@abbydoull.bsky.social
Epstein: Do you know how to get in touch with x?
Response: Yeah. His cousin’s brother-in-law Joe X goes to same gym as me.
So now Joe X is guilty?
Context is important.
Number of times someone is mentioned &/or referenced is important.
Being mentioned once or twice shouldn’t condemn someone.
Response: Yeah. His cousin’s brother-in-law Joe X goes to same gym as me.
So now Joe X is guilty?
Context is important.
Number of times someone is mentioned &/or referenced is important.
Being mentioned once or twice shouldn’t condemn someone.
February 13, 2026 at 10:03 PM
Epstein: Do you know how to get in touch with x?
Response: Yeah. His cousin’s brother-in-law Joe X goes to same gym as me.
So now Joe X is guilty?
Context is important.
Number of times someone is mentioned &/or referenced is important.
Being mentioned once or twice shouldn’t condemn someone.
Response: Yeah. His cousin’s brother-in-law Joe X goes to same gym as me.
So now Joe X is guilty?
Context is important.
Number of times someone is mentioned &/or referenced is important.
Being mentioned once or twice shouldn’t condemn someone.
When will Congress subpoena Dan Bongino?
February 13, 2026 at 9:49 PM
When will Congress subpoena Dan Bongino?
Absolutely. It’s not just the fossil fuel corporations. It’s a lot of the wealthy corporations & individuals like Musk, Bezos, etc.
February 13, 2026 at 7:48 PM
Absolutely. It’s not just the fossil fuel corporations. It’s a lot of the wealthy corporations & individuals like Musk, Bezos, etc.
It’s the failure of REPUBLICANS & the ignorance of the American population (which is what the GOP wanted & worked to create).
February 13, 2026 at 7:46 PM
It’s the failure of REPUBLICANS & the ignorance of the American population (which is what the GOP wanted & worked to create).
Essentially, the system that is in place already works. Can it be improved upon, yes (ie requiring paper ballot backups), but it works well right now.
February 13, 2026 at 7:06 AM
Essentially, the system that is in place already works. Can it be improved upon, yes (ie requiring paper ballot backups), but it works well right now.
There’s a part of all this that gets overlooked.
Every state (I think) requires IDs to REGISTER to vote.
And just about every state (might be all 50 though I’m not sure) requires any unregistered voter who shows up at polls to confirm identity at some point in order for that ballot to be counted.
Every state (I think) requires IDs to REGISTER to vote.
And just about every state (might be all 50 though I’m not sure) requires any unregistered voter who shows up at polls to confirm identity at some point in order for that ballot to be counted.
February 13, 2026 at 7:06 AM
There’s a part of all this that gets overlooked.
Every state (I think) requires IDs to REGISTER to vote.
And just about every state (might be all 50 though I’m not sure) requires any unregistered voter who shows up at polls to confirm identity at some point in order for that ballot to be counted.
Every state (I think) requires IDs to REGISTER to vote.
And just about every state (might be all 50 though I’m not sure) requires any unregistered voter who shows up at polls to confirm identity at some point in order for that ballot to be counted.
Can’t say I have an ounce of empathy for American Farmers.
They did this to themselves.
It will have a negative impact on us all when the corporations take over these farms/lands.
It’s maddening how a small segment can screw the whole country over. Now & going forward.
No sympathy
No empathy
They did this to themselves.
It will have a negative impact on us all when the corporations take over these farms/lands.
It’s maddening how a small segment can screw the whole country over. Now & going forward.
No sympathy
No empathy
February 13, 2026 at 6:51 AM
Can’t say I have an ounce of empathy for American Farmers.
They did this to themselves.
It will have a negative impact on us all when the corporations take over these farms/lands.
It’s maddening how a small segment can screw the whole country over. Now & going forward.
No sympathy
No empathy
They did this to themselves.
It will have a negative impact on us all when the corporations take over these farms/lands.
It’s maddening how a small segment can screw the whole country over. Now & going forward.
No sympathy
No empathy
This decision is based on 2 things alone:
1. Money for fossil fuel corporations
2. The Right’s unwillingness to admit humans are responsible.
The sad thing is at this point it doesn’t matter what the causes were. The only thing that matters now is how can we prevent it from getting worse.
1. Money for fossil fuel corporations
2. The Right’s unwillingness to admit humans are responsible.
The sad thing is at this point it doesn’t matter what the causes were. The only thing that matters now is how can we prevent it from getting worse.
February 13, 2026 at 6:46 AM
This decision is based on 2 things alone:
1. Money for fossil fuel corporations
2. The Right’s unwillingness to admit humans are responsible.
The sad thing is at this point it doesn’t matter what the causes were. The only thing that matters now is how can we prevent it from getting worse.
1. Money for fossil fuel corporations
2. The Right’s unwillingness to admit humans are responsible.
The sad thing is at this point it doesn’t matter what the causes were. The only thing that matters now is how can we prevent it from getting worse.
Part of law enforcement training is being able to handle person, groups, etc. yelling at you & not responding w/force.
