Advances.in
@advances.in
99 followers 17 following 49 posts
The academic publisher that pays editors and reviewers for their work. advances.in
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
advances.in
🚨Publication Alert: Can emotional acculturation, usually seen as beneficial, have hidden costs?

Immigrant minority students who internalize majority emotional norms report more social contact but less school engagement—especially when facing discrimination.

advances.in/psychology/1...
The paradoxical effect of emotional acculturation in discriminatory contexts: School adjustment of immigrant minority youth
Emotional acculturation impacts school engagement and social contact in immigrant youth, with discrimination influencing these effects over time.
advances.in
advances.in
🚨 Just published in advances.in/psychology: “Cross-lagged panel networks” combine network theory and SEM to track dynamic, item-level effects across constructs like self-esteem and school commitment. advances.in/psychology/1...
Cross-lagged panel networks
Cross-lagged panel network analysis uncovers longitudinal item-level links between self-esteem and school commitment using regularized regression SEM.
advances.in
advances.in
📢 New in advances .in/psychology: How do mobile phones, social media & digital diasporas shape modern migration experiences? Explore emerging research on digitally mediated acculturation by Jaimee Stuart, Colleen Ward, @jkarl.bsky.social, and Ronald Musizvingoza.
advances.in/psychology/1...
Intercultural contact in the digital age: A review of emerging research on digitally mediated acculturation
Explores how digital tech shapes migrants' acculturation via mobile phones, social media, and digital diaspora interactions.
advances.in
advances.in
Recognizing the financial pressures many academics experience in these trying times, we have waived the Article Processing Charge for this special issue. Kindly repost.
advances.in
Yes, we offer that option!
Reposted by Advances.in
svenep.bsky.social
Why do some reject science on vaccines or climate change? It's often about what they consider trustworthy. Tailored approaches—teaching what makes info credible (like peer review) & framing facts to align with values—can bridge the gap. Let’s educate, not alienate.
Reposted by Advances.in
achetverikov.bsky.social
Just read about this journal started by a colleague from Oslo (@kunstjonas.bsky.social). They pay reviewers - seems like an interesting model, definitely better than the traditional one. 100$ for a peer-review (one or more rounds) is not much, but can add a bit of motivation.
Reposted by Advances.in
valentinmang.bsky.social
If you're interested in research on misinformation and conspiracy beliefs, I can highly recommend checking out this special issue!
Reposted by Advances.in
philippschmid.bsky.social
It was great contributing to this together with the amazing Carolin Ziemer & friends: Ziemer et al. (2024) conducted a preregistered experimental study examining the susceptibility to pro-Russian disinformation about the war in Ukraine among Germans with and without a Russian migration background.
advances.in
Thanks to all our fantastic authors, including those we could locate on Bluesky (and we suggest you follow!): @cecilietraberg.bsky.social @profsanderlinden.bsky.social @corneliabetsch.bsky.social @tobiasrothmund.bsky.social @clarapretus.bsky.social
advances.in
Why do debates in misinformation research persist? Methodology matters! A new study in advances.in/psychology reanalyzes 143,956 data points, shedding light on how conscientiousness and ideology shape fake news sharing. advances.in/psychology/1...
Resolving conflicting findings in misinformation research: A methodological perspective
Explore how methodological choices shape conflicting findings in misinformation and fake news research.
advances.in
advances.in
🚨New in advances .in/psychology: Robson et al. explore reasoning behind misinformation beliefs. Quantitative analysis reveals key differences in how believers & non-believers evaluate evidence. Important insights for combating false claims. advances.in/psychology/1...
Lazy or different? A quantitative content analysis of how believers and nonbelievers of misinformation reason - advances.in/psychology
Quantitative analysis reveals key differences in reasoning between believers and nonbelievers of misinformation and conspiracy theories.
advances.in
advances.in
🔊New in advances.in/psychology: "Source credibility effects in misinformation research: A review and primer" by
Mang, Fennis, & Epstude

This systematic review unravels the complex role of source credibility in misinformation contexts.
advances.in/psychology/1...
Source credibility effects in misinformation research: A review and primer
Explore the role of source credibility in misinformation research. This review uncovers factors causing inconsistent findings and suggests future directions.
advances.in