@3ogham.bsky.social
You realise the AI site you keep complaining about was detracting from their legitimacy? You don't have to keep undermining the AI while also undermining their methodology.
That's fine. Yeah the more I look now the less solid ground there does appear to be. It doesn't matter now anyway.
That's fine. Yeah the more I look now the less solid ground there does appear to be. It doesn't matter now anyway.
January 12, 2026 at 1:48 AM
You realise the AI site you keep complaining about was detracting from their legitimacy? You don't have to keep undermining the AI while also undermining their methodology.
That's fine. Yeah the more I look now the less solid ground there does appear to be. It doesn't matter now anyway.
That's fine. Yeah the more I look now the less solid ground there does appear to be. It doesn't matter now anyway.
Fine, look up
electiontruthalliance.org
And again I'm not saying I believe this is true, but I do believe it's a possibility. And given Trump's lifelong criminal behaviour, highly likely he would try something. Not that it even matters, it wouldn't change anything if true.
electiontruthalliance.org
And again I'm not saying I believe this is true, but I do believe it's a possibility. And given Trump's lifelong criminal behaviour, highly likely he would try something. Not that it even matters, it wouldn't change anything if true.
Election Truth Alliance - Election Truth Alliance
Where Data Meets Democracy.
electiontruthalliance.org
January 12, 2026 at 1:04 AM
Fine, look up
electiontruthalliance.org
And again I'm not saying I believe this is true, but I do believe it's a possibility. And given Trump's lifelong criminal behaviour, highly likely he would try something. Not that it even matters, it wouldn't change anything if true.
electiontruthalliance.org
And again I'm not saying I believe this is true, but I do believe it's a possibility. And given Trump's lifelong criminal behaviour, highly likely he would try something. Not that it even matters, it wouldn't change anything if true.
That's a fact checking website regarding the election truth alliance - they make claims about statistical analysis of the election showing statistical irregularities that could indicate tampering. I posted the link to the fact checker to give a more balanced look at ETA's claims.
January 12, 2026 at 12:52 AM
That's a fact checking website regarding the election truth alliance - they make claims about statistical analysis of the election showing statistical irregularities that could indicate tampering. I posted the link to the fact checker to give a more balanced look at ETA's claims.
It's hardly without a shred of evidence. Not conclusive evidence by a long stretch, but there sounds like there is enough to warrant further investigation. Certainly enough to entertain it's a possibility. I'm not saying it's true, I just wouldn't discount it.
factually.co/fact-checks/...
factually.co/fact-checks/...
factually.co
January 12, 2026 at 12:13 AM
It's hardly without a shred of evidence. Not conclusive evidence by a long stretch, but there sounds like there is enough to warrant further investigation. Certainly enough to entertain it's a possibility. I'm not saying it's true, I just wouldn't discount it.
factually.co/fact-checks/...
factually.co/fact-checks/...
Sure if it was just tit for tat, but all the cases against Biden were thrown out. This is still litigating.
And it's not about strategising some theoretical situation, it's about what actually happened. Just because Trump cried Wolf doesn't mean he can't now be guilty of the same.
And it's not about strategising some theoretical situation, it's about what actually happened. Just because Trump cried Wolf doesn't mean he can't now be guilty of the same.
January 11, 2026 at 10:49 PM
Sure if it was just tit for tat, but all the cases against Biden were thrown out. This is still litigating.
And it's not about strategising some theoretical situation, it's about what actually happened. Just because Trump cried Wolf doesn't mean he can't now be guilty of the same.
And it's not about strategising some theoretical situation, it's about what actually happened. Just because Trump cried Wolf doesn't mean he can't now be guilty of the same.
That's why it's currently being litigated. So it'd be very presumptuous to assume those cases are in error until they have been heard.
But thanks to AI our future will be full of conspiracies that we can't know the difference between reality and fact.
But thanks to AI our future will be full of conspiracies that we can't know the difference between reality and fact.
January 11, 2026 at 10:22 PM
That's why it's currently being litigated. So it'd be very presumptuous to assume those cases are in error until they have been heard.
But thanks to AI our future will be full of conspiracies that we can't know the difference between reality and fact.
But thanks to AI our future will be full of conspiracies that we can't know the difference between reality and fact.
You do know that reality is outside of 'he said she said' don't you? When a liar accuses everyone of their own crimes, that doesn't make them immune to prosecution for those crimes.
