Elizabeth S
@1ewsmith.bsky.social
I share memes and occasional videos of cute animals, interspersed with things I am ticked off or passionate about. I don’t provide legal or any other expert advice on social media.
1000%. They’re like a multilevel middleman with Rx benefits managers they insert into decisions for what drugs patients can/can’t have, claims reviewers who grant/deny pre-authorizations even if you have a MD’s note, ridiculous billing codes and forced time limits for MD time with patients
December 11, 2025 at 1:21 AM
1000%. They’re like a multilevel middleman with Rx benefits managers they insert into decisions for what drugs patients can/can’t have, claims reviewers who grant/deny pre-authorizations even if you have a MD’s note, ridiculous billing codes and forced time limits for MD time with patients
Errr, what? We want to scare people into not getting healthcare or encourage them to shop around for cheaper alternatives to gall bladder surgery? What does this even mean?
December 11, 2025 at 1:13 AM
Errr, what? We want to scare people into not getting healthcare or encourage them to shop around for cheaper alternatives to gall bladder surgery? What does this even mean?
You can’t use “female” or “women” but you can use “men” unless it is followed by “who have sex with other men.” “Black” is not okay if capitalized? “Race” is also banned.
December 11, 2025 at 1:03 AM
You can’t use “female” or “women” but you can use “men” unless it is followed by “who have sex with other men.” “Black” is not okay if capitalized? “Race” is also banned.
They only change if they want to. Like addicts. Maybe their drug is the racism, misogyny, general bigotry against anyone who isn’t white/“Christian”/male, cruelty, tax breaks, guns, ignorance, alternative facts, or whatever else that looks like bombastic stupidity to us.
They’re unreachable.
They’re unreachable.
December 10, 2025 at 3:34 PM
They only change if they want to. Like addicts. Maybe their drug is the racism, misogyny, general bigotry against anyone who isn’t white/“Christian”/male, cruelty, tax breaks, guns, ignorance, alternative facts, or whatever else that looks like bombastic stupidity to us.
They’re unreachable.
They’re unreachable.
Wow. Morris’s mistake was using ChatGPT to fact-check when it has a knowledge cutoff that is probably in 2023 & definitely before last year’s election. In the “before trump 2.0” timeline, ChatGPT’s conclusions would seem quite logical. Sadly, too many left logic behind at the polls.
December 10, 2025 at 7:57 AM
Wow. Morris’s mistake was using ChatGPT to fact-check when it has a knowledge cutoff that is probably in 2023 & definitely before last year’s election. In the “before trump 2.0” timeline, ChatGPT’s conclusions would seem quite logical. Sadly, too many left logic behind at the polls.
That frog is my Prince Charming if there are murder hornets nearby.
December 10, 2025 at 5:29 AM
That frog is my Prince Charming if there are murder hornets nearby.
Cringeworthy AI garbage showing people beat down in potentially dangerous situations, again and again. Then suggesting McD is a refuge. What a wretched excuse for pretending to be creative, while also avoiding paying for acting talent and the people who support the work. Who probably eat at McD.
December 9, 2025 at 3:09 PM
Cringeworthy AI garbage showing people beat down in potentially dangerous situations, again and again. Then suggesting McD is a refuge. What a wretched excuse for pretending to be creative, while also avoiding paying for acting talent and the people who support the work. Who probably eat at McD.
Tech bros are vile men, high on the power of their wealth. It’s so weird that they talk about violence as a show of strength and masculinity - it’s like they’re living out their childhood bully fantasies. So gross.
December 7, 2025 at 6:17 AM
Tech bros are vile men, high on the power of their wealth. It’s so weird that they talk about violence as a show of strength and masculinity - it’s like they’re living out their childhood bully fantasies. So gross.
Is the NYT using AI to write headlines now and skipping human proofreading? Because that’s the kind of slop that no journalist would read and go “run it!”
December 6, 2025 at 3:49 PM
Is the NYT using AI to write headlines now and skipping human proofreading? Because that’s the kind of slop that no journalist would read and go “run it!”
Even odds they’ll have it again next year and award it to him. As long as he’s still alive. “Unprecedented 2x winner of a peace prize! [Convicted felon] continues to exceed all expectations [including ones that exist only in his mind]!”
December 6, 2025 at 2:22 AM
Even odds they’ll have it again next year and award it to him. As long as he’s still alive. “Unprecedented 2x winner of a peace prize! [Convicted felon] continues to exceed all expectations [including ones that exist only in his mind]!”
Prince William is also 6’3”
A picture is worth a thousand words.
A picture is worth a thousand words.
December 6, 2025 at 1:45 AM
Prince William is also 6’3”
A picture is worth a thousand words.
A picture is worth a thousand words.
Anyone who has spent time on the phone trying/waiting to speak to a human to fix a problem that their company’s chatbot can’t knows that it’s a waste of a good 5-20 minutes each time. Nobody wants AI for most of what AI companies are selling to the C suite who just sees more $$$$ for themselves.
November 30, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Anyone who has spent time on the phone trying/waiting to speak to a human to fix a problem that their company’s chatbot can’t knows that it’s a waste of a good 5-20 minutes each time. Nobody wants AI for most of what AI companies are selling to the C suite who just sees more $$$$ for themselves.