Evidently ICE agents can’t even master the whole "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me" mantra.
Not surprising however.
Evidently ICE agents can’t even master the whole "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me" mantra.
Not surprising however.
February 13, 2026 at 5:08 AM
Part of law enforcement training is being able to handle person, groups, etc. yelling at you & not responding w/force.
Evidently ICE agents can’t even master the whole "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me" mantra.
Not surprising however.
Evidently ICE agents can’t even master the whole "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me" mantra.
Not surprising however.
Still wondering why media isn’t asking about sending ICE to Texas & Florida; states w/the highest numbers of undocumented immigrants.
February 13, 2026 at 4:51 AM
Still wondering why media isn’t asking about sending ICE to Texas & Florida; states w/the highest numbers of undocumented immigrants.
Or if they got shot (for no reason).
February 13, 2026 at 4:49 AM
Or if they got shot (for no reason).
If that applies to military families then once AGAIN it’s a blatant slap in the face to military from Trump.
Now not only are those who served, or are serving, “suckers” & “losers”, but now if your family were stationed overseas your baby might not be a citizen?
Why does military support this 🤡
Now not only are those who served, or are serving, “suckers” & “losers”, but now if your family were stationed overseas your baby might not be a citizen?
Why does military support this 🤡
February 13, 2026 at 4:31 AM
If that applies to military families then once AGAIN it’s a blatant slap in the face to military from Trump.
Now not only are those who served, or are serving, “suckers” & “losers”, but now if your family were stationed overseas your baby might not be a citizen?
Why does military support this 🤡
Now not only are those who served, or are serving, “suckers” & “losers”, but now if your family were stationed overseas your baby might not be a citizen?
Why does military support this 🤡
They are extraordinary creatures to see up close.
Fortunate enough to have seen them up close 3 times.
Once w/a handler & twice in the wild (one where the eagle swooped down & grabbed a fish maybe 3 meters from me).
Fortunate enough to have seen them up close 3 times.
Once w/a handler & twice in the wild (one where the eagle swooped down & grabbed a fish maybe 3 meters from me).
February 13, 2026 at 4:12 AM
They are extraordinary creatures to see up close.
Fortunate enough to have seen them up close 3 times.
Once w/a handler & twice in the wild (one where the eagle swooped down & grabbed a fish maybe 3 meters from me).
Fortunate enough to have seen them up close 3 times.
Once w/a handler & twice in the wild (one where the eagle swooped down & grabbed a fish maybe 3 meters from me).
Makes it more amusing to me for some reason that it was a female.
February 13, 2026 at 4:08 AM
Makes it more amusing to me for some reason that it was a female.
And because so many in this nation are so amazingly ignorant that they’ll believe so much 🐂💩.
February 13, 2026 at 4:06 AM
And because so many in this nation are so amazingly ignorant that they’ll believe so much 🐂💩.
Maybe we should’ve passed that GOP bill that would’ve allowed members of Congress to sue DOJ for investigating/spying on them w/o being informed about it.
🤷🏼♀️
FYI, I’m not in favor of that bill, but it’s ironic how GOP & this admin were so upset about being justifiably looked into & now they do same.
🤷🏼♀️
FYI, I’m not in favor of that bill, but it’s ironic how GOP & this admin were so upset about being justifiably looked into & now they do same.
February 13, 2026 at 4:04 AM
Maybe we should’ve passed that GOP bill that would’ve allowed members of Congress to sue DOJ for investigating/spying on them w/o being informed about it.
🤷🏼♀️
FYI, I’m not in favor of that bill, but it’s ironic how GOP & this admin were so upset about being justifiably looked into & now they do same.
🤷🏼♀️
FYI, I’m not in favor of that bill, but it’s ironic how GOP & this admin were so upset about being justifiably looked into & now they do same.
Could be that the loud one is the female yelling at the male (ie wife nagging the husband).
February 13, 2026 at 4:00 AM
Could be that the loud one is the female yelling at the male (ie wife nagging the husband).
So the female gets an average name while the male gets the extravagantly flattering name.
Do male Bald Eagles have their own version of small penis syndrome?
** I know they didn’t name themselves or even chose the names. I J
Do male Bald Eagles have their own version of small penis syndrome?
** I know they didn’t name themselves or even chose the names. I J
February 13, 2026 at 3:58 AM
So the female gets an average name while the male gets the extravagantly flattering name.
Do male Bald Eagles have their own version of small penis syndrome?
** I know they didn’t name themselves or even chose the names. I J
Do male Bald Eagles have their own version of small penis syndrome?
** I know they didn’t name themselves or even chose the names. I J
The DOJ is doing a wonderful job at making any case they bring before any judge look like a joke.
At some point legitimate cases are going to fall through, get dismissed, end in acquittal due to their lack of credibility, improper investigative processes, &/or flat out lies.
Truly Unbelievable!
At some point legitimate cases are going to fall through, get dismissed, end in acquittal due to their lack of credibility, improper investigative processes, &/or flat out lies.
Truly Unbelievable!
