Aaron Greenspan
@aarongreenspan.com
"Fueled by a litany of largely unintelligible and random grievances"
—Elon Musk's Lawyers
"Écrasez l'infâme" —Voltaire
http://www.aarongreenspan.com
—Elon Musk's Lawyers
"Écrasez l'infâme" —Voltaire
http://www.aarongreenspan.com
This is what keeps Trump supporters supporting Trump.
January 10, 2026 at 1:20 AM
This is what keeps Trump supporters supporting Trump.
January 7, 2026 at 10:15 PM
Can you believe this?
I'm losing to this.
Elon Musk isn't a defendant in my case, he's a "Qazi."
I'm losing to this.
Elon Musk isn't a defendant in my case, he's a "Qazi."
January 5, 2026 at 9:30 PM
Can you believe this?
I'm losing to this.
Elon Musk isn't a defendant in my case, he's a "Qazi."
I'm losing to this.
Elon Musk isn't a defendant in my case, he's a "Qazi."
Hey, lawyers...
If anyone has a second, I could use a sanity check.
Is this quote real?
It's nominally from Flatley v. Mauro (which is real), 139 P.3d 2, 46 Cal.Rptr.3d 606, 39 Cal.4th 299, 320 (Cal. 2006).
If anyone has a second, I could use a sanity check.
Is this quote real?
It's nominally from Flatley v. Mauro (which is real), 139 P.3d 2, 46 Cal.Rptr.3d 606, 39 Cal.4th 299, 320 (Cal. 2006).
December 31, 2025 at 11:20 PM
Hey, lawyers...
If anyone has a second, I could use a sanity check.
Is this quote real?
It's nominally from Flatley v. Mauro (which is real), 139 P.3d 2, 46 Cal.Rptr.3d 606, 39 Cal.4th 299, 320 (Cal. 2006).
If anyone has a second, I could use a sanity check.
Is this quote real?
It's nominally from Flatley v. Mauro (which is real), 139 P.3d 2, 46 Cal.Rptr.3d 606, 39 Cal.4th 299, 320 (Cal. 2006).
Totally agree. Yet I don't think there's a published case that says this anywhere.
Meanwhile here's what an actual judge—who uses AI to write his opinions—says (www.plainsite.org/dockets/down...), citing...nothing:
Meanwhile here's what an actual judge—who uses AI to write his opinions—says (www.plainsite.org/dockets/down...), citing...nothing:
December 28, 2025 at 2:09 AM
Totally agree. Yet I don't think there's a published case that says this anywhere.
Meanwhile here's what an actual judge—who uses AI to write his opinions—says (www.plainsite.org/dockets/down...), citing...nothing:
Meanwhile here's what an actual judge—who uses AI to write his opinions—says (www.plainsite.org/dockets/down...), citing...nothing:
We're on the same page there.
And yet, does Code of Civil Procedure § 585(f), referred to in (b), encompass "Special" Motions to Strike?
And yet, does Code of Civil Procedure § 585(f), referred to in (b), encompass "Special" Motions to Strike?
December 28, 2025 at 1:59 AM
We're on the same page there.
And yet, does Code of Civil Procedure § 585(f), referred to in (b), encompass "Special" Motions to Strike?
And yet, does Code of Civil Procedure § 585(f), referred to in (b), encompass "Special" Motions to Strike?
The Epstein Files are coming to PlainSite...
December 23, 2025 at 8:57 AM
The Epstein Files are coming to PlainSite...
If I'm not being attacked in court, I'm being attacked on-line.
Sigh.
Sigh.
December 22, 2025 at 4:05 PM
If I'm not being attacked in court, I'm being attacked on-line.
Sigh.
Sigh.
Left: Omar today, on Twitter
Right: Omar in federal court, under oath, on November 21, 2024 (CAND Case No. 3:24-cv-04647-MMC, ECF No. 117-2)
My question: How do you "filter" something you never "received"?
Right: Omar in federal court, under oath, on November 21, 2024 (CAND Case No. 3:24-cv-04647-MMC, ECF No. 117-2)
My question: How do you "filter" something you never "received"?
December 12, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Left: Omar today, on Twitter
Right: Omar in federal court, under oath, on November 21, 2024 (CAND Case No. 3:24-cv-04647-MMC, ECF No. 117-2)
My question: How do you "filter" something you never "received"?
Right: Omar in federal court, under oath, on November 21, 2024 (CAND Case No. 3:24-cv-04647-MMC, ECF No. 117-2)
My question: How do you "filter" something you never "received"?
This required a few prompts and manual tweaking, but not bad overall I think.
December 11, 2025 at 2:09 AM
This required a few prompts and manual tweaking, but not bad overall I think.
Yes, I said this in a deposition and I find it mildly amusing.
December 8, 2025 at 8:52 PM
Yes, I said this in a deposition and I find it mildly amusing.
Just looking over Omar Qazi's reply brief in support of his anti-SLAPP motion, which he filed after being defaulted without ever filing a responsive pleading.
Assuming Grok wrote this for him, it's pretty good evidence that you should never use Grok as your lawyer.
Assuming Grok wrote this for him, it's pretty good evidence that you should never use Grok as your lawyer.
