@AdamEisgrau
@adameisgrau.bsky.social
#FairUse fighter for @ChamberofProgress’ Generate & Create campaign. JD, Hill staffer, long-time tech wonk. Amateur photographer, jazz lover, art junkie, avid house plant killer.
That’s a great suggestion, “JF”. I’ll check it out. Have great Turkey Day!
November 27, 2025 at 5:06 PM
That’s a great suggestion, “JF”. I’ll check it out. Have great Turkey Day!
Plaintiffs' Complaint is online at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7197...
The new case is docketed as Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation, 3:25-cv-10287, (N.D. Cal.) www.courtlistener.com/docket/7197...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7197...
The new case is docketed as Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation, 3:25-cv-10287, (N.D. Cal.) www.courtlistener.com/docket/7197...
Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation, 3:25-cv-10287 - CourtListener.com
Docket for Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation, 3:25-cv-10287 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
www.courtlistener.com
November 27, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Plaintiffs' Complaint is online at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7197...
The new case is docketed as Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation, 3:25-cv-10287, (N.D. Cal.) www.courtlistener.com/docket/7197...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7197...
The new case is docketed as Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation, 3:25-cv-10287, (N.D. Cal.) www.courtlistener.com/docket/7197...
Plaintiffs, who are alleging willful violation of the DMCA, are seeking maximum relief of every kind for themselves and possibly millions more creators, including temporary and permanent injunctions on the ongoing use of plaintiffs' content used to train Cosmos:
November 27, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Plaintiffs, who are alleging willful violation of the DMCA, are seeking maximum relief of every kind for themselves and possibly millions more creators, including temporary and permanent injunctions on the ongoing use of plaintiffs' content used to train Cosmos:
Noting @ZiffDavis.com's seemingly similar DMCA claim v @OpenAI.com in the SDNY, @Nvidia.com may argue that the anti-*copying* tech employed by YT to block downloads for non-premium subscribers isn't the kind of *access* control the DMCA covers. Plaintiffs argue here (a bit wanly to my ears):
November 27, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Noting @ZiffDavis.com's seemingly similar DMCA claim v @OpenAI.com in the SDNY, @Nvidia.com may argue that the anti-*copying* tech employed by YT to block downloads for non-premium subscribers isn't the kind of *access* control the DMCA covers. Plaintiffs argue here (a bit wanly to my ears):
The proposed plaintiff class is potentially enormous:
November 27, 2025 at 2:25 PM
The proposed plaintiff class is potentially enormous:
Plaintiffs are a creator of unspecified content with "over 4 billion" views and 2.6 million subscribers, and YouTube's "Mr.ShortGame" and "Golfaholic"– two golf programmers who combined, the Complaint recites, have garnered hundreds of millions of views and 630,000+ subscribers:
November 27, 2025 at 2:24 PM
Plaintiffs are a creator of unspecified content with "over 4 billion" views and 2.6 million subscribers, and YouTube's "Mr.ShortGame" and "Golfaholic"– two golf programmers who combined, the Complaint recites, have garnered hundreds of millions of views and 630,000+ subscribers:
Although the Complaint happily doesn't actually allege "assault," its rhetoric does get a bit aggressive:
November 27, 2025 at 2:24 PM
Although the Complaint happily doesn't actually allege "assault," its rhetoric does get a bit aggressive:
.@Entrepreneur's case will carry the Kadrey caption in future. It was originally docketed as Entrepreneur Media, LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 3:25-cv-09579, (N.D. Cal.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7188...
Judge Chhabria's Order is online at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6756...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7188...
Judge Chhabria's Order is online at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6756...
Order Relating Case – #655 in Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc. (N.D. Cal., 3:23-cv-03417) – CourtListener.com
ORDER RELATING CASES: 23-cv-03417-VC & 25-cv-09579-BLF. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 11/25/2025. (bxs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2025) (Entered: 11/25/2025)
www.courtlistener.com
November 26, 2025 at 7:15 PM
.@Entrepreneur's case will carry the Kadrey caption in future. It was originally docketed as Entrepreneur Media, LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 3:25-cv-09579, (N.D. Cal.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7188...
Judge Chhabria's Order is online at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6756...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7188...
Judge Chhabria's Order is online at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6756...
The case is Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 5:25-cv-06213, (N.D. Cal.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7089...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7089...
