This reads as pejorative, but it just sounds like you are sad about the sci-fi club not being exclusive enough anymore. Great books that are sci-fi are still being written and the genre is evolving. Is the sci-fi equivalent of navel gazing black hole gazing? Check this out

No more embarrassed than with any other president re: foreign policy. This country has sided with dictators and used countries as pawns for strategic gain for decades.

2/n @stuartbuck.bsky.social lays out a compelling case and identifies the key statute that makes what NIH is attempting to do ultra vires (Title II, Division H, Section 224 of Public Law 118-47). The plaint text of Section 224 forbids this type of adjustment. goodscience.substack.com/p/indirect-c...

You hold all the cards

That is like a comic book level theory of evil. It’s more just narcissism in the vein of moderation and experience being more appealing than brash youngsters.

That is nice lol. I like the poems/meditations you post fyi.

The answers are yes and yes.

Most major car makers have entered into private agreements with the state that supersede the waiver situation, so that is at least hopeful.

I am subscribed to both your newsletters :-) Though might need to take a break from Zeke’s only because I think I may not be the audience for it. Thank you so much for your work @katharinehayhoe.com.

How healthy would you say it is to keep up to date with these GMST projections? Paging @hausfath.bsky.social too. I feel like my mood is being highly tuned to these updates on global temps. Apologies for putting either of you in the role of a therapist.

Would this be a new feedback discovered/observed or just confirmation of one already known and in models to a degree? Would this be a human caused feedback? I guess it doesn’t matter…it’s there.

Misinterpreting science and spreading misinformation is kinda bad. Please just avoid it.

Yah it is pretty academic. He is one of the most respected climate scientists out there. Best leave the science to the scientists

Gavin Schmidt didn’t good write up of these results. He suggests you should not take them at face value. www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar...

Thank you for your paper. I’ve always wondered how scientists like yourself deal with results like this. Do they excite you, scare, both.

Is it correct to say most of record low albedo was regional? This a lot of record warming was regional too? Global means are obviously important as a grounding for models, but impacts and predictions are most meaningful at a regional level.