The point is to be seen trying to improve the economy. It can improve from any point, this need not include self-flagellation. But telling people "no, you're wrong to feel like you're struggling" is very poor politics and has never worked.
February 6, 2026 at 4:17 AM
The point is to be seen trying to improve the economy. It can improve from any point, this need not include self-flagellation. But telling people "no, you're wrong to feel like you're struggling" is very poor politics and has never worked.
You said "if you validate people's unhappiness as an incumbent party in the White House, you should expect to lose." That's an obvious exaggeration of what messaging can accomplish. The unhappiness itself is the problem. You cannot ignore it and hope it goes away. Pretending otherwise is foolish.
February 6, 2026 at 1:41 AM
You said "if you validate people's unhappiness as an incumbent party in the White House, you should expect to lose." That's an obvious exaggeration of what messaging can accomplish. The unhappiness itself is the problem. You cannot ignore it and hope it goes away. Pretending otherwise is foolish.
I'm unconvinced that an incumbent party's validation or lack thereof has that much clout. But, you're in luck in one regard. Trump is attempting to do as you recommend and is refusing to validate economic negativity. We'll see how that works for the incumbent party soon.
February 5, 2026 at 10:10 PM
I'm unconvinced that an incumbent party's validation or lack thereof has that much clout. But, you're in luck in one regard. Trump is attempting to do as you recommend and is refusing to validate economic negativity. We'll see how that works for the incumbent party soon.
Are you implying the solution is to tell people that they're wrong to be unhappy? I wouldn't recommend pols insult people's intelligence like that, but commentators can ofc. Agreed that negative econ sentiment is hard to overcome, but I don't think it works to claim that it's misguided.
February 5, 2026 at 8:57 PM
Are you implying the solution is to tell people that they're wrong to be unhappy? I wouldn't recommend pols insult people's intelligence like that, but commentators can ofc. Agreed that negative econ sentiment is hard to overcome, but I don't think it works to claim that it's misguided.
If you want my theory on why sentiment is getting worse: media, esp. social, has a negativity bias, and there's many reasons for negativity. EG: The frequency of people fundraising online to avoid medical bankruptcy. I just don't think it wise to dismiss economic negativity even if it's a "vibe."
February 5, 2026 at 8:02 PM
If you want my theory on why sentiment is getting worse: media, esp. social, has a negativity bias, and there's many reasons for negativity. EG: The frequency of people fundraising online to avoid medical bankruptcy. I just don't think it wise to dismiss economic negativity even if it's a "vibe."
I agree that economic sentiment is socially constructed. I don't think that will change, though. "Inflation" isn't the key per se; affordability includes housing, medical debt, etc. I think many people feel potential for their own poverty, & it makes them more receptive to negative sentiment.
February 5, 2026 at 7:41 PM
I agree that economic sentiment is socially constructed. I don't think that will change, though. "Inflation" isn't the key per se; affordability includes housing, medical debt, etc. I think many people feel potential for their own poverty, & it makes them more receptive to negative sentiment.
"Permanently miserable" is an asinine line to draw: pedantic and concedes political space. There's a difference between "being mad about prices rising" (a fact) and "being permanently mad" (an impossible strawman; who says what's permanent?). Are you willing to lose elections until anger subsides?
February 5, 2026 at 7:16 PM
"Permanently miserable" is an asinine line to draw: pedantic and concedes political space. There's a difference between "being mad about prices rising" (a fact) and "being permanently mad" (an impossible strawman; who says what's permanent?). Are you willing to lose elections until anger subsides?
"Nice argument you have there. But too late, I've already labeled you as 'the boy who cried wolf' in this meme. Therefore, you talking about bad things is the real problem."
March 20, 2025 at 2:59 PM
"Nice argument you have there. But too late, I've already labeled you as 'the boy who cried wolf' in this meme. Therefore, you talking about bad things is the real problem."