February 13, 2026 at 3:48 AM
The DOJ is doing a wonderful job at making any case they bring before any judge look like a joke.
At some point legitimate cases are going to fall through, get dismissed, end in acquittal due to their lack of credibility, improper investigative processes, &/or flat out lies.
Truly Unbelievable!
At some point legitimate cases are going to fall through, get dismissed, end in acquittal due to their lack of credibility, improper investigative processes, &/or flat out lies.
Truly Unbelievable!
Desperate to stay on Trump’s good side. If she fails, even the slightest bit, her chances at a pardon are nil.
Chances for a pardon if you’re on his good side are a crap shoot to begin with, but if you fail him, you have absolutely no chance.
Chances for a pardon if you’re on his good side are a crap shoot to begin with, but if you fail him, you have absolutely no chance.
February 13, 2026 at 3:43 AM
Desperate to stay on Trump’s good side. If she fails, even the slightest bit, her chances at a pardon are nil.
Chances for a pardon if you’re on his good side are a crap shoot to begin with, but if you fail him, you have absolutely no chance.
Chances for a pardon if you’re on his good side are a crap shoot to begin with, but if you fail him, you have absolutely no chance.
My response is ALWAYS, “But what did Jesus say?”
If they are REAL Christians then what Jesus said is all that counts.
Love one another
Love thy neighbor
Do unto others….
He who believes in me….
End of story. If they can’t follow Jesus then they aren’t Christian.
If they are REAL Christians then what Jesus said is all that counts.
Love one another
Love thy neighbor
Do unto others….
He who believes in me….
End of story. If they can’t follow Jesus then they aren’t Christian.
February 13, 2026 at 3:41 AM
My response is ALWAYS, “But what did Jesus say?”
If they are REAL Christians then what Jesus said is all that counts.
Love one another
Love thy neighbor
Do unto others….
He who believes in me….
End of story. If they can’t follow Jesus then they aren’t Christian.
If they are REAL Christians then what Jesus said is all that counts.
Love one another
Love thy neighbor
Do unto others….
He who believes in me….
End of story. If they can’t follow Jesus then they aren’t Christian.
Another example of every statement being a projection.
He knows the Files PROVE his GUILT.
He knows the Files PROVE his GUILT.
February 13, 2026 at 3:36 AM
Another example of every statement being a projection.
He knows the Files PROVE his GUILT.
He knows the Files PROVE his GUILT.
If we see people resigning b/c they had some sort of relationship & only had name mention a few times, it means these people know they were/are in the wrong & are worried about it.
So if your name is mentioned hundreds (nevermind thousands) of times, you had to be deeply involved w/some nasty 💩.
So if your name is mentioned hundreds (nevermind thousands) of times, you had to be deeply involved w/some nasty 💩.
February 13, 2026 at 3:31 AM
If we see people resigning b/c they had some sort of relationship & only had name mention a few times, it means these people know they were/are in the wrong & are worried about it.
So if your name is mentioned hundreds (nevermind thousands) of times, you had to be deeply involved w/some nasty 💩.
So if your name is mentioned hundreds (nevermind thousands) of times, you had to be deeply involved w/some nasty 💩.
Amazing how these people are resigning. They’re not being fired (which may be ok if it means it makes them ineligible for unemployment benefits &/or company benefits) though.
Yet, we can’t get Congress to even consider investigating a man whose name is mentioned thousands of times in the Files.
Yet, we can’t get Congress to even consider investigating a man whose name is mentioned thousands of times in the Files.
February 13, 2026 at 3:31 AM
Amazing how these people are resigning. They’re not being fired (which may be ok if it means it makes them ineligible for unemployment benefits &/or company benefits) though.
Yet, we can’t get Congress to even consider investigating a man whose name is mentioned thousands of times in the Files.
Yet, we can’t get Congress to even consider investigating a man whose name is mentioned thousands of times in the Files.
Your post “should be prosecuted”
To date UK has NOT announced any PROSECUTIONS; but have however announced multiple INVESTIGATIONS.
So UK has NOT determined yet whether or not there SHOULD be (or if there will be) any prosecutions.
So UK doesn’t believe prosecutions should happen. Not yet anyway.
To date UK has NOT announced any PROSECUTIONS; but have however announced multiple INVESTIGATIONS.
So UK has NOT determined yet whether or not there SHOULD be (or if there will be) any prosecutions.
So UK doesn’t believe prosecutions should happen. Not yet anyway.
February 13, 2026 at 3:25 AM
Your post “should be prosecuted”
To date UK has NOT announced any PROSECUTIONS; but have however announced multiple INVESTIGATIONS.
So UK has NOT determined yet whether or not there SHOULD be (or if there will be) any prosecutions.
So UK doesn’t believe prosecutions should happen. Not yet anyway.
To date UK has NOT announced any PROSECUTIONS; but have however announced multiple INVESTIGATIONS.
So UK has NOT determined yet whether or not there SHOULD be (or if there will be) any prosecutions.
So UK doesn’t believe prosecutions should happen. Not yet anyway.