Bumblebee
@actualt.bsky.social
Will he be awake then?
December 4, 2025 at 1:05 PM
Will he be awake then?
"That's not something we can be supportive of RIGHT NOW,". In other words, they have long term plans for the same, so ‘don’t jump the gun’ too quickly. SICK!!!
October 23, 2025 at 9:17 AM
"That's not something we can be supportive of RIGHT NOW,". In other words, they have long term plans for the same, so ‘don’t jump the gun’ too quickly. SICK!!!
Can Chuck Schumer please retire and let someone younger who the voters can connect with take the lead. OMG, it’s beyond time!!!
August 6, 2025 at 11:57 AM
Can Chuck Schumer please retire and let someone younger who the voters can connect with take the lead. OMG, it’s beyond time!!!
A follow-up post, clearly I was correct as Trump has fired the head of Labor Statistics for publishing accurate data.
Don’t trust anything else to be published from now as accurate. What does the future of the U.S. economy look like…? Time will tell.
Don’t trust anything else to be published from now as accurate. What does the future of the U.S. economy look like…? Time will tell.
August 5, 2025 at 11:38 AM
A follow-up post, clearly I was correct as Trump has fired the head of Labor Statistics for publishing accurate data.
Don’t trust anything else to be published from now as accurate. What does the future of the U.S. economy look like…? Time will tell.
Don’t trust anything else to be published from now as accurate. What does the future of the U.S. economy look like…? Time will tell.
The data is misleading as many companies and consumers bought in surplus ahead of the tariffs. Tariffs will suck money out of consumers shortly so expect forward headwinds.
July 30, 2025 at 12:45 PM
The data is misleading as many companies and consumers bought in surplus ahead of the tariffs. Tariffs will suck money out of consumers shortly so expect forward headwinds.
I think that it’s more he didn’t have compelling evidence. Keep in mind, the standard for “proof” was far less in 2016.
July 25, 2025 at 1:12 PM
I think that it’s more he didn’t have compelling evidence. Keep in mind, the standard for “proof” was far less in 2016.
No, not at all. The philosophy is to ‘poison the well’ and then wait for the people to drink the tainted water.
July 25, 2025 at 12:16 PM
No, not at all. The philosophy is to ‘poison the well’ and then wait for the people to drink the tainted water.
I mean, regardless of individual political stance/views, these people are supposed to be representing us. They’ve been elected to their post on that basis. How can they reconcile voting against the majority of citizen’s wishes and interests? Sick and sad!!!
June 28, 2025 at 12:36 PM
I mean, regardless of individual political stance/views, these people are supposed to be representing us. They’ve been elected to their post on that basis. How can they reconcile voting against the majority of citizen’s wishes and interests? Sick and sad!!!
Reposted by Bumblebee
Reposted by Bumblebee
