AckworthMichael
@ackworthmichael.bsky.social
Performer, Dad, office worker, refugee from the “other place”. In no particular order. Into politics, movies, gaming and the theatre.
The tangerine twitler isn’t leaving. He will manufacture some excuse to either not hold an election or make damn sure it’s the winner. When he dies, he’ll hand it down to one of his idiot sons.
You were warned and most of you chose to not vote because Harris wasn’t tough enough on Israel.
You were warned and most of you chose to not vote because Harris wasn’t tough enough on Israel.
July 31, 2025 at 8:05 PM
The tangerine twitler isn’t leaving. He will manufacture some excuse to either not hold an election or make damn sure it’s the winner. When he dies, he’ll hand it down to one of his idiot sons.
You were warned and most of you chose to not vote because Harris wasn’t tough enough on Israel.
You were warned and most of you chose to not vote because Harris wasn’t tough enough on Israel.
Yes it tells me I’m not on here much. You have a counter argument as to why she shouldn’t call a by election?
July 30, 2025 at 8:30 AM
Yes it tells me I’m not on here much. You have a counter argument as to why she shouldn’t call a by election?
But you still don’t see anything wrong with not calling a by election having hard resources from a party you don’t support to get in.
July 30, 2025 at 8:20 AM
But you still don’t see anything wrong with not calling a by election having hard resources from a party you don’t support to get in.
You need to remember he piled up votes in Labour strongholds in 2017 but failed to gain them in none Labour areas. You they need to remember he lost votes all over the place in 2019. Then you need to remember members don’t equal votes.
July 28, 2025 at 5:44 AM
You need to remember he piled up votes in Labour strongholds in 2017 but failed to gain them in none Labour areas. You they need to remember he lost votes all over the place in 2019. Then you need to remember members don’t equal votes.
Well you should have no problem testing that in a by election then, should you? You have no democratic credibility when you were elected using Labour resources. Stand down and call a by election. Corbyn at least did.
July 26, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Well you should have no problem testing that in a by election then, should you? You have no democratic credibility when you were elected using Labour resources. Stand down and call a by election. Corbyn at least did.
They have 4 MPs and at least stood for election. Until Sultana stands as an independent reform have more democratic credibility than this party. And I hate reform.
July 26, 2025 at 10:15 AM
They have 4 MPs and at least stood for election. Until Sultana stands as an independent reform have more democratic credibility than this party. And I hate reform.
So this party is representing change and restoring honesty?
Why, then, is its deputy leader someone who used funds and resources from a party she so vehemently opposes to get elected then refuses to call a by election?
Hardly says integrity does it? Corbyn at least stood and won as an independent.
Why, then, is its deputy leader someone who used funds and resources from a party she so vehemently opposes to get elected then refuses to call a by election?
Hardly says integrity does it? Corbyn at least stood and won as an independent.
July 25, 2025 at 11:50 AM
So this party is representing change and restoring honesty?
Why, then, is its deputy leader someone who used funds and resources from a party she so vehemently opposes to get elected then refuses to call a by election?
Hardly says integrity does it? Corbyn at least stood and won as an independent.
Why, then, is its deputy leader someone who used funds and resources from a party she so vehemently opposes to get elected then refuses to call a by election?
Hardly says integrity does it? Corbyn at least stood and won as an independent.
Just a couple of things:
1) How do you know the EU want us?
2) How do you know what the terms?
3) Would you have another ref?
4) What if the terms were unfavourable? E.g joining the euro etc
5) How would you deal with those parties who would instantly fight to remove us and the anti EU feeling ?
1) How do you know the EU want us?
2) How do you know what the terms?
3) Would you have another ref?
4) What if the terms were unfavourable? E.g joining the euro etc
5) How would you deal with those parties who would instantly fight to remove us and the anti EU feeling ?
July 24, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Just a couple of things:
1) How do you know the EU want us?
2) How do you know what the terms?
3) Would you have another ref?
4) What if the terms were unfavourable? E.g joining the euro etc
5) How would you deal with those parties who would instantly fight to remove us and the anti EU feeling ?
1) How do you know the EU want us?
2) How do you know what the terms?
3) Would you have another ref?
4) What if the terms were unfavourable? E.g joining the euro etc
5) How would you deal with those parties who would instantly fight to remove us and the anti EU feeling ?
As in stop giving them money which they’re using for weapons. Anything that is used for this war.
July 24, 2025 at 11:00 AM
As in stop giving them money which they’re using for weapons. Anything that is used for this war.
Strangely, I have never read a detailed plan of how such a policy, with all the relevant reforms to the existing tax system, happens. It’s only three words. Tax the rich.
Similar to stop the boats. Well done you’ve learned three words to describe something hard. Now explain how.
Similar to stop the boats. Well done you’ve learned three words to describe something hard. Now explain how.
July 24, 2025 at 10:23 AM
Strangely, I have never read a detailed plan of how such a policy, with all the relevant reforms to the existing tax system, happens. It’s only three words. Tax the rich.
Similar to stop the boats. Well done you’ve learned three words to describe something hard. Now explain how.
Similar to stop the boats. Well done you’ve learned three words to describe something hard. Now explain how.
Is there a reason why our government isn’t saying “we’re giving you nothing more” and just cutting ties?
July 24, 2025 at 9:19 AM
Is there a reason why our government isn’t saying “we’re giving you nothing more” and just cutting ties?
Yes. When they are constantly wanging on about waste and how they’ll tackle it.
July 24, 2025 at 7:00 AM
Yes. When they are constantly wanging on about waste and how they’ll tackle it.
The government?
July 22, 2025 at 6:26 PM
The government?
So? In September call all the votes you gotta and subpoena the living hell out of him! This is the same speaker that says he’d delay the vote on the Big Beautiful Bill until dissenters had been dealt with. It’s not a government it’s a crime syndicate.
July 22, 2025 at 3:38 PM
So? In September call all the votes you gotta and subpoena the living hell out of him! This is the same speaker that says he’d delay the vote on the Big Beautiful Bill until dissenters had been dealt with. It’s not a government it’s a crime syndicate.
Nah. She wouldn’t get half as much attention that way. That’s the point it’s all posturing.
July 9, 2025 at 4:16 PM
Nah. She wouldn’t get half as much attention that way. That’s the point it’s all posturing.
I personally do yes.
July 7, 2025 at 7:20 PM
I personally do yes.
Yes he does. But I don’t see how that negates my point.
July 4, 2025 at 8:51 PM
Yes he does. But I don’t see how that negates my point.
I’m looking forward to her announcing she’s triggering a by election then.
July 4, 2025 at 4:12 PM
I’m looking forward to her announcing she’s triggering a by election then.
Not really. Other than this incident I know very little about her. I certainly don’t know enough to know whether she’d win any potential by election. I’m just pointing out a double standard on her part.
July 4, 2025 at 2:45 PM
Not really. Other than this incident I know very little about her. I certainly don’t know enough to know whether she’d win any potential by election. I’m just pointing out a double standard on her part.