles)
Net Worth Held by the Bottom 50% (1st to 50th Wealth Percentiles)
fred.stlouisfed.org
December 11, 2025 at 6:37 AM
I'm talking about the difference between lies & facts. Did you look at the data I linked for you showing the net worth of the bottom 50% is $4.2T? Click on the fucking link!
How can you possibly believe that the bottom 64M households have a net worth of $84B (~$1300 each)?
How can you possibly believe that the bottom 64M households have a net worth of $84B (~$1300 each)?
It's nice that those in attendance were moved by his testimony, but why were so few in the room?
December 11, 2025 at 5:59 AM
It's nice that those in attendance were moved by his testimony, but why were so few in the room?
No. Every single person who voted for him is an irresponsible raging asshole too. That's tens of millions of Asshole-Americans.
December 11, 2025 at 5:52 AM
No. Every single person who voted for him is an irresponsible raging asshole too. That's tens of millions of Asshole-Americans.
😂
I'm proud of the help my fat thumbs provided to the pushbike catastrophe.
I'm proud of the help my fat thumbs provided to the pushbike catastrophe.
December 11, 2025 at 2:42 AM
😂
I'm proud of the help my fat thumbs provided to the pushbike catastrophe.
I'm proud of the help my fat thumbs provided to the pushbike catastrophe.
I honestly forget what false claim I was responding to and I blocked the person who posted the lie, but my recollection was that the entire substance of the post was false. Google it.
December 11, 2025 at 2:39 AM
I honestly forget what false claim I was responding to and I blocked the person who posted the lie, but my recollection was that the entire substance of the post was false. Google it.
When that works on an AI, it proves some AIs are shitty, not that what we do is unique and can't be replicated by machines.
December 11, 2025 at 2:36 AM
When that works on an AI, it proves some AIs are shitty, not that what we do is unique and can't be replicated by machines.
*pushbike
Genuine typo.
Genuine typo.
December 11, 2025 at 2:34 AM
*pushbike
Genuine typo.
Genuine typo.
Nah. How about we just randomly select 1% of billionaires every year to get the chop. That'd be 8 American billionaires in the first year, but I suspect the number would go down fast as they shifted their assets to charitable foundations.
December 11, 2025 at 2:32 AM
Nah. How about we just randomly select 1% of billionaires every year to get the chop. That'd be 8 American billionaires in the first year, but I suspect the number would go down fast as they shifted their assets to charitable foundations.
Crypto bro blocked.
December 11, 2025 at 2:25 AM
Crypto bro blocked.
The gap is still shocking, but you undermine your own cause by spreading false numbers.
December 11, 2025 at 2:23 AM
The gap is still shocking, but you undermine your own cause by spreading false numbers.
Shame on all of you for your lack of critical thinking in believing the bottom 50% of households (64M households) have a net worth of only $84B, an average of ~$1,300 each.
The real number is $4.2T & it takes most of the US's 800+ billionaires to have more wealth than the poorest ~64M households.
The real number is $4.2T & it takes most of the US's 800+ billionaires to have more wealth than the poorest ~64M households.
America's 806 billionaires are now richer than half the population combined—a lot richer
They have 57 percent more wealth, all told, than 65 million US households.
www.motherjones.com
December 11, 2025 at 2:23 AM
Shame on all of you for your lack of critical thinking in believing the bottom 50% of households (64M households) have a net worth of only $84B, an average of ~$1,300 each.
The real number is $4.2T & it takes most of the US's 800+ billionaires to have more wealth than the poorest ~64M households.
The real number is $4.2T & it takes most of the US's 800+ billionaires to have more wealth than the poorest ~64M households.
Don't spread lies. With ~129M households in the US, if the combined wealth of the poorest 50% (~64.3M families) had a combined net worth of $84B, their average net worth would be ~$1,300. The real average is ~$60K and the total is about $4.2T.
fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WFRBL...
fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WFRBL...
Net Worth Held by the Bottom 50% (1st to 50th Wealth Percentiles)
Net Worth Held by the Bottom 50% (1st to 50th Wealth Percentiles)
fred.stlouisfed.org
December 11, 2025 at 2:13 AM
Don't spread lies. With ~129M households in the US, if the combined wealth of the poorest 50% (~64.3M families) had a combined net worth of $84B, their average net worth would be ~$1,300. The real average is ~$60K and the total is about $4.2T.
fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WFRBL...
fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WFRBL...
The reality that our 800+ billionaires have significantly more wealth than the bottom 50% of households is bad enough. Spreading lies that exaggerate the vast disparity in wealth makes it easier for people to ignore the real numbers. (The link is 18 mos. old.)
www.motherjones.com/politics/202...
www.motherjones.com/politics/202...
America's 806 billionaires are now richer than half the population combined—a lot richer
They have 57 percent more wealth, all told, than 65 million US households.
www.motherjones.com
December 11, 2025 at 2:08 AM
The reality that our 800+ billionaires have significantly more wealth than the bottom 50% of households is bad enough. Spreading lies that exaggerate the vast disparity in wealth makes it easier for people to ignore the real numbers. (The link is 18 mos. old.)
www.motherjones.com/politics/202...
www.motherjones.com/politics/202...