Ja Adofo Tunza or something like that
@adofoja.bsky.social
Political burner account to keep my sanity/Progressive/Mensa/anti-MAGAt/Fan of freedom, Black radicals, NFL, NBA, and LADIES/🇯🇴
That comes with the territory. RESIGN if you can't stand the heat.
November 29, 2025 at 11:52 PM
That comes with the territory. RESIGN if you can't stand the heat.
Reagan laid the groundwork for a lot of this to happen.
November 29, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Reagan laid the groundwork for a lot of this to happen.
You really think we have free and fair elections?
November 29, 2025 at 7:27 PM
You really think we have free and fair elections?
Only every OTHER day?
November 29, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Only every OTHER day?
Compare the maximum downside risks AT THAT MOMENT of each option. While it was impossible to achieve maximum upside (i.e. win the game) choosing either option, there was only ONE option that could produce a guaranteed loss. Thus, there were asymmetric risks/rewards.
It was a terrible decision.
It was a terrible decision.
November 29, 2025 at 3:37 PM
Compare the maximum downside risks AT THAT MOMENT of each option. While it was impossible to achieve maximum upside (i.e. win the game) choosing either option, there was only ONE option that could produce a guaranteed loss. Thus, there were asymmetric risks/rewards.
It was a terrible decision.
It was a terrible decision.
EXACTLY
Compare the maximum downside risks AT THAT MOMENT of each option. While it was impossible to achieve maximum upside (i.e. win the game) choosing either option, there was only ONE option that could produce a guaranteed loss. Thus, there were asymmetric risk/reward ratios.
Compare the maximum downside risks AT THAT MOMENT of each option. While it was impossible to achieve maximum upside (i.e. win the game) choosing either option, there was only ONE option that could produce a guaranteed loss. Thus, there were asymmetric risk/reward ratios.
November 29, 2025 at 3:36 PM
EXACTLY
Compare the maximum downside risks AT THAT MOMENT of each option. While it was impossible to achieve maximum upside (i.e. win the game) choosing either option, there was only ONE option that could produce a guaranteed loss. Thus, there were asymmetric risk/reward ratios.
Compare the maximum downside risks AT THAT MOMENT of each option. While it was impossible to achieve maximum upside (i.e. win the game) choosing either option, there was only ONE option that could produce a guaranteed loss. Thus, there were asymmetric risk/reward ratios.
Honestly, voluntary segregation (e.g. HBCUs) can be a beautiful thing.
November 27, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Honestly, voluntary segregation (e.g. HBCUs) can be a beautiful thing.
How can they seek the death penalty if no one died?
November 27, 2025 at 5:28 PM
How can they seek the death penalty if no one died?