Adam Gill
@adam-gill.bsky.social
56 followers 81 following 7 posts
PhD Candidate in Economics at Uppsala University https://sites.google.com/view/adam-gill/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Adam Gill
markrubin.bsky.social
New survey of 802 experimental/behavioral economists finds:

(a) most support preserving anonymity for referees

(b) most are open to publishing anonymized referee reports

Preprint: osf.io/preprints/me...

By @danieljevans.bsky.social, @adam-gill.bsky.social, et al.
Open science initiatives have gained traction in recent years. However, open peer-review practices, i.e., reforms that (i) modify the identifiability of stakeholders and (ii) establish channels for the open communication of information between stakeholders, have seen very little adoption in economics. In this paper, we explore the feasibility and desirability of such reforms. We present insights derived from survey data documenting the attitudes of 802 experimental/behavioral economists, a conceptual framework, a literature review, and cross-disciplinary data on current journal practices. On (i), most respondents support preserving anonymity for referees, but views about anonymity for authors and associate editors are mixed. On (ii), most respondents are open to publishing anonymized referee reports, sharing reports between referees, and allowing authors to appeal editorial decisions. Active reviewers, editors, and respondents from the US/Canada are generally less open to transparency reforms.
Reposted by Adam Gill
nber.org
NBER @nber.org · Mar 23
Scandinavian employees work more from home. Likely causes are high trust and advanced technology. Increases in remote work affect the spatial distribution of local service jobs, from Adam Gill, Lena E. Hensvik, and Oskar Nordström Skans https://www.nber.org/papers/w33581
adam-gill.bsky.social
6/ Overall, we find that trust is a key driver of regional differences in WFH and it is important for sustaining WFH at firm and aggregate levels.

We also find interesting heterogeneity by WFH type and occupation potential.

See the paper for more detail: docs.iza.org/dp17468.pdf
docs.iza.org
adam-gill.bsky.social
5/ In 2019, high-trust areas had significantly more WFH than low-trust ones, even with individual and region controls. By 2021, trust effects grew stronger.

No evidence of low-trust areas “catching up”—trust reinforced WFH, especially in mid-remote roles and for managers.
adam-gill.bsky.social
4/ We use trust data from the European Social Survey aggregated at country, region, and region-by-industry levels, and WFH data from the European Labor Force Surveys.

Our key trust measure—managers believe “people are fair”— predicts WFH better than institutional trust metrics.
adam-gill.bsky.social
3/ In a stylized model, we show how managerial trust shapes WFH when firms weigh wage savings vs. productivity loss from shirking.

Prediction: Firms should only offer WFH in settings where there is high aggregate trust, since unilateral deviation will only attract shirkers.
adam-gill.bsky.social
2/ WFH is rising but it is challenging for managers due to loss of oversight, making trust essential for WFH.

The data shows that higher managerial trust (belief that “most people are fair”) links to higher WFH rates pre-pandemic (2019) and greater WFH growth (2019–2021).
adam-gill.bsky.social
1/ TL;DR:

Managerial trust strongly correlates with WFH. Places where managers believe people are trustworthy had higher WFH rates pre- and mid-pandemic—even when controlling for occupations, demographics, digital skills, & GDP.

More below 👇
adam-gill.bsky.social
🚨New Working Paper!🚨

Excited to share a new IZA DP (No. 17468) with @oskarnskans.bsky.social looking at the relationship between trust and work from home (WFH). #EconSky

“Trusted from Home: Managerial Beliefs and Workers’ Spatial Autonomy”

docs.iza.org/dp17468.pdf

A short 🧵…