January 11, 2026 at 10:19 PM
You do know that reality is outside of 'he said she said' don't you? When a liar accuses everyone of their own crimes, that doesn't make them immune to prosecution for those crimes.
Not successfully stolen, attempted to.
You underestimated him before and innocent people are now being executed in the street. But I checked your bio and you claim to be a proud zionist, so you're obviously okay with innocent people being murdered. I hope you have the day you deserve.
You underestimated him before and innocent people are now being executed in the street. But I checked your bio and you claim to be a proud zionist, so you're obviously okay with innocent people being murdered. I hope you have the day you deserve.
January 11, 2026 at 10:17 PM
Not successfully stolen, attempted to.
You underestimated him before and innocent people are now being executed in the street. But I checked your bio and you claim to be a proud zionist, so you're obviously okay with innocent people being murdered. I hope you have the day you deserve.
You underestimated him before and innocent people are now being executed in the street. But I checked your bio and you claim to be a proud zionist, so you're obviously okay with innocent people being murdered. I hope you have the day you deserve.
I'm not saying it's something that should distract from running - even if it gets proven without a shadow of a doubt it's not like Trump will just say 'oopsie, ya got me, here you go Kamala.'
That election is done. I just think it's highly likely Trump had an unfair hand on the scales.
That election is done. I just think it's highly likely Trump had an unfair hand on the scales.
January 11, 2026 at 10:14 PM
I'm not saying it's something that should distract from running - even if it gets proven without a shadow of a doubt it's not like Trump will just say 'oopsie, ya got me, here you go Kamala.'
That election is done. I just think it's highly likely Trump had an unfair hand on the scales.
That election is done. I just think it's highly likely Trump had an unfair hand on the scales.
Again, I'm not making the claim that it happened. I'm saying its wild to just assume it didn't happen given it is more likely to have happened than not.
"there'll be traffic on your morning commute".
"you don't know that"
"there has been every other day"
"you have no evidence, that's just vibes".
"there'll be traffic on your morning commute".
"you don't know that"
"there has been every other day"
"you have no evidence, that's just vibes".
January 11, 2026 at 9:57 PM
Again, I'm not making the claim that it happened. I'm saying its wild to just assume it didn't happen given it is more likely to have happened than not.
"there'll be traffic on your morning commute".
"you don't know that"
"there has been every other day"
"you have no evidence, that's just vibes".
"there'll be traffic on your morning commute".
"you don't know that"
"there has been every other day"
"you have no evidence, that's just vibes".
That's a pretty blinkered view and a very convenient way to dismiss everything I said without engaging any of it, but you do you.
Enjoy your 'midterms'. I do hope you are the first nation in history to vote out a facist administration peacefully.
Enjoy your 'midterms'. I do hope you are the first nation in history to vote out a facist administration peacefully.
January 11, 2026 at 9:48 PM
That's a pretty blinkered view and a very convenient way to dismiss everything I said without engaging any of it, but you do you.
Enjoy your 'midterms'. I do hope you are the first nation in history to vote out a facist administration peacefully.
Enjoy your 'midterms'. I do hope you are the first nation in history to vote out a facist administration peacefully.
Again, I don't have any evidence or certainty, and the evidence currently being argued in court. But to think that a man who ignores all legal and constitutional limits wouldn't try every illegal avenue at his disposal (again) is wild.
January 11, 2026 at 9:17 PM
Again, I don't have any evidence or certainty, and the evidence currently being argued in court. But to think that a man who ignores all legal and constitutional limits wouldn't try every illegal avenue at his disposal (again) is wild.
Do you really think he would have abided by the legal rules of the election? If an attempt to cheat had been discovered and foiled I'd be more skeptical, but nothing - he appears to have ran a legal campaign. First time for everything I guess.
January 11, 2026 at 9:17 PM
Do you really think he would have abided by the legal rules of the election? If an attempt to cheat had been discovered and foiled I'd be more skeptical, but nothing - he appears to have ran a legal campaign. First time for everything I guess.
And take the current cases away for a moment and look at the larger picture - the last time Trump lost he pursued every illegal avenue possible, culminating in a violent insurrection. This time he had more on the line (guilty verdicts) and was far better prepared (day 1 exec orders & proj2025).
January 11, 2026 at 9:17 PM
And take the current cases away for a moment and look at the larger picture - the last time Trump lost he pursued every illegal avenue possible, culminating in a violent insurrection. This time he had more on the line (guilty verdicts) and was far better prepared (day 1 exec orders & proj2025).