December 5, 2025 at 7:17 AM
Just looking over Omar Qazi's reply brief in support of his anti-SLAPP motion, which he filed after being defaulted without ever filing a responsive pleading.
Assuming Grok wrote this for him, it's pretty good evidence that you should never use Grok as your lawyer.
Assuming Grok wrote this for him, it's pretty good evidence that you should never use Grok as your lawyer.
The Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco seems to be frozen in time as of December 1. From what I can tell, the Register of Actions across all cases has not been updated in three days.
This is strange.
This is strange.
December 4, 2025 at 9:55 PM
The Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco seems to be frozen in time as of December 1. From what I can tell, the Register of Actions across all cases has not been updated in three days.
This is strange.
This is strange.
It's that time of year again, when no one, myself included, can figure out how to write four numbers in a row correctly. But you'd think federal judges have staff to help them with this sort of thing.
December 4, 2025 at 2:29 AM
It's that time of year again, when no one, myself included, can figure out how to write four numbers in a row correctly. But you'd think federal judges have staff to help them with this sort of thing.
Huh, I bet I know a podcast Omar would like... www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFe7...
November 30, 2025 at 2:07 AM
Huh, I bet I know a podcast Omar would like... www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFe7...
There are none (that are published). All we know for sure is that they are lying.
I estimate real actual people using the Facebook platform worldwide at closer to 400-500 million tops.
I estimate real actual people using the Facebook platform worldwide at closer to 400-500 million tops.
November 26, 2025 at 7:49 PM
There are none (that are published). All we know for sure is that they are lying.
I estimate real actual people using the Facebook platform worldwide at closer to 400-500 million tops.
I estimate real actual people using the Facebook platform worldwide at closer to 400-500 million tops.
Anti-SLAPP law in a nutshell.
Left: what the court provided on the docket (see www.plainsite.org/dockets/down...)
Right: my Photoshop-based redline
Left: what the court provided on the docket (see www.plainsite.org/dockets/down...)
Right: my Photoshop-based redline
November 25, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Anti-SLAPP law in a nutshell.
Left: what the court provided on the docket (see www.plainsite.org/dockets/down...)
Right: my Photoshop-based redline
Left: what the court provided on the docket (see www.plainsite.org/dockets/down...)
Right: my Photoshop-based redline
Ten points if you can figure out exactly what is going on here just from this image, which is crucial to Elon Musk's future.
November 24, 2025 at 9:34 PM
Ten points if you can figure out exactly what is going on here just from this image, which is crucial to Elon Musk's future.
One nice feature I built into PlainSite Pro is the "Days Since Case Inception" indicator for each filing.
"Days Since Case Inception: 1,213"
www.plainsite.org/dockets/535y...
"Days Since Case Inception: 1,213"
www.plainsite.org/dockets/535y...
November 22, 2025 at 4:09 AM
One nice feature I built into PlainSite Pro is the "Days Since Case Inception" indicator for each filing.
"Days Since Case Inception: 1,213"
www.plainsite.org/dockets/535y...
"Days Since Case Inception: 1,213"
www.plainsite.org/dockets/535y...
So there's a decision in the DMV v. Tesla case. It was issued yesterday. But no you can't see it because some idiot in the California government misinterpreted a stupid law.
Everything is like this. Sigh.
Everything is like this. Sigh.
November 22, 2025 at 4:04 AM
So there's a decision in the DMV v. Tesla case. It was issued yesterday. But no you can't see it because some idiot in the California government misinterpreted a stupid law.
Everything is like this. Sigh.
Everything is like this. Sigh.
Elon's numbers have always been very reliable.
November 21, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Elon's numbers have always been very reliable.
Every time I see an official Tesla Robotaxi photo my brain immediately goes "SHAMPOO BOTTLE?"
It's the font.
It's the font.
November 20, 2025 at 1:12 AM
Every time I see an official Tesla Robotaxi photo my brain immediately goes "SHAMPOO BOTTLE?"
It's the font.
It's the font.
In the Year of our Lord 2025, these specific portions of a document are what threw the case I *would* have won for the richest man on Earth.
One is a citation that doesn't exist.
One is a quotation that doesn't exist from a citation that does.
One is the judge ignoring half of the section he cites.
One is a citation that doesn't exist.
One is a quotation that doesn't exist from a citation that does.
One is the judge ignoring half of the section he cites.
November 19, 2025 at 5:01 AM
In the Year of our Lord 2025, these specific portions of a document are what threw the case I *would* have won for the richest man on Earth.
One is a citation that doesn't exist.
One is a quotation that doesn't exist from a citation that does.
One is the judge ignoring half of the section he cites.
One is a citation that doesn't exist.
One is a quotation that doesn't exist from a citation that does.
One is the judge ignoring half of the section he cites.
AI is occasionally good for something. I gave it an assist with Photoshop in some places here, though.
![An AI-generated New Yorker-style cartoon about Trump's MRI. The caption is "It's the most incredible example of acute neuronal loss I've ever seen on MRI! [pause] Let's just tell him without those words in the middle."](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:shyysmwj7mw3ky6xet7cq2oa/bafkreidfsefhiikx3dyla6t37lhoswnf4enief3fahaxftca5sv7n2bbaa@jpeg)
November 15, 2025 at 7:04 PM
AI is occasionally good for something. I gave it an assist with Photoshop in some places here, though.