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 5:25-cv-06213 - CourtListener.com
Docket for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 5:25-cv-06213 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
www.courtlistener.com
November 21, 2025 at 10:07 PM
The case is Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 5:25-cv-06213, (N.D. Cal.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7089...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/7089...
It may not be too much of a stretch to suggest that this may prove to be the shortest-lived suit of its kind yet filed.
@Meta.com's Reply is online via ECF at:
ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sho...
@Meta.com's Reply is online via ECF at:
ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sho...
November 21, 2025 at 10:07 PM
It may not be too much of a stretch to suggest that this may prove to be the shortest-lived suit of its kind yet filed.
@Meta.com's Reply is online via ECF at:
ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sho...
@Meta.com's Reply is online via ECF at:
ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sho...
It's points throughout the filing are as a solid and factually clear as they are on direct infringement:
November 21, 2025 at 10:07 PM
It's points throughout the filing are as a solid and factually clear as they are on direct infringement:
@OpenAI.com's Memo of Law in support of its Opposition to the Motion to Amend is online via ECF at:
ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/doc1/127038...
The case is In Re: OpenAI, Inc. Copyright Infringement Litigation, 1:25-md-03143, (S.D.N.Y.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/doc1/127038...
The case is In Re: OpenAI, Inc. Copyright Infringement Litigation, 1:25-md-03143, (S.D.N.Y.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
In Re: OpenAI, Inc. Copyright Infringement Litigation, 1:25-md-03143 - CourtListener.com
Docket for In Re: OpenAI, Inc. Copyright Infringement Litigation, 1:25-md-03143 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
www.courtlistener.com
November 21, 2025 at 9:18 PM
@OpenAI.com's Memo of Law in support of its Opposition to the Motion to Amend is online via ECF at:
ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/doc1/127038...
The case is In Re: OpenAI, Inc. Copyright Infringement Litigation, 1:25-md-03143, (S.D.N.Y.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/doc1/127038...
The case is In Re: OpenAI, Inc. Copyright Infringement Litigation, 1:25-md-03143, (S.D.N.Y.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6987...
@OpenAI.com also argues that, even if robot.txt notices are cognizable, it didn't "circumvent" the protocols within the meaning of the statute:
November 21, 2025 at 9:18 PM
@OpenAI.com also argues that, even if robot.txt notices are cognizable, it didn't "circumvent" the protocols within the meaning of the statute:
@OpenAI.com's argument seemingly solid is entirely non-technical and direct: a notice isn't a "locked gate":
November 21, 2025 at 9:18 PM
@OpenAI.com's argument seemingly solid is entirely non-technical and direct: a notice isn't a "locked gate":
Obviously, the result's important to @ZiffDavis.com, but it's also potentially consequential in many other cases. Spooked by the partial "training = fair use" ruling in Bartz, other plaintiffs have jumped to amend their cases to add DMCA claims "immune" by law to a fair use defense.
November 21, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Obviously, the result's important to @ZiffDavis.com, but it's also potentially consequential in many other cases. Spooked by the partial "training = fair use" ruling in Bartz, other plaintiffs have jumped to amend their cases to add DMCA claims "immune" by law to a fair use defense.
@Google.com's Opposition to the Motion for Certification is available by ECG here:
ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sho...
It's pointed Motion to Sanction is at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6759...
ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sho...
It's pointed Motion to Sanction is at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6759...
Sanctions – #298 in In re Google Generative AI Copyright Litigation (N.D. Cal., 5:23-cv-03440) – CourtListener.com
Sanctions
www.courtlistener.com
November 21, 2025 at 8:45 PM
@Google.com's Opposition to the Motion for Certification is available by ECG here:
ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sho...
It's pointed Motion to Sanction is at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6759...
ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/sho...
It's pointed Motion to Sanction is at:
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6759...
The case is In re Google Generative AI Copyright Litigation, 5:23-cv-03440, (N.D. Cal.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6759...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6759...
In re Google Generative AI Copyright Litigation, 5:23-cv-03440 - CourtListener.com
Docket for In re Google Generative AI Copyright Litigation, 5:23-cv-03440 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
www.courtlistener.com
November 21, 2025 at 8:45 PM
The case is In re Google Generative AI Copyright Litigation, 5:23-cv-03440, (N.D. Cal.)
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6759...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/6759...
.@Google wants ALL of plaintiffs' class allegations struck down. . . WITH prejudice:
November 21, 2025 at 8:45 PM
.@Google wants ALL of plaintiffs' class allegations struck down. . . WITH prejudice: