The idea that this effort to reform the legislature is meaningless if it does not also apply to the executive (a plausible example of “Trump Derangement Syndrome”); and, implying that calling one Democrat a “scumbag” shows bad faith (an attempt to enforce conformity within a political ‘tribe’).
December 21, 2025 at 9:26 PM
The idea that this effort to reform the legislature is meaningless if it does not also apply to the executive (a plausible example of “Trump Derangement Syndrome”); and, implying that calling one Democrat a “scumbag” shows bad faith (an attempt to enforce conformity within a political ‘tribe’).
Sherry, it seems to me that your ability to think rationally and compassionately about the issue of corruption in politics has been compromised by your political polarization. It’s called a “duopoly” for a reason.
December 21, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Sherry, it seems to me that your ability to think rationally and compassionately about the issue of corruption in politics has been compromised by your political polarization. It’s called a “duopoly” for a reason.
“This is not only an unserious effort, it’s an attempt to undermine and kill off the only bipartisan legislative vehicle that is gaining momentum. It’s really bad faith all around.”
December 21, 2025 at 2:02 PM
“This is not only an unserious effort, it’s an attempt to undermine and kill off the only bipartisan legislative vehicle that is gaining momentum. It’s really bad faith all around.”
What do you guys think about Kennedy’s claim to be “shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate”?
Is there any truth to the idea that whole virus vaccines are more durable in the long run?
Would it be worth funding both approaches?
August 21, 2025 at 9:51 PM
What do you guys think about Kennedy’s claim to be “shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate”?
Is there any truth to the idea that whole virus vaccines are more durable in the long run?