No one said interference last year. It only gradually started coming up mid '25. There are ongoing cases right now that have presented very plausible information. I'm not saying it did happen (I can't), I just think it's wild to believe it definitely didn't happen.
January 11, 2026 at 9:16 PM
No one said interference last year. It only gradually started coming up mid '25. There are ongoing cases right now that have presented very plausible information. I'm not saying it did happen (I can't), I just think it's wild to believe it definitely didn't happen.
It's not even remotely the same thing, and it's pretty short sighted to think it's just a case of blindly pointing fingers. Trump & supporters called foul before the result was cold. Then filed many, many lawsuits, all of which fell flat as the only evidence was 'trust me bro'.
January 11, 2026 at 9:15 PM
It's not even remotely the same thing, and it's pretty short sighted to think it's just a case of blindly pointing fingers. Trump & supporters called foul before the result was cold. Then filed many, many lawsuits, all of which fell flat as the only evidence was 'trust me bro'.
I find it amazing that people don't think Trump cheated in the election.
January 11, 2026 at 12:22 PM
I find it amazing that people don't think Trump cheated in the election.
Does this mean they bank and rupture?
December 23, 2025 at 12:50 PM
Does this mean they bank and rupture?
That's their main distraction tactic. Install facism while calling their opponents fascist. Call for violence and cruelty and accuse their opponents of the same. Etc, etc.
September 18, 2025 at 6:14 PM
That's their main distraction tactic. Install facism while calling their opponents fascist. Call for violence and cruelty and accuse their opponents of the same. Etc, etc.
Sure - I agree with what you're saying, I think we're just defining a 'businessman' differently, but it's the same outcome essentially.
(Except not everyone is playing that game, only monsters who value their own profits over everyone else. And yes, I do know they have all the power.)
(Except not everyone is playing that game, only monsters who value their own profits over everyone else. And yes, I do know they have all the power.)
August 15, 2025 at 3:31 AM
Sure - I agree with what you're saying, I think we're just defining a 'businessman' differently, but it's the same outcome essentially.
(Except not everyone is playing that game, only monsters who value their own profits over everyone else. And yes, I do know they have all the power.)
(Except not everyone is playing that game, only monsters who value their own profits over everyone else. And yes, I do know they have all the power.)
While everything you're saying is true, your first comment was based on the perception that he's a good businessman - playing the grift of capitalism is the reality, but it still doesn't add weight to any truth of the idea that he's a good businessman. This is a question of image, not reality.
August 15, 2025 at 12:15 AM
While everything you're saying is true, your first comment was based on the perception that he's a good businessman - playing the grift of capitalism is the reality, but it still doesn't add weight to any truth of the idea that he's a good businessman. This is a question of image, not reality.
That's not actually running a business tho, that's 'playing capitalism' which has a nasty habit of destroying good businesses to extract profits. It just goes to show that he doesn't run businesses well, he games the system to put others in the shit so as to put himself ahead.
August 14, 2025 at 1:07 AM
That's not actually running a business tho, that's 'playing capitalism' which has a nasty habit of destroying good businesses to extract profits. It just goes to show that he doesn't run businesses well, he games the system to put others in the shit so as to put himself ahead.
Honestly that doesn't make it look better. He had so much debt that he needed to offload that it bankruoted a casino isn't that much better than he bankrupted a casino. It just shows how badly all his other businesses were doing that they could pull down such a highly profitable business.
August 13, 2025 at 12:58 PM
Honestly that doesn't make it look better. He had so much debt that he needed to offload that it bankruoted a casino isn't that much better than he bankrupted a casino. It just shows how badly all his other businesses were doing that they could pull down such a highly profitable business.
The nazis didn't have nukes 😬😨
August 11, 2025 at 7:28 PM
The nazis didn't have nukes 😬😨
I haven't watched SouthPark in years, and my sense of humour has evolved sine then, but I didn't find any genuine comedy in these episodes other than "that sounds accurate" and "they actually had the courage to tell it like it is!" Documentary is right.
August 8, 2025 at 10:34 PM
I haven't watched SouthPark in years, and my sense of humour has evolved sine then, but I didn't find any genuine comedy in these episodes other than "that sounds accurate" and "they actually had the courage to tell it like it is!" Documentary is right.