Adoptee Rights Law Center
@adopteerights.bsky.social
820 followers 83 following 93 posts
Lawyer, law firm, adopted person. Lover of toast. Based in Minnesota, born and adopted in the District of Columbia | adopteerightslaw.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Adoptee Rights Law Center
kaileepedersen.bsky.social
🥚 for the adoptee feed - this is my second novel, and my first with an adoptee protagonist! 🥰 🙂
adopteerights.bsky.social
The US Senate has introduced the bipartisan Protect Adoptees and American Families Act, formerly known as the Adoptee Citizenship Act. Let's get this enacted so that thousands of intercountry adoptees finally secure US citizenship. 🥚 adopteesunited.org/congress-int...
The Protect Adoptees and American Families Act | Adoptees United
The fight for US citizenship for all intercountry adoptees continues, with introduction of the Protect Adoptees and American Families Act
adopteesunited.org
adopteerights.bsky.social
I'm serious. I should give a prize to the person who figures it out. (also, person does not have a US passport and never has).
adopteerights.bsky.social
Intercountry adoptee never possessed her original certificate of naturalization and has lost her state ID. Your job? Figure out how to get just *one* of them now. One. Good luck.
Thick black rubber band twisted to resemble a Mobius strip, set on a dark grey background, creating a sense of endless motion.
adopteerights.bsky.social
I’m not aware of deleting any comments on YouTube. I rarely even check the comments I receive on YouTube. I just don’t have the capacity to do so.
adopteerights.bsky.social
It goes beyond reviewing what are currently disqualifying actions or crimes and adds new ones---albeit undefined and expansive, to wit:
• Any other acts that are contrary to the average behavior of citizens in the jurisdiction where aliens reside. These could be actions that, while technically lawful, may be inconsistent with civic responsibility within the community, such as reckless or habitual traffic infractions, or harassment or aggressive solicitation.
• In assessing acts that are unlawful or contrary to the average behavior of citizens of the community in which the alien resides USCIS will review all available documentation and question aliens seeking naturalization regarding the specific circumstances of their actions to determine if a particular situation or act should bar an alien from naturalization.
adopteerights.bsky.social
In general, the new policy aims to create a new and incredibly abstract burden to naturalize, namely to show you are "worthy" of being a US citizen, apparently tied to your local community.
“Totality of Circumstances Approach: Going forward, USCIS officers must account for an alien’s positive attributes and not simply the absence of misconduct. In evaluating whether or not an alien has met the requirement of establishing GMC the Officer must take a holistic approach in evaluating whether or not an alien seeking naturalization has affirmatively established that he or she has met their burden of establishing that they are worthy of assuming the rights and responsibilities of United States Citizenship.”
adopteerights.bsky.social
The shift in evaluating GMC for a person seeking naturalization will involve a "holistic assessment of an alien's behavior, adherence to societal norms, and positive contributions that affirmatively demonstrate good moral character."
adopteerights.bsky.social
USCIS has updated its policy guidance on what constitutes "Good Moral Character" (GMC), what a foreign national must demonstrate to become a US citizen. The new "holistic" approach is incredibly broad. It will no doubt be challenged. It's here: uscis.gov/sites/defaul...
“The regulations and policy affirm that GMC findings must go beyond the absence of disqualifying acts, it must reflect a genuine positive assessment of who the alien is and how they have lived in their community. Thus, GMC has generally meant a character commensurate with the standards of average citizens of the community in which the alien resides.”

From, Restoring a Rigorous, Holistic, and Comprehensive Good
Moral Character Evaluation Standard for Aliens Applying
for Naturalization | USCIS Policy Memorandum, 8/15/2025
Reposted by Adoptee Rights Law Center
granthermes.bsky.social
Adoptees are getting caught in immigration troubles they never thought they’d be in. Many didn’t even know they could be targets.

The full conversation with Greg Luce from @adopteerights.bsky.social is out now! Wherever you get your podcasts. Just search Make It Make Sense with Grant Hermes
adopteerights.bsky.social
I've been tracking redactions and withholding of critical documents from my client's "A Files," which are released as part of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. It's pretty bad. 🥚 public.flourish.studio/visualisatio...
USCIS: All Redacted and Withheld Pages
A Flourish data visualization by Gregory D Luce
public.flourish.studio
adopteerights.bsky.social
Do your fellow adoptee authors and researchers (and readers!) a favor. Request your local library to add the author's books to the library's collection. It makes a difference. 🥚 cc: @thesusanito.bsky.social
Screenshot of a library request to add the book I Would Meet You Anywhere to the library's collection. The request was for the book by Author Susan Kiyo Ito and the response in a blue box at the bottom indicates that "This title will be ordered. You may request it when it appears in the library catalog within 7 to 10 days. If you need assistance, please Ask US. In green in the upper right corner is the word Approved. Screenshot of the library listing for the book by I Would Meet Your Anywhere by Susan Kiyo Ito. The screenshot indicates that all 3 copies available are in use and that you can can request a hold on the book when it becomes available.
adopteerights.bsky.social
I get so angry with courts when they won’t provide, upon request, an adoptee’s own adoption decree. The court just told one client to bring his mother to get it. He’s 40 years old.
adopteerights.bsky.social
I just received another FOIA response from USCIS and they removed the names of every person mentioned in 69 pages of records. EVERY PERSON, except one: my client, whose own name was not redacted. Her adoptive parents' names were removed from all records, including the decree. Absurd.
Screenshot of text describing the standard to remove information from a FOIA request to USCIS. In yellow highlighted marker are the words "We have completed the review of all documents and have identified 69 pages that are responsive to your request. Enclosed are 4 pages release in their entirety and 24 pages released in part. We are withholding 41 pages in full.
adopteerights.bsky.social
For the first time EVER, USCIS has redacted the names of ADOPTIVE PARENTS in my client's immigration file (not to mention birthparent names, sibling names, and even the names of judges and officials involved in the adoption). Unbelievable. We're going to appeal. 🥚
Screenshot of an official record involving an adoption. The title of the snippet is "PARENTS" and it lists below a Father and Mother, though the names of the Father and Mother have been redacted by the use of white opaque boxes. The adoption is from Ukraine and the adoptive parents are